Introduction: The simultaneously increased prevalence of atopic diseases and decreased prevalence of infectious diseases might point to a link between the two entities. Past work mainly focused on either atopic diseases or recurrent infections. We aim to investigate whether risk factors for atopic diseases (ie, asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and/or food allergy) differ from risk factors for recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTIs) in children. Methods: Cross-sectional data were used from 5517 children aged 1 to 18 years who participated in an Electronic Portal for children between 2011 and 2019. Univariable/multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for any atopic disease and RRTIs. Results: Children aged ≥5 years were more likely to have any atopic disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.50-2.77) and less likely to have RRTIs (OR: 0.68-0.84) compared to children aged less than 5 years. Female sex (OR: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.81), low birth weight (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.97) and dog ownership (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.95) reduced the odds of any atopic disease, but not of RRTIs. Daycare attendance (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02-1.47) was associated with RRTIs, but not with atopic diseases. A family history of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and RRTIs was significantly associated with the same entity in children, with OR varying from 1.58 (95% CI: 1.35-1.85) in allergic rhinitis to 2.20 (95% CI: 1.85-2.61) in asthma. Conclusion: Risk factors for atopic diseases are distinct from risk factors for RRTIs, suggesting that the changing prevalence of both entities is not related to shared risk factors.

Background: Hospitalized pediatric oncology patients are at risk of severe clinical deterioration. Yet Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) scores have not been prospectively validated in these patients. We aimed to determine the predictive performance of the modified BedsidePEWS score for unplanned pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in this patient population. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study in an 80-bed pediatric oncology hospital in the Netherlands, where care has been nationally centralized. All hospitalized pediatric oncology patients aged 0-18 years were eligible for inclusion. A Cox proportional hazard model was estimated to study the association between Bedside-PEWS score and unplanned PICU admissions or CPR. The predictive performance of the model was internally validated by bootstrapping. Results: A total of 1137 patients were included. During the study, 103 patients experienced 127 unplanned PICU admissions and three CPRs. The hazard ratio for unplanned PICU admission or CPR was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [

IntroductionHospitalised paediatric oncology patients are at risk to develop acute complications. Early identification of clinical deterioration enabling adequate escalation of care remains challenging. Various Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWSs) have been evaluated, also in paediatric oncology patients but mostly in retrospective or case–control study designs. This study protocol encompasses the first prospective cohort with the aim of evaluating the predictive performance of a modified Bedside PEWS score for non-elective paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission or cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalised paediatric oncology patients.Methods and analysisA prospective cohort study will be conducted at the 80-bed Dutch paediatric oncology hospital, where all national paediatric oncology care has been centralised, directly connected to a shared 22-bed PICU. All patients between 1 February 2019 and 1 February 2021 admitted to the inpatient nursing wards, aged 0–18 years, with an International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) diagnosis of paediatric malignancy will be eligible. A Cox proportional hazard regression model will be used to estimate the association between the modified Bedside PEWS and time to non-elective PICU transfer or cardiopulmonary arrest. Predictive performance (discrimination and calibration) will be assessed internally using resampling validation. To account for multiple occurrences of the event of interest within each patient, the unit of study is a single uninterrupted ward admission (a clinical episode).Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the institutional ethical review board of our hospital (MEC protocol number 16-572/C). We adapted our enrolment procedure to General Data Protection Regulation compliance. Results will be disseminated at scientific conferences, regional educational sessions and publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Registry (NL8957).

No abstract