In two experiments, college students performed a feature-positive or a feature-negative discrimination task based on colors or symbols and were then transferred to a feature-positive or feature-negative discrimination based on the other stimulus dimension (symbols-colors, colors-symbols). Initial task results yielded a substantial feature-positive effect and indicated that the color task was easier than the symbol task. Transfer task results indicated that the feature-positive effect was maintained and showed that consistent transfer (positive-positive, negative-negative) led to superior performance on the transfer task. These results were obtained when the correct solution to the initial task was provided to the subject prior to transfer (Experiment 1) and when it was not (Experiment 2). These results systematically replicated the existence of the feature-positive effect in adult humans and showed that both feature-positive and feature-negative discrimination learning were facilitated by consistent examples of these problems.

No abstract

In three experiments, adult humans were tested in a feature-positive or feature-negative simultaneous symbol task. In Experiment 1, some persons focused on the correct side of the stimulus cards, whereas other persons focused on the not-correct side of the stimulus cards. The feature-positive group learned faster than the feature-negative group did in the correct side condition; the feature-negative group learned faster than the feature-positive group did in the not-correct side condition. In Experiments 2 and 3, all persons focused on both the correct and not-correct sides of the stimulus cards. Under these circumstances, feature-positive and feature-negative performances were comparable. These results indicated that the usual superiority of feature-positive over feature-negative learning results from a tendency to attend to only a portion of the stimulus array.