Free energies of hydration are of fundamental interest for modeling and understanding conformational and phase equilibria of macromolecular solutes in aqueous phases. Of particular relevance to systems such as intrinsically disordered proteins are the free energies of hydration and hydration structures of model compounds that mimic charged side chains of Arg, Lys, Asp, and Glu. Here, we deploy a Thermodynamic Cycle-based Proton Dissociation (TCPD) approach in conjunction with data from direct measurements to obtain estimates for the free energies of hydration for model compounds that mimic the side chains of Arg + , Lys + , Asp – , and Glu – . Irrespective of the choice made for the hydration free energy of the proton, the TCPD approach reveals clear trends regarding the free energies of hydration for Arg + , Lys + , Asp – , and Glu – . These trends include asymmetries between the hydration free energies of acidic (Asp – and Glu – ) and basic (Arg + and Lys + ) residues. Further, the TCPD analysis, which relies on a combination of experimental data, shows that the free energy of hydration of Arg + is less favorable than that of Lys + . We sought a physical explanation for the TCPD-derived trends in free energies of hydration. To this end, we performed temperature-dependent calculations of free energies of hydration and analyzed hydration structures from simulations that use the polarizable Atomic Multipole Optimized Energetics for Biomolecular Applications (AMOEBA) force field and water model. At 298 K, the AMOEBA model generates estimates of free energies of hydration that are consistent with TCPD values with a free energy of hydration for the proton of ca. −259 kcal/mol. Analysis of temperature-dependent simulations leads to a structural explanation for the observed differences in free energies of hydration of ionizable residues and reveals that the heat capacity of hydration is positive for Arg + and Lys + and negative for Asp – and Glu – .
Ionizable residues can release and take up protons and this has an influence on protein structure and function. The extent of protonation is linked to the overall pH of the solution and the local environments of ionizable residues. Binding or unbinding of a single proton generates a distinct charge microstate defined by a specific pattern of charges. Accordingly, the overall partition function is a sum over all charge microstates and Boltzmann weights of all conformations associated with each of the charge microstates. This ensemble-of-ensembles description recast as a q-canonical ensemble allows us to analyze and interpret potentiometric titrations that provide information regarding net charge as a function of pH. In the q-canonical ensemble, charge microstates are grouped into mesostates where each mesostate is a collection of microstates of the same net charge. Here, we show that leveraging the structure of the q-canonical ensemble allows us to decouple contributions of net proton binding and release from proton arrangement and conformational considerations. Through application of the q-canonical formalism to analyze potentiometric measurements of net charge in proteins with repetitive patterns of Lys and Glu residues, we determine the underlying mesostate pK a values and, more importantly, we estimate relative mesostate populations as a function of pH. This is a strength of using the q-canonical approach that cannot be replicated using purely site-specific analyses. Overall, our work shows how measurements of charge equilibria, decoupled from measurements of conformational equilibria, and analyzed using the framework of the q-canonical ensemble, provide protein-specific quantitative descriptions of pH-dependent populations of mesostates. This method is of direct relevance for measuring and understanding how different charge states contribute to conformational, binding, and phase equilibria of proteins.
Many naturally occurring elastomers are intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) built up of repeating units, and they can demonstrate two types of thermoresponsive phase behavior. Systems characterized by lower critical solution temperatures (LCSTs) undergo phase separation above the LCST, whereas systems characterized by upper critical solution temperatures (UCSTs) undergo phase separation below the UCST. There is congruence between thermoresponsive coil–globule transitions and phase behavior, whereby the theta temperatures above or below which the IDPs transition from coils to globules serve as useful proxies for the LCST/UCST values. This implies that one can design sequences with desired values for the theta temperature with either increasing or decreasing radii of gyration above the theta temperature. Here, we show that the Monte Carlo simulations performed in the so-called intrinsic solvation (IS) limit version of the temperature dependent self-Assembly of Biomolecules Studied by an Implicit, Novel, and Tunable Hamiltonian (ABSINTH) implicit solvation model yield a useful heuristic for discriminating between sequences with known LCST and UCST phase behavior. Accordingly, we use this heuristic in a supervised approach, integrate it with a genetic algorithm, combine this with IS limit simulations, and demonstrate that novel sequences can be designed with LCST phase behavior. These calculations are aided by direct estimates of temperature dependent free energies of solvation for model compounds that are derived using the polarizable atomic multipole optimized energetics for biomolecular applications forcefield. To demonstrate the validity of our designs, we calculate coil–globule transition profiles using the full ABSINTH model and combine these with Gaussian cluster theory calculations to establish the LCST phase behavior of designed IDPs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.