Soil pathogens are believed to be major contributors to negative plant–soil feedbacks that regulate plant community dynamics and plant invasions. While the theoretical basis for pathogen regulation of plant communities is well established within the plant–soil feedback framework, direct experimental evidence for pathogen community responses to plants has been limited, often relying largely on indirect evidence based on above-ground plant responses. As a result, specific soil pathogen responses accompanying above-ground plant community dynamics are largely unknown. Here, we examine the oomycete pathogens in soils conditioned by established populations of native noninvasive and non-native invasive haplotypes of Phragmites australis (European common reed). Our aim was to assess whether populations of invasive plants harbor unique communities of pathogens that differ from those associated with noninvasive populations and whether the distribution of taxa within these communities may help to explain invasive success. We compared the composition and abundance of pathogenic and saprobic oomycete species over a 2-year period. Despite a diversity of oomycete taxa detected in soils from both native and non-native populations, pathogen communities from both invaded and noninvaded soils were dominated by species of Pythium. Pathogen species that contributed the most to the differences observed between invaded and noninvaded soils were distributed between invaded and noninvaded soils. However, the specific taxa in invaded soils responsible for community differences were distinct from those in noninvaded soils that contributed to community differences. Our results indicate that, despite the phylogenetic relatedness of native and non-native P. australis haplotypes, pathogen communities associated with the dominant non-native haplotype are distinct from those of the rare native haplotype. Pathogen taxa that dominate either noninvaded or invaded soils suggest different potential mechanisms of invasion facilitation. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that non-native plant species that dominate landscapes may “cultivate” a different soil pathogen community to their rhizosphere than those of rarer native species.

Peronosporomycete (oomycete) communities inhabiting the rhizospheres of three plant species were characterized and compared to determine whether communities obtained by direct soil DNA extractions (soil communities) differ from those obtained using baiting techniques (bait communities). Using two sets of Peronosporomycete-specific primers, a portion of the 5' region of the large subunit (28S) rRNA gene was amplified from DNA extracted either directly from rhizosphere soil or from hempseed baits floated for 48 h over rhizosphere soil. Amplicons were cloned, sequenced, and then subjected to phylogenetic and diversity analyses. Both soil and bait communities arising from DNA amplified with a Peronosporomycetidae-biased primer set (Oom1) were dominated by Pythium species. In contrast, communities arising from DNA amplified with a Saprolegniomycetidae-biased primer set (Sap2) were dominated by Aphanomyces species. Neighbor-joining analyses revealed the presence of additional taxa that could not be identified with known Peronosporomycete species represented in GenBank. Sequence diversity and mean sequence divergence (Theta pi) within bait communities were lower than the diversity within soil communities. Furthermore, the composition of Peronosporomycete communities differed among the three fields sampled and between bait and soil communities based on F(st) and parsimony tests. The results of our study represent a significant advance in the study of Peronosporomycetes in terrestrial habitats. Our work has shown the utility of culture-independent approaches using 28S rRNA genes to assess the diversity of Peronosporomycete communities in association with plants. It also reveals the presence of potentially new species of Peronosporomycetes in soils and plant rhizospheres.

Soil pathogens affect plant community structure and function through negative plant–soil feedbacks that may contribute to the invasiveness of non-native plant species. Our understanding of these pathogen-induced soil feedbacks has relied largely on observations of the collective impact of the soil biota on plant populations, with few observations of accompanying changes in populations of specific soil pathogens and their impacts on invasive and noninvasive species. As a result, the roles of specific soil pathogens in plant invasions remain unknown. In this study, we examine the diversity and virulence of soil oomycete pathogens in freshwater wetland soils invaded by non-native Phragmites australis (European common reed) to better understand the potential for soil pathogen communities to impact a range of native and non-native species and influence invasiveness. We isolated oomycetes from four sites over a 2-year period, collecting nearly 500 isolates belonging to 36 different species. These sites were dominated by species of Pythium, many of which decreased seedling survival of a range of native and invasive plants. Despite any clear host specialization, many of the Pythium species were differentially virulent to the native and non-native plant species tested. Isolates from invaded and noninvaded soils were equally virulent to given individual plant species, and no apparent differences in susceptibility were observed between the collective groups of native and non-native plant species.

Within minutes of Bdeiovibrio bacteriovorus attack on prey cells, such as Escherichia coli, the cytoplasmic membrane of the prey is altered. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of purified invaded prey cell (bdelloplast) membranes revealed the appearance of a noncytoplasmic membrane protein. This protein is not observed in preparations of noninvaded E. coli membranes and migrates in a manner similar to that of E. coli OmpF. Isoelectric focusing and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of bdelloplast cytoplasmic membrane preparations also revealed the presence of a protein with electrophoretic properties similar to those of OmpF and the major Bdellovibrio outer membrane proteins. The protein appears in cytoplasmic membrane preparations within minutes of attack and persists throughout most of the intraperiplasmic developmental cycle. The appearance of this protein is consistent with our hypothesis that bdellovibrios translocate a pore protein into the bdelloplast cytoplasmic membrane to kill their prey and to gain access to the cytoplasmic contents for growth.A critical feature of bdellovibrio intraperiplasmic growth is the event which renders the membrane-bound contents of the prey cytoplasm available to the bdellovibrios. The mechanism by which bdellovibrios gain access to prey cytoplasmic constituents has been linked to an alteration of the cytoplasmic membrane of the prey moments after attachment. Damage to the cytoplasmic membrane renders it permeable to small hydrophilic molecules and ions and disrupts the proton gradient, thereby inhibiting respiration and killing the prey cell (9, 16). Electron microscopy has shown that the prey cytoplasmic membrane remains physically intact during bdellovibrio penetration and growth (1, 3). The damage to the membrane, therefore, appears to compromise its functional integrity without extensively altering its physical construction.A potential model for cytoplasmic membrane alteration is the bdellovibrio-mediated insertion of a pore protein into the cytoplasmic membrane of the prey cell. A channel-forming protein inserted nonspecifically into the phospholipid bilayer of the cytoplasmic membrane of the prey cell would permit passage of cytoplasmic components into the periplasm and disrupt the proton gradient without significantly impairing the physical integrity of the membrane. Parasite-mediated insertion of proteins into the cell membranes of their hosts has already been demonstrated for both bacterial and eukaryotic pathogens (2,12,18,23