Peptide couplers
(also known as amide bond-forming reagents or
coupling reagents) are broadly used in organic chemical syntheses,
especially in the pharmaceutical industry. Yet, occupational health
hazards associated with this chemical class are largely unexplored,
which is disconcerting given the intrinsic reactivity of these compounds.
Several case studies involving occupational exposures reported adverse
respiratory and dermal health effects, providing initial evidence
of chemical sensitization. To address the paucity of toxicological
data, a pharmaceutical cross-industry task force was formed to evaluate
and assess the potential of these compounds to cause eye and dermal
irritation as well as corrosivity and dermal sensitization. The goal
of our work was to inform health and safety professionals as well
as pharmaceutical and organic chemists of the occupational health
hazards associated with this chemical class. To that end, 25 of the
most commonly used peptide couplers and five hydrolysis products were
selected for
in vivo, in vitro
, and
in silico
testing. Our findings confirmed that dermal sensitization is a concern
for this chemical class with 21/25 peptide couplers testing positive
for dermal sensitization and 15 of these being strong/extreme sensitizers.
We also found that dermal corrosion and irritation (8/25) as well
as eye irritation (9/25) were health hazards associated with peptide
couplers and their hydrolysis products (4/5 were dermal irritants
or corrosive and 4/5 were eye irritants). Resulting outcomes were
synthesized to inform decision making in peptide coupler selection
and enable data-driven hazard communication to workers. The latter
includes harmonized hazard classifications, appropriate handling recommendations,
and accurate safety data sheets, which support the industrial hygiene
hierarchy of control strategies and risk assessment. Our study demonstrates
the merits of an integrated,
in vivo
-
in
silico
analysis, applied here to the skin sensitization endpoint
using the Computer-Aided Discovery and REdesign (CADRE) and Derek
Nexus programs. We show that experimental data can improve predictive
models by filling existing data gaps while, concurrently, providing
computational insights into key initiating events and elucidating
the chemical structural features contributing to adverse health effects.
This interactive, interdisciplinary approach is consistent with Green
Chemistry principles that seek to improve the selection and design
of less hazardous reagents in industrial processes and applications.
Model reliability is generally assessed and reported as an intrinsic component of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) publications; it can be evaluated using defined quality criteria such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) principles for the validation of QSARs. However, less emphasis is afforded to the assessment of model reproducibility, particularly by users who may wish to use model outcomes for decision making, but who are not QSAR experts. In this study we identified a range of QSARs in the area of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) prediction and assessed their adherence to the OECD principles, as well as investigating their reproducibility by scientists without expertise in QSAR. Here, 85 papers were reviewed, reporting over 80 models for 31 ADME-related endpoints. Of these, 12 models were identified that fulfilled at least 4 of the 5 OECD principles and 3 of these 12 could be readily reproduced. Published QSAR models should aim to meet a standard level of quality and be clearly communicated, ensuring their reproducibility, to progress the uptake of the models in both research and regulatory landscapes. A pragmatic workflow for implementing published QSAR models and recommendations to modellers, for publishing models with greater usability, are presented herein.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.