Background: STN-DBS is a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). The traditional approach is to use an awake operative technique with microelectrode recording (MER). However, more centers start using an asleep MRI-guided technique without MER. Objective: We systematically reviewed the literature to compare STN-DBS surgery with and without MER for differences in clinical outcome. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for randomized clinical trials and consecutive cohort studies published between 01-01-2000 and 26-08-2021, that included at least 10 PD patients who had received bilateral STN-DBS. Results: 2,129 articles were identified. After abstract screening and full-text review, 26 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total of 34 study groups (29 MER and 5 non-MER). The standardized mean difference (SMD) in change in motor symptoms between baseline (OFF medication) and 6–24 months follow-up (OFF medication and ON stimulation) was 1.64 for the MER group and 1.87 for non-MER group (p = 0.59). SMD in change in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was 1.14 for the MER group and 0.65 for non-MER group (p <  0.01). Insufficient data were available for comparative analysis of PDQ-39 and complications. Conclusion: The change in motor symptoms from baseline to follow-up did not differ between studies that used MER and those that did not. The postoperative reduction in LEDD from baseline to follow-up was greater in the MER-group. In the absence of high-quality studies comparing both methods, there is a clear need for a well-designed comparative trial.

Background: Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) has become a cornerstone in the advanced treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Despite its well-established clinical benefit, there is a significant variation in the way surgery is performed. Most centers operate with the patient awake to allow for microelectrode recording (MER) and intraoperative clinical testing. However, technical advances in MR imaging and MRI-guided surgery raise the question whether MER and intraoperative clinical testing still have added value in DBS-surgery. Objective: To evaluate the added value of MER and intraoperative clinical testing to determine final lead position in awake MRI-guided and stereotactic CT-verified STN-DBS surgery for PD. Methods: 29 consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients underwent awake bilateral STN-DBS with MER and intraoperative clinical testing. The role of MER and clinical testing in determining final lead position was evaluated. Furthermore, interobserver variability in determining the MRI-defined STN along the planned trajectory was investigated. Clinical improvement was evaluated at 12 months follow-up and adverse events were recorded. Results: 98% of final leads were placed in the central MER-track with an accuracy of 0.88±0.45 mm. Interobserver variability of the MRI-defined STN was 0.84±0.09. Compared to baseline, mean improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III, PDQ-39 and LEDD were 26.7±16.0 points (54%) (p <  0.001), 9.0±20.0 points (19%) (p = 0.025), and 794±434 mg/day (59%) (p <  0.001) respectively. There were 19 adverse events in 11 patients, one of which (lead malposition requiring immediate postoperative revision) was a serious adverse event. Conclusion: MER and intraoperative clinical testing had no additional value in determining final lead position. These results changed our daily clinical practice to an asleep MRI-guided and stereotactic CT-verified approach.

Purpose Posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation in preterm infants is primarily treated using temporising measures, of which the placement of a ventricular access device (VAD) is one option. Permanent shunt dependency rates are high, though vary widely. In order to improve the treatment burden and lower shunt dependency rates, we implemented several changes over the years. One of these changes involves the setting of the surgery from general anaesthesia in the OR to local anaesthesia in bed at the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), which may seem counterintuitive to many. In this article, we describe our surgical technique and present the results of this regimen and compare it to our previous techniques. Methods Retrospective study of a consecutive series of 37 neonates with posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (PHVD) treated using a VAD, with a cohort I (n = 13) treated from 2004 to 2008 under general anaesthesia in the OR, cohort II (n = 11) treated from 2009 to 2013 under general anaesthesia in the NICU and cohort III (n = 13) treated from December 2013 to December 2017 under local anaesthesia on the NICU. Results The overall infection rate was 14%; the VAD revision rate was 22% and did not differ significantly between the cohorts. Procedures under local anaesthesia never required conversion to general anaesthesia and were well tolerated. After an average of 33 tapping days, 38% of the neonates received a permanent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. The permanent VP shunt rate was 9% with VAD placement under local anaesthesia and 52% when performed under general anaesthesia (p = 0.02). Conclusion Bedside placement of VADs for PHVD under local anaesthesia in neonates is a low-risk, well-tolerated procedure that results in at least equal results to surgery performed under general anaesthesia and/or performed in an OR.