Continuous intra-arterial nimodipine infusion is an effective treatment for patients with severe cerebral vasospasm who fail to respond to HHT and oral nimodipine alone. Key to the effective administration of continuous intra-arterial nimodipine is multimodal neuromonitoring and the individual adaptation of dosage and time of infusion for each patient.
Long-term CIAN therapy is associated with diverse side effects. The leading problems are an impairment of the hemodynamic situation and cardiac problems, an increase in infectious complications, a worsening of the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, and rising ICP values. Teams on neurointensive care units must be aware of these side effects to avoid that the beneficial effects of CIAN therapy on CV reported elsewhere are foiled by the problems this technique can be associated with.
Purpose In Europe, intravenous fosfomycin (IV) is used particularly in difficult-to-treat or complex infections, caused by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens including multidrug-resistant strains. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin under real-life conditions. Methods Prospective, multi-center, and non-interventional study in patients with bacterial infections from 20 intensive care units (ICU) in Germany and Austria (NCT01173575). Results Overall, 209 patients were included (77 females, 132 males, mean age: 59 ± 16 years), 194 of which were treated in intensive care (APACHE II score at the beginning of fosfomycin therapy: 23 ± 8). Main indications (± bacteremia or sepsis) were infections of the CNS (21.5%), community-(CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP, 15.3%), bone and joint infections (BJI, 11%), abdominal infections (11%), and bacteremia (10.5%). Most frequently identified pathogens were S. aureus (22.3%), S. epidermidis (14.2%), Enterococcus spp. (10.8%), E. coli (12.3%) and Klebsiella spp. (7.7%). At least one multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen was isolated from 51 patients (24.4%). Fosfomycin was administered with an average daily dose of 13.7 ± 3.5 g over 12.4 ± 8.6 days, almost exclusively (99%) in combination with other antibiotics. The overall clinical success was favorable in 81.3% (148/182) of cases, and in 84.8% (39/46) of patients with ≥ 1 MDR pathogen. Noteworthy, 16.3% (34/209) of patients developed at least one, in the majority of cases non-serious, adverse drug reaction during fosfomycin therapy. Conclusion Our data suggest that IV fosfomycin is an effective and safe combination partner for the treatment of a broad spectrum of severe bacterial infections in critically ill patients.
This study aimed to characterize the cellular pathways along which nitric oxide (NO) influences the secretion of renin from the kidney. Using the isolated perfused rat kidney model, we found that the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (1–30 μmol/l) induced a prompt, concentration-dependent fourfold increase of basal renin secretion. The membrane-permeable cGMP analogs 8-bromo-cGMP and 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cGMP (8-pCPT-cGMP; each 5–50 μmol/l) inhibited basal renin secretion and attenuated the stimulation of renin secretion by SNP. Conversely, the renin stimulatory effect of SNP was enhanced in the presence of the G kinase inhibitor Rp-8-CPT-cGMPS (10 μmol/l). The renin stimulatory effect of SNP was amplified in nominally calcium-free perfusate and was abolished in the presence of angiotensin II (1 nmol/l). Renin secretion stimulated by SNP was clearly attenuated by the A kinase inhibitor Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS (25 μmol/l). These findings indicate that the renin stimulatory effect of NO donors in renal juxtaglomerular cells cannot be explained by activation of G kinase and is also less likely to be causally related to the regulation of renin secretion by calcium. Because A kinase activity is required for the stimulation of renin secretion by SNP, it appears as if the renin stimulatory effect is causally related to the cAMP pathway controlling renin secretion.
1 This study aimed to investigate and to compare the e ects of pharmacological T-type calcium channel and of L-type calcium channel blockade on the renin system. To this end, male healthy SpragueDawley rats were treated with the T-channel blocker mibefradil or with the L-channel blocker amlodipine at doses of 5 mg kg 71 , 15 mg kg 71 and 45 mg kg 71 per day for four days and their e ects on plasma renin activity (PRA) and kidney renin mRNA levels were determined. 2 Whilst amlodipine lowered basal systolic blood pressure at 5 mg kg 71 , mibefradil had no e ect on basal blood pressure in the whole dose range examined. Amlodipine dose-dependently induced up to 7 fold elevation of PRA and renin mRNA levels. Mibefradil signi®cantly lowered PRA and renin mRNA levels at 5 mg kg 71 and moderately increased both parameters at a dose of 45 mg kg 71 , when PRA and renin mRNA levels were increased by 100% and 30%, respectively. In primary cultures of renal juxtaglomerular cells neither amlodipine nor mibefradil (0.1 ± 10 mM) changed renin secretion. 3 In rats unilateral renal artery clips (2K-1C) mibefradil and amlodipine at doses of 15 mg kg 71 day 71 were equally e ective in lowering blood pressure. In contrast mibefradil (5 mg kg 71 and 15 mg kg 71 day 71 ) signi®cantly attenuated the rise of PRA and renin mRNA levels, whilst amlodipine (15 mg kg 71 ) additionally elevated the rise of PRA and renin mRNA levels in response to renal artery clipping. 4 These ®ndings suggest that T-type calcium channel blockers can inhibit renin secretion and renin gene expression in vivo, whilst L-type calcium channel blockers act as stimulators of the renin system. Since the inhibitory e ect of T-type antagonists is apparent in vivo but not in vitro, one may infer that the e ect on the renin system is indirect rather than directly mediated at the level of renal juxtaglomerular cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.