IntroductionIn January 2010, the Virginia Department of Health received reports of 2 hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections (1 acute, 1 chronic) among residents of a single assisted living facility (ALF). Both infected residents had diabetes and received assisted monitoring of blood glucose (AMBG) at the facility. An investigation was initiated in response.ObjectiveTo determine the extent and mechanism of HBV transmission among ALF residents.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingAn ALF that primarily housed residents with neuropsychiatric disorders in 2 adjacent buildings in Virginia.ParticipantsResidents of the facility as of March 2010.MeasurementsHBV serologic testing, relevant medical history, and HBV genome sequences. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to identify risk factors for HBV infection.ResultsHBV serologic status was determined for 126 (91%) of 139 residents. Among 88 susceptible residents, 14 became acutely infected (attack rate, 16%), and 74 remained uninfected. Acute HBV infection developed among 12 (92%) of 13 residents who received AMBG, compared with 2 (3%) of 75 residents who did not (RR  = 35; 95% CI, 8.7, 137). Identified infection control breaches during AMBG included shared use of fingerstick devices for multiple residents. HBV genome sequencing demonstrated 2 building-specific phylogenetic infection clusters, each having 99.8–100% sequence identity.LimitationsTransfer of residents out of the facility prior to our investigation might have contributed to an underestimate of cases. Resident interviews provided insufficient information to fully assess behavioral risk factors for HBV infection.ConclusionsFailure to adhere to safe practices during AMBG resulted in a large HBV outbreak. Protection of a growing and vulnerable ALF population requires improved training of staff and routine facility licensing inspections that scrutinize infection control practices.

Despite outreach and long-standing recommendations, approximately 1 in 6 facilities shared fingerstick devices, and more than one-third of ALFs surveyed were considered noncompliant with federal guidelines (Occupational Safety and Health Administration Bloodborne Pathogens Standard). Public health and licensing agencies should work with ALFs to implement infection control measures and prevent disease transmission.

Unsafe practices are an underestimated contributor to the disease burden of bloodborne viruses. Outbreaks associated with failures in basic infection prevention have been identified in nonhospital settings with increased frequency in the United States during the past 15 years, representing an alarming trend and indicating that the challenge of providing consistently safe care is not always met. As has been the case with most medical specialties, there have been public health investigations by state and local health departments, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have identified some instances of unsafe practices that have placed podiatric medical patients at risk for viral, bacterial, and fungal infections. All health-care providers, including podiatric physicians, must make infection prevention a priority in any setting in which care is delivered.

Background: Three patients attending a hemodialysis unit were diagnosed with acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We investigated the scope and mode of transmission. Methods: Patients and staff were tested to determine HCV infection status; all HCV-RNA-positive sera underwent quasispecies analysis to assess genetic relatedness. Staff practices were evaluated via interviews and observations. A cohort study was performed to assess risk factors for incident HCV infection. Results: HCV infection was documented at time of hire or unit admission for 2 staff and 12 patients (prevalent case-patients). Seven (13%) of 52 patients HCV susceptible at admission to the unit subsequently acquired HCV infection (incident case-patients). Analysis of HCV quasispecies from the hyper variable region 1 identified 2 separate clusters each containing 3 incident case-patients and 1 prevalent case-patient. Incident case-patients received a higher median number of intravenous medications per dialysis session compared to susceptible patients (2.1 vs 1.8, p-value = 0.0606). Only one incident case-patient received dialysis on the same machine as their genetically related prevalent case-patient. Preparation of injection medications at the dialysis station on a mobile medication cart, and failures to clean environmental surfaces between patients were infection control breaches identified as likely modes of HCV transmission. Conclusions: Epidemiologic and laboratory data revealed transmission of HCV among patients at the same dialysis unit. Transmission was most likely related to infection control breaches. Our findings reinforce the risk of patient-to-patient HCV transmission in hemodialysis units when staff fails to adhere to recommended infection control practices.

Unsafe practices are an underestimated contributor to the disease burden of bloodborne viruses. Outbreaks associated with failures in basic infection prevention have been identified in nonhospital settings with increased frequency in the United States during the past 15 years, representing an alarming trend and indicating that the challenge of providing consistently safe care is not always met. As has been the case with most medical specialties, public health investigations by state and local health departments, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, have identified some instances of unsafe practices that have placed podiatric medical patients at risk for viral, bacterial, and fungal infections. All health-care providers, including podiatric physicians, must make infection prevention a priority in any setting in which care is delivered.