Objective: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant treatments (ADTs) in patients with major depressive disorder (as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria) with inadequate response to ADTs. Method: Patients still depressed despite 1-3 prior ADTs followed by 8 weeks of prospective physician-determined, open-label ADT were randomized (1:1:1) to double-blind brexpiprazole 3 mg/d, brexpiprazole 1 mg/d, or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 6. The key secondary efficacy end point was change in Sheehan Disability Scale mean score. The Hochberg procedure corrected for multiplicity. The efficacy population comprised all patients who had ≥ 1 dose of study drug with baseline and ≥ 1 postrandomization MADRS scores; the efficacy population per final protocol consisted of efficacy population patients meeting amended criteria for inadequate response throughout the 8-week prospective ADT. The study was conducted between June 2011 and September 2013. Results: In the efficacy population per final protocol, brexpiprazole 3 mg (n = 213) showed a greater improvement in MADRS total score versus placebo (n = 203; −8.29 vs −6.33; P = .0079), whereas brexpiprazole 1 mg did not (n = 211; −7.64 vs −6.33; P = .0737). The brexpiprazole groups showed comparable improvement in SDS mean score versus placebo (least squares [LS] mean difference: [1 mg] −0.49, P = .0158; [3 mg] −0.48, P = .0191). The most frequent adverse events were akathisia (4.4%, 13.5%, 2.3%), headache (9.3%, 6.1%, 7.7%), and weight increase (6.6%, 5.7%, 0.9%) in brexpiprazole 1-mg, 3-mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (LS mean difference = 0.08, P = .0141) and Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (LS mean difference = 0.17, P = .0001) total scores were significantly greater with brexpiprazole 3 mg versus placebo. causing loss of productivity and increased mortality. 3 Although numerous antidepressant treatments (ADTs) are available, a significant minority of people suffering from MDD do not respond to first-line therapies.6,7 Treatment options following inadequate ADT response include changing to another ADTeither within the same class or in another ADT class-or augmenting ADT with another medication, such as a second-generation antipsychotic. 6,8 In the United States, adjunctive aripiprazole and quetiapine are currently approved in MDD, while olanzapine combined with fluoxetine is approved for patients with treatment-resistant depression. Although efficacy has been established in many randomized controlled trials, tolerability profiles of these agents limit their clinical use.9,10 Side effects vary between medications but most commonly include akathisia for aripiprazole, increased appetite/weight gain for olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, and excessive sedation for quetiapine.
11Weight gain can be a particularly ominous side effect because it...