Background: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument has been developed to inform the methodology, reporting and appraisal of clinical practice guidelines. Evidence suggests that the quality of surgical guidelines can be improved, and the structure and content of AGREE II can be modified to help enhance the quality of guidelines of surgical interventions. Objective: To develop an extension of AGREE II specifically designed for guidelines of surgical interventions. Methods:In the tripartite Guideline Assessment Project (GAP) funded by United European Gastroenterology and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, (i) we assessed the quality of surgical guidelines and we identified factors associated with higher quality (GAP I); (ii) we applied correlation analysis, factor analysis andThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

.

No abstract

Nos interesa debatir en este artículo las conclusiones a las que Carlos Lenkersdorf llega respecto a la sociedad y cultura tojolabal y el método. Lenkersdorf señala en el texto en discusión que su interés es acceder, a partir del estudio de la lengua, a la cosmovisión de este grupo, es decir, a cómo "lo real" es visto por los tojolabales. Aunque en el texto no es difícil percibir su mirada ajena a esta cultura, propone que para comprender la cosmovisión tojolabal, hay que convertirse irremediablemente en uno de ellos.

No abstract