No abstract

We report dynamics of seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 infections detected by IgG ELISA in 177 individuals diagnosed by RT-PCR. Longitudinal analysis identifies 2-8.5% of individuals who do not seroconvert even weeks after infection. They are younger than seroconverters who have increased co-morbidity and higher inflammatory markers such as C-Reactive Protein. Higher antibody responses are associated with non-white ethnicity. Antibody responses do not decline during follow up almost to 2 months. Serological assays increase understanding of disease severity. Their application in regular surveillance will clarify the duration and protective nature of humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2.

Here we describe an open and transparent consortium for the rapid development of COVID-19 rapid diagnostics tests. We report diagnostic accuracy data on the Mologic manufactured IgG COVID-19 ELISA on known positive serum samples and on a panel of known negative respiratory and viral serum samples pre-December 2019. : medRxiv preprint In January, Mologic, embarked on a product development pathway for COVID-19 diagnostics focusing on ELISA and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), with anticipated funding from Wellcome Trust and DFID. 834 clinical samples from known COVID-19 patients and hospital negative controls were tested on Mologic's IgG ELISA. The reported sensitivity on 270 clinical samples from 124 prospectively enrolled patients was 94% (95% CI: 89.60% -96.81%) on day 10 or more post laboratory diagnosis, and 96% (95% CI: 84.85% -99.46%) between 14-21 days post symptom onset. A specificity panel comprising 564 samples collected pre-December 2019 were tested to include most common respiratory pathogens, other types of coronavirus, and flaviviruses. Specificity in this panel was 97% (95% CI: 95.65% -98.50%).This is the first in a series of Mologic products for COVID-19, which will be deployed for COVID-19 diagnosis, contact tracing and sero-epidemiological studies to estimate disease burden and transmission with a focus on ensuring access, affordability, and availability to low-resource settings.

Background The second coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic wave in the UK progressed aggressively and was characterised by the emergence and circulation of variant of concern alpha (VOC 202012/01). The impact of this variant on in-hospital COVID-19-specific mortality has not been widely studied. We aimed to compare mortality, clinical characteristics, and management of COVID-19 patients across epidemic waves to better understand the progression of the epidemic at a hospital level and support resource planning. Methods We conducted an analytical, dynamic cohort study in a large hospital in South London. We included all adults (≥ 18 years) with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) who required hospital admission to COVID-19-specific wards between January 2020 and March 2021 (n = 2701). Outcome was COVID-19-specific in-hospital mortality ascertained through Medical Certificate Cause of Death. Results In the second wave, the number of COVID-19 admissions doubled, and the crude mortality rate dropped 25% (1.66 versus 2.23 per 100 person-days in second and first wave, respectively). After accounting for age, sex, dexamethasone, oxygen requirements, symptoms at admission and Charlson Comorbidity Index, mortality hazard ratio associated with COVID-19 admissions was 1.62 (95% CI 1.26, 2.08) times higher in the second wave. Conclusions Although crude mortality rates dropped during the second wave, the multivariable analysis suggests a higher underlying risk of death for COVID-19 admissions in the second wave. These findings are ecologically correlated with an increased circulation of SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/1 (alpha). Availability of improved management, particularly dexamethasone, was important in reducing risk of death.

Introduction: Monocyte distribution width (MDW), a parameter generated alongside full blood counts (FBC) in new-generation haematology analysers, has been proposed as a diagnostic test for severe infection/sepsis. It represents the standard deviation (SD) of the monocyte mean volume (MMV). Methods: This study aimed to compare monocyte volumetric parameters retrieved by the UniCel DxH 900 haematology analyser (MMV and MDW) against corresponding parameters from the same sample measured using flow cytometry (forward scatter [FSC] mean and SD) in combination with phenotypic characterization of monocyte subtypes. We analysed blood samples from healthy individuals (n = 11) and patients with conditions associated with elevated MDW: sepsis (n = 26) and COVID-19 (n = 15). Results: Between-instrument comparisons of monocyte volume parameters (MMV vs. FSC-mean) showed relatively good levels of correlation, but comparisons across volume variability parameters (MDW vs. FSC-SD) were poor. Stratification on sample type revealed this lack of correlation only within the sepsis group. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that in healthy controls intermediate monocytes are the largest and non-classical the smallest cells. In each disease state, however, each monocyte subset undergoes different changes in volume and frequency that together determine the overall configuration of the monocyte population. Increased MDW was associated with reduced classical monocyte frequency and increased intermediate monocyte size. In COVID-19, the range of monocyte sizes (smallest to largest) reduced, whereas in sepsis it increased. Conclusion: Increased MDW in COVID-19 and sepsis has no single flow cytometric phenotypic correlate. It represents-within a single value-the delicate equipoise between monocyte subset frequency and size.