(1) Background: vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) against seasonal influenza is considered the most effective way to protect HCWs, ensure patient’s safety and to maintain essential health care services during influenza epidemics. With the present study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of incremental bundles of measures implemented during the last three flu campaigns and to assess the attitudes towards influenza vaccination and a potential vaccine against COVID-19 among HCWs, in a large university hospital in Pisa, Italy. (2) Methods: We described measures implemented during 2018/2019, 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 and assessed their impact on flu vaccine coverage (VC) among employees and residents in Pisa university hospital. We considered sex, profession and ward to investigate differences in uptake. In addition, in 2020 a survey was developed and distributed to all employees to evaluate flu and COVID-19 vaccines attitudes. (3) Results: during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 flu campaigns the overall VC rate among HCWs was, respectively, 10.2% and 11.9%. In 2020/21 the overall VC rate jumped to 39.3% (+230.6%). Results from the survey indicated a more positive attitude towards flu vaccine as compared to COVID-19 vaccines among the 10.6% of the staff members who responded to the survey. In addition, 70.97% of HCWs totally agreed that being vaccinated against influenza would be more important than the previous years because of COVID-19 emergency. (4) Conclusions: a significant increase in VC was observed in 2020/21, especially among those sub-groups with consistently lower uptake in previous years. The COVID-19 pandemic positively influenced flu vaccination uptake during the 2020/21 season.

Clinical-instrumental investigations, such as electrocardiography (ECG), represent a corollary of a procedures that, nowadays, is called upon as part of the principles of precision medicine. However when carrying out the professional routine examinations, most tend to ignore how a “simple” instrument can offer indispensable support in clinical practice, even in occupational medicine. The advent of the digital age, made of silicon and printed circuit boards, has allowed the miniaturization of the electronic components of these electro-medical devices. Finally, the adoption of patient wearables in medicine has been rapidly expanding worldwide for a number of years. This has been driven mainly by consumers’ demand to monitor their own health. With the ongoing research and development of new features capable of assessing and transmitting real-time biometric data, the impact of wearables on cardiovascular management has become inevitable. Despite the potential offered by this technology, as evident from the scientific literature, the application of these devices in the field of health and safety in the workplace is still limited. This may also be due to the lack of targeted scientific research. While offering great potential, it is very important to consider and evaluate ethical aspects related to the use of these smart devices, such as the management of the collected data relating to the physiological parameters and the location of the worker. This technology is to be considered as being aimed at monitoring the subject’s physiological parameters, and not at the diagnosis of any pathological condition, which should always be on charge of the medical specialist We conducted a review of the evolution of the role that electrophysiology plays as part of occupational health and safety management and on its possible future use, thanks to ongoing technological innovation.

Background Vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) against seasonal influenza is considered the most effective way to protect HCWs and maintain essential healthcare services during influenza epidemics. With the present study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of measures implemented during the three flu campaigns of 2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21 in a university hospital in Pisa, Italy, through the assessment of vaccination coverage (VC) in HCWs and to assess attitudes toward flu vaccination. Methods Flu VC was stratified according to sex, age, job and vaccination status for each season and the association between each variable and vaccination status was explored. In 2020, a survey collecting data on knowledge and attitudes on flu vaccination was distributed. Results Starting from the 2018/19 campaign, an increasing flu VC rate was registered: contained in 2019/20 (from 11.6% to 14.3%, Δ%=23.1) and significant (VC = 39.6%, Δ%=177.6) in 2020/21 as compared with the previous year. Physicians were the professionals most willing to get vaccinated during all seasons. Considering age the situation changed greatly over the study period, with VC rising in 2020/21 in those age groups marked by low VC in previous years (<30 and 41-50 years old, Δ%=293). Having been vaccinated in the previous year represented the most important variable to predict likelihood of accepting flu jab. However, while previously vaccinated HCWs were 13 times more likely to get the flu jab in 2019/20 compared with the others; in 2020/21 they were only 3 times. Only half of HCWS considered themselves at higher risk of contracting influenza compared to the general population, while 71% totally agreed that receiving the flu jab in 2020/21 was more important than the previous years due to COVID. Conclusions A significant increase in VC was observed in 2020/21, especially among those sub-groups with consistently lower uptake in previous years, due to the COVID pandemic that positively influenced vaccination uptake. Key messages • This study evaluates the impact of subsequent flu vaccination campaigns implemented in a large university hospital in Italy through the assessment of flu VC among HCWs. • A significant increase in flu VC among HCWs was observed in 2020/21, especially in those categories characterized by lower VC rates in the previous years, more likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic.