No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundNurses in inpatient palliative care are frequently exposed to death and dying in addition to common stressors found in other nursing practice. Resilience may mitigate against stress but remains ill-defined and under-researched in the specialist palliative care setting.ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to understand resilience from the perspectives of inpatient palliative care nurses.DesignA thematic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.Data sourcesAcademic Search Ultimate, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline Complete, PsycINFO and Scopus.Review methodsThe review stages were searching for relevant literature, selecting relevant papers, data extraction, critical appraisal and thematic synthesis.ResultsEight studies revealed 10 subthemes, 3 descriptive themes and 1 analytical theme: resilience occurs when nurses incorporate stressful aspects of their personal or professional lives into a coherent narrative that enhances their ability to cope with the demands of their role.ConclusionPalliative care nursing is more stressful if patients or situations remind nurses of personal experiences. Nurses cope better with adequate support; however, coping does not necessarily imply increased resilience. Resilience occurs when nurses cognitively process their experiences, articulate their thoughts and feelings into a coherent narrative, and construct a sense of meaning or purpose. Future research could explore how nurses understand resilience and how it could be enhanced in the palliative care inpatient setting. With resilience, nurses may remain in the profession longer and improve the quality of care when they do.

No abstract

A house to house survey in Foleshill, Coventry, compared risk factors for Type 2 diabetes and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) among adult United Kingdom Europeans (n = 5508, 64% screened) and South Asians (n = 4395, 84% screened). Those with a high glucose and a randomized 10% of others had a glucose tolerance test while those with previously diagnosed diabetes (104 Europeans, 223 South Asians) were re-interviewed in more detail. By the age of 29 years, South Asians had higher 2 h glucose 5.4 +/- 1.0 vs 4.84 +/- 1.2 mmol l-1, p < 0.005) and insulin (45.6 vs 23.8 mU l-1, p < 0.001) concentrations and in males, a higher cholesterol concentration (5.1 +/- 0.9 vs 4.6 +/- 1.2 mmol l-1, p < 0.05). South Asians with known Type 2 diabetes had an earlier age at diagnosis (48 +/- 11 vs 57 +/- 14 years, p < 0.001), a lower body mass index in the past (29.0 +/- 4.8 vs 32.1 +/- 6.9 kg m-2, p < 0.001) and currently (27.1 +/- 3.7 vs 29.1 +/- 6.4 kg m-2, p < 0.001), were more likely to present with acute symptoms, were less likely to attend the hospital clinic (14% vs 31%, p < 0.001), and were less likely to be treated with diet alone (14% vs 21%) or with insulin (9% vs 16%) than Europeans. Glycaemic control was similar in the two ethnic groups. These findings suggest an earlier onset of the disease processes involved in diabetes in South Asians. Important ethnic differences in patterns of care exist that make clinical comparisons difficult.