Health disparities based on race and socioeconomic status are a serious problem in the US health care system, but disparities in outcomes related to traumatic injury have received relatively little attention in the research literature.This study uses data from the State Inpatient Database for Michigan including all trauma-related hospital admissions in the period from 2006 to 2014 in the Detroit metropolitan area (N = 407,553) to examine the relationship between race (White N = 232,109; African American N = 86,356, Hispanic N = 2709, Other N = 10,623), socioeconomic background, and in-hospital trauma mortality.Compared with other groups, there was a higher risk of mortality after trauma among African Americans (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, P < .001), people living in high-poverty neighborhoods (OR = 1.01, P < .001), and those enrolled in public health insurance programs (OR = 1.53, P < .001). African American patients were more likely to have had traumatic injuries caused by certain mechanisms with higher risk of death (P < .001). After controlling for mechanism alone in multiple logistic regression, African American race remained a significant predictor of mortality risk (OR = 1.12, P < .001). After additionally controlling for the socioeconomic factors of insurance status and neighborhood poverty levels, there were no longer any significant differences between racial groups in terms of mortality (OR = 0.99, P = .746).These results suggest that in this population the racial inequalities in mortality outcomes were fully mediated by differences between groups in the pattern of injuries suffered and differences in risk based on socioeconomic factors.

ObjectiveDisparities in treatment outcomes for traumatic injury are an important concern for care providers and policy makers. Factors that may influence these disparities include differences in risk exposure based on neighbourhood of residence and differences in quality of care between hospitals in different areas. This study examines geographical disparities within a single region: the Detroit metropolitan area.DesignData on all trauma admissions between 2006 and 2014 were obtained from the Michigan State Inpatient Database. Admissions were grouped by patient neighbourhood of residence and admitting hospital. Generalised linear mixed modelling procedures were used to determine the extent of shared variance based on these two levels of categorisation on three outcomes. Patients with trauma due to common mechanisms (falls, firearms and motor vehicle traffic) were examined as additional subgroups.Setting66 hospitals admitting patients for traumatic injury in the Detroit metropolitan area during the period from 2006 to 2014.Participants404 675 adult patients admitted for treatment of traumatic injury.Outcome measuresIn-hospital mortality, length of stay and hospital charges.ResultsIntraclass correlation coefficients indicated that there was substantial shared variance in outcomes based on hospital, but not based on neighbourhood of residence. Among all injury types, hospital-level differences accounted for 12.5% of variance in mortality risk, 28.5% of variance in length of stay and 32.2% of variance in hospital charges. Adjusting the results for patient age, injury severity, mechanism and comorbidities did not result in significant reduction in the estimated variance at the hospital level.ConclusionsBased on these data, geographical disparities in trauma treatment outcomes were more strongly attributable to differences in access to quality hospital care than to risk factors in the neighbourhood environment. Transfer of high-risk cases to hospitals with greater institutional experience in the relevant area may help address mortality disparities in particular.

This study validated the hypothesis that comorbid psychiatric conditions are a significant risk factor for recurrent neurotrauma and validate prior studies showing gender and race as significant risk factors.