The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (TIS) was recently developed. Given its novelty, most studies looking into the risk of malignancy (ROM) of serous effusion diagnostic categories were published before the development of TIS. We searched the database of our department for pleural effusions diagnosed in the last five years, excluding those without a corresponding pleural biopsy. Cases were reviewed and reclassified according to the TIS. A cytohistological correlation was performed. In total, 350 pleural effusion specimens with one or more corresponding pleural biopsies were included. After reclassification, 5 (1.43%) were nondiagnostic (ND), 253 (72.29%) were negative for malignancy (NFM), 7 (2.00%) had atypia of unknown significance (AUS), 14 (4.00%) were suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and 71 (20.57%) were malignant (MAL). Calculated ROM was 40% for ND, 20.16% for NFM, 42.86% for AUS, 78.57% for SFM, and 100% for MAL. Effusion cytology sensitivity and specificity were 60.29% and 98.56%, respectively. This is the first publication looking into the cytohistological correlation of a retrospective cohort of pleural effusions based on the TIS. We add to the body of data regarding the ROM for TIS categories, highlighting areas of potential future research.

BackgroundInflammatory pseudotumor is a rare clinical condition that can be related to immunoglobulin G4 disease. Only a few cases of spinal inflammatory pseudotumors have been reported in the literature and an association with immunoglobulin G4 disease was not conclusive in any of them. We describe what we believe to be the first biopsy-proven case of an epidural inflammatory pseudotumor related to immunoglobulin G4 disease.Case presentationA 57-year-old Caucasian woman presented to our hospital with severe paraparesis, gait disturbance, and sensory loss secondary to a relapsing epidural mass. Examination of a biopsy specimen revealed a lymphoplasmacytic infiltration with fibrosis and an immunoglobulin G4-positive plasma cell ratio of over 50 %, which are compatible with a diagnosis of immunoglobulin G4-related inflammatory pseudotumor. Our patient was successfully treated with systemic and epidural administration of glucocorticoids.ConclusionImmunoglobulin G4-related disease is an emerging clinical condition in which central nervous system involvement is still uncommon. We describe the case of a patient with an epidural mass with medullar compression, which was proved to be an immunoglobulin G4-related epidural inflammatory pseudotumor. Our findings suggest a new manifestation of immunoglobulin G4-related disease. This disorder should be considered in the differential diagnosis of spinal tumors as a potentially treatable condition with glucocorticoids.

Spontaneous transsphenoidal meningoencephalcele is a rare entity, even rarer through the Sternberg’s canal, a congenital defect on the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus. We report such a case in an obese 52-year-old female with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea and recurrent meningitis. Brain CT, MRI and CT cisternography were performed. Surgical correction and short-term follow-up were recorded. CT scan showed a defect on the lateral wall of the right sphenoid sinus filled with a soft tissue mass extending to the nasal cavity. MRI scan revealed brain parenchyma from the right temporal lobe herniated through the sphenoid bone defect. CT cisternography showed 270 mmH2O opening pressure and confirmed the CSF leakage. Surgical correction was performed with resolution of the symptoms. MRI and CT are complementary modalities for evaluating this entity, the first being the method of choice for meningoencephalcele diagnosis although bone defects are best depicted on CT scan. CT cisternography identifies the specific site of leak and confirms benign intracranial hypertension, consistently reported in meningoencephaloceles. Obesity and benign intracranial hypertension have been reported as a combined mechanism allegedly contributing to meningoencephaloceles through congenital skull base defects, by increasing intraabdominal pressure thus decreasing venous return, with augmented intracranial pressure and subsequent reduced absorption of the CSF.

Otosclerotic involvement of the middle ear ossicles, apart from footplate, was very rarely mentioned. Most subjects were incidentally diagnosed postmortem by means of examination of specimens from temporal bone collections. The diagnosis and treatment of a patient with otosclerosis of the incus is exceptional; however, otosclerosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of expansible lesions of the ossicles.

BACKGROUND Appendiceal tumors are rare lesions that may not be easily differentiated from primary ovarian lesions preoperatively, despite the use of advanced diagnostic methods by experienced clinicians. CASE SUMMARY A 59-year-old G2P2 woman, with chronic pelvic pain, underwent a pelvic ultrasound that revealed an adnexal mass measuring 58 mm × 34 mm × 36 mm, with irregular borders, heterogeneous echogenicity, no color Doppler vascularization and without acoustic shadowing. Normal ovarian tissue was visualized in contact with the lesion, and it was impossible to separate the lesion from the ovary by applying pressure with the ultrasound probe. Ascites, peritoneal metastases or other alterations were not observed. With the international ovarian tumor analysis ADNEX model, the lesion was classified as a malignant tumor (the risk of malignancy was 27.1%, corresponding to Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System category 4). Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of a right adnexal mass, apparently an ovarian tumor measuring 65 mm × 35 mm, without signs of invasive or metastatic disease. During explorative laparotomy, normal morphology of the internal reproductive organs was noted. A solid mobile lesion involved the entire appendix. Appendectomy was performed. Inspection of the abdominal cavity revealed no signs of malignant dissemination. Histopathologically, the appendiceal lesion corresponded to a completely resected low-grade mucinous appendiceal neoplasm (LAMN). CONCLUSION The appropriate treatment and team of specialists who should provide health care to patients with seemingly adnexal lesions depend on the nature (benign vs malignant) and origin (gynecological vs nongynecological) of the lesion. Radiologists, gynecologists and other pelvic surgeons should be familiar with the imaging signs of LAMN whose clinical presentation is silent or nonspecific. The assistance of a consultant specializing in intestinal tumors is important support that gynecological surgeons can receive during the operation to offer the patient with intestinal pathology an optimal intervention.