BackgroundUnresolved inflammation resulting in capillary leakage with endothelial barrier dysfunction is a major contributor to postoperative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Angiopoietins (ANGs) are vascular growth factors, also mediating inflammation and disruption of the endothelium, thus inducing capillary leakage. We hypothesized that changes in the relative serum levels of ANG1 and ANG2 influence endothelial barrier function and perioperative morbidity after CABG.MethodsAfter approval and informed consent, serum samples (n = 28) were collected pre CABG surgery, 1, 6, and 24 h after aortic de-clamping. ANG1, ANG2, soluble ANG receptor TIE2 (sTIE2), and IL-6 serum concentrations were analyzed by ELISA. Human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs) were incubated with patient serum and FITC-dextran permeability was assessed. Furthermore, ANG2 secretion of HPMECs was analyzed after incubation with IL-6-containing patient serum.ResultsCABG induced an early and sustained increase of ANG2/ANG1 ratio (5-fold after 24 h compared to pre-surgery). These changes correlated with elevated serum lactate levels, fluid balance, as well as the duration of mechanical ventilation. Permeability of HPMECs significantly increased after incubation with post-surgery serum showing a marked shift of ANG2/ANG1 balance (18-fold) compared to serum with a less pronounced increase (6-fold). Furthermore, CABG resulted in increased IL-6 serum content. Pre-incubation with serum containing high levels of IL-6 amplified the ANG2 secretion by HPMECs; however, this was not influenced by blocking IL-6.ConclusionsCABG affects the balance between ANG1 and ANG2 towards a dominance of the barrier-disruptive ANG2. Our data suggest that this ANG2/ANG1 imbalance contributes to an increased postoperative endothelial permeability, likewise being reflected by the clinical course. The results strongly suggest a biological effect of altered angiopoietin balance during cardiac surgery on endothelial permeability.

Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 affect many organs, including the heart. Cardiovascular disease is a dominant comorbidity and prognostic factors predicting risk for critical courses are highly needed. Moreover, immunomechanisms underlying COVID-induced myocardial damage are poorly understood. Objective To elucidate prognostic markers to identify patients at risk. Results Only patients with pericardial effusion (PE) developed a severe disease course, and those who died could be identified by a high CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio. Ten out of 19 COVID-19 patients presented with PE, 7 (78%) of these had elevated APACHE-II mortality risk-score, requiring mechanical ventilation. At admission, PE patients showed signs of systemic and cardiac inflammation in NMR and impaired cardiac function as detected by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), whereas parameters of myocardial injury e.g. high sensitive troponin-t (hs-TnT) were not yet increased. During the course of disease, hs-TnT rose in 8 of the PE-patients above 16 ng/l, 7 had to undergo ventilatory therapy and 4 of them died. FACS at admission showed in PE patients elevated frequencies of CD3 + CD8 + T cells among all CD3+ T-cells, and lower frequencies of Tregs and CD14 + HLA − DR + -monocytes. A high CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio predicted a severe disease course in PE patients, and was associated with high serum levels of antiviral cytokines. By contrast, patients without PE and PE patients with a low CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio neither had to be intubated, nor died. Conclusions PE predicts cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, TTE should be performed at admission. Immunological parameters for dysfunctional antiviral immunity, such as the CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio used here, supports risk assessment by predicting poor prognosis.

Introduction Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is a severe and complex disease that is often linked to diverse, possible complications. Without appropriate surgical treatment approximately 75% of all patients die within 14 days after the onset of symptoms. 1 Because of advances in surgery, anesthesia and medical therapy postoperative outcome is steadily improving. 2-4 Most published literature concerns about surgical outcome, survival of patients, and complications leading to disability. Postoperative QoL comparing physical and psychological status is rarely considered in this view. The following article concerns about long-term outcome and quality of life (QoL) after AADA, and focuses on the changes of QoL concerning physical and mental status. Methods Patient Selection From January 1, 1999, until December 31, 2006, 120 patients received an emergency operation for Stanford type A aortic dissection. All patients were recorded and were asked to answer an SF-36 questionnaire during routine follow-up (FU). Four patients refused FU and seven were lost to FU resulting in 109 patients for this study group. Data Collection Dataset was acquired using SF-36 QoL questionnaire. The first SF-36 questionnaire (FU I) was obtained within 45 AE 32 months after surgery, the second (FU II), 46 AE 10 months thereafter. Some of the patients could not show up for their Keywords ► aortic dissection ► SF-36 ► quality of life ► long-term outcome

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures. METHODS Forty departments shared their data on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures between January and May 2020 and January and May 2019 in Europe, Asia and the USA. Admission rates as well as delay from onset of symptoms to referral were compared. RESULTS No differences in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures were observed between 2020 and the reference period in 2019 [incidence rates ratio (IRR): 0.96, confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.04; P = 0.39]. Also, no difference in the time interval from acute onset of symptoms to referral was recorded (<12 h 32% vs > 12 h 68% in 2020, < 12 h 34% vs > 12 h 66% in 2019 P = 0.29). Conversely, a decline of 35% in elective procedures was seen (IRR: 0.81, CI 0.76–0.87; P < 0.001) with substantial differences between countries and the most pronounced decline in Italy (−40%, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in Switzerland, an increase in the number of elective cases was observed (+35%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS There was no change in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic cases and procedures during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the case load of elective operations and procedures decreased significantly. Patients with acute aortic syndromes presented despite COVID-19 and were managed according to current guidelines. Further analysis is required to prove that deferral of elective cases had no impact on premature mortality.