Summary: Complex polymers are distributed in more than one direction of molecular heterogeneity. In addition to the molar mass distribution, they are frequently distributed with respect to chemical composition, functionality, and molecular heterogeneity. One approach for the analysis of the heterogeneity of complex polymers is their chromatographic separation by combining different separation mechanisms. A typical experimental protocol includes the separation of the sample according to composition to yield fractions that are chemically homogeneous. These fractions are transferred to a size‐selective separation method and analyzed with respect to molar mass. As a result of this two‐dimensional (2D) separation, information on both types of molecular heterogeneity is obtained. So far, 2D chromatography has been applied mostly to polymers that are soluble in organic solvents. There are several problems related to the use of aqueous mobile phases in polymer chromatography. These problems relate to the very polar or ionic character of the polymers and the experimental conditions, including the use of salt‐containing eluents. The present paper addresses the different parameters that influence the chromatographic experiments. For a model polymer system resulting from the grafting of methacrylic acid (MAA) onto poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), i.e., PEG‐g‐PMAA, it will be shown that different chromatographic techniques including SEC, LC‐CC, and 2D chromatography, as well as coupled LC‐CC/FT‐IR can be used to analyze the molecular complexity of the copolymers.LC‐CC/FT‐IR spectra of a PEG‐g‐PMAA sample as function of the elution volume.imageLC‐CC/FT‐IR spectra of a PEG‐g‐PMAA sample as function of the elution volume.

Summary: The chromatographic analysis of hydrophilic copolymers is complicated due to the fact that in most cases aqueous eluents must be used. In aqueous eluents different polar and ionic effects may disturb the selective interactions between the macromolecules and the stationary phase making it impossible to separate such copolymers with regard to chemical composition. Therefore, 2D chromatography combining a separation according to composition with a separation according to molar mass has been applied mostly to polymers that are soluble in organic solvents. The present contribution describes experimental approaches to analyze such hydrophilic copolymers by 2D‐chromatography. For a model polymer system resulting from the copolymerization of methacrylic acid and a poly(ethylene glycol) macromonomer, it is shown that different analytical techniques including SEC, LC‐CC, MALDI‐TOF MS and 2D chromatography can be used to analyze the different parameters of molecular heterogeneity of such copolymers.2D separation of poly(MPEG‐MM 2), 1st dimension: LC‐CC, 2nd dimension: SEC.magnified image2D separation of poly(MPEG‐MM 2), 1st dimension: LC‐CC, 2nd dimension: SEC.

A robust and reproducible method for the molar mass analysis of neutral and anionic copolymers based on methacrylic acid and different (meth)acrylates has been developed. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a novel polyester- based packing as the stationary phase and dimethylacetamide (DMAC) as the mobile phase yields highly accurate results for copolymers with a methacrylic acid content up to 50 wt.-%. To suppress the different polar and ionic interactions between the sample molecules, the stationary phase and the eluent, DMAC was modified with LiBr and acetic acid. Calibrating the SEC system with poly(methyl methacrylate) of narrow polydispersity, molar masses were obtained that are in good agreement with data obtained by SEC-MALLS (multi-angle laser light scattering) and SEC measurements of methylated samples. The reproducibility and the robustness of the novel method were proven by running similar samples in three different laboratories and for an extended period of two weeks.

A robust and reproducible method for the molar mass analysis of cationic copolymers based on dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate or trimethylammonioethyl methacrylate and different (meth)acrylates has been developed. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a novel polyester-based packing as the stationary phase and dimethylacetamide (DMAC) as the mobile phase yields highly accurate results for copolymers with an amino comonomer content up to 50 wt.-%. To suppress the different polar and ionic interactions between sample molecules, stationary phase and eluent, DMAC was modified with LiBr and tris(hydroxymethylamino)methane (TRIS). Calibrating the SEC system with poly(methyl methacrylate) of narrow polydispersity, molar masses were obtained that are in good agreement with viscosity data. Reproducibility and robustness of the novel method were proven by running samples for an extended period of two weeks.

Multipulse pulsed laser polymerization coupled with size exclusion chromatography (MP‐PLP‐SEC) has been employed to study the depropagation kinetics of the sterically demanding 1,1‐disubstituted monomer di(4‐tert‐butylcyclohexyl) itaconate (DBCHI). The effective rate coefficient of propagation, k, was determined for a solution of monomer in anisole at concentrations, c, 0.72 and 0.88 mol L−1 in the temperature range 0 ≤ T ≤ 70 °C. The resulting Arrhenius plot (i.e., ln k vs. 1/RT) displayed a subtle curvature in the higher temperature regime and was analyzed in the linear part to yield the activation parameters of the forward reaction. In the temperature region where no depropagation was observed (0 ≤ T ≤ 50 °C), the following Arrhenius parameters for kp were obtained (DBCHI, Ep = 35.5 ± 1.2 kJ mol−1, ln Ap = 14.8 ± 0.5 L mol−1 s−1). In addition, the k data was analyzed in the depropagatation regime for DBCHI, resulting in estimates for the associated entropy (−ΔS = 150 J mol−1 K−1) of polymerization. With decreasing monomer concentration and increasing temperature, it is increasingly more difficult to obtain well structured molecular weight distributions. The Mark Houwink Kuhn Sakurada (MHKS) parameters for di‐n‐butyl itaconate (DBI) and DBCHI were determined using a triple detection GPC system incorporating online viscometry and multi‐angle laser light scattering in THF at 40 °C. The MHKS for poly‐DBI and poly‐DBCHI in the molecular weight range 35–256 kDa and 36.5–250 kDa, respectively, were determined to be KDBI = 24.9 (103 mL g−1), αDBI = 0.58, KDBCHI = 12.8 (103 mL g−1), and αDBCHI = 0.63. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 1931–1943, 2007