DNp63a, implicated as an oncogene, is upregulated by activated Akt, part of a well-known cell survival pathway. Inhibition of Akt activation by phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) and the presence of putative p63-binding sites in the pten promoter led us to investigate whether DNp63a regulates PTEN expression. Knockdown of DNp63a led to increases in PTEN levels and loss of activated Akt, while overexpression of DNp63a decreased PTEN levels and elevated active Akt. The repression of PTEN by DNp63a occurs independently of p53 status, as loss of DNp63a increases PTEN expression in cell lines with and without functional p53. In addition, decreased levels of DNp63a resulted in an increase in nuclear PTEN. Conversely, in vivo nuclear PTEN was absent in the proliferative basal layer of the epidermis where DNp63a expression is highest. Additionally, we show that in keratinocytes a balance between DNp63a and PTEN regulates Akt activation and maintains normal proliferation rates. This balance is disrupted in non-melanoma skin cancers through increased DNp63a levels, and could enhance proliferation and subsequent neoplastic development. Our studies show that DNp63a negatively regulates PTEN, thereby providing a feedback loop between PTEN, Akt and DNp63a, which has an integral role in skin cancer development. Cell Death and Differentiation (2011) 18, 1924-1933 doi:10.1038/cdd.2011; published online 3 June 2011The p53 transcription factor family consists of the tumor suppressor p53 and the homologous p63 and p73. Unlike p53, p63 is essential for normal epidermal stratification and the proliferative potential of the epithelial stem cells. 1,2 p63 exists as various isoforms with contrasting functions. 2 The TA isoforms (TAp63a, TAp63b and TAp63g) have a full-length N-terminal transactivation domain, whereas the DN isoforms (DNp63a, DNp63b and DNp63g) have a short but distinct transactivation domain. All isoforms have a DNA-binding domain that shares high homology with p53 that allows p63 proteins to bind to p53 DNA-binding sites. 3,4 Similar to p53, the TA isoforms of p63 and p73 can promote apoptosis and growth arrest through the induction of antiproliferative genes. In contrast, the DN isoforms have been shown to induce pro-survival genes and inhibit anti-proliferative genes. [4][5][6] Several studies indicate that DNp63a, the predominant isoform in adult tissue, may function as an oncogene as it can exert a dominant-negative effect over p53 and the TAp63 and TAp73 isoforms. 2 Additionally, DNp63a is frequently overexpressed in a variety of squamous cell (SCC) and basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). 7,8 The survival factor Akt can increase DNp63a levels and in turn, DNp63a protects against UV-B-induced apoptosis via Akt activation. 9,10 However, the mechanism behind the positive feedback loop between DNp63a and Akt has not been described. Akt activation can be negated by phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN). PTEN dephosphorylates phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, thereby...

The p63 transcription factor has a pivotal role in epithelial morphogenesis. Multiple transcripts of the TP63 gene are generated because of alternative promoter usage and splicing. ΔNp63α is the predominant isoform of p63 observed during epithelial morphogenesis and in human cancers. Loss of ΔNp63α expression has been shown to promote invasiveness in a subset of human cancer cell lines. Here, we studied whether the regulation of VDR by ΔNp63α controls the invasiveness of an epidermoid cancer cell line. We demonstrate that VDR expression is induced by all p63 isoforms, including ΔNp63α. Endogenous ΔNp63α protein was observed to bind to the VDR promoter, and silencing of endogenous ΔNp63α resulted in diminished VDR expression. Although silencing of p63 inhibits VDR expression leading to an increase in cell migration, overexpression of p63 or VDR results in reduced cell migration as a result of increased VDR expression. Therefore, it is conceivable that p63 inhibits cell invasion by regulating VDR expression. Finally, we observed that expression of p63 and VDR overlaps in the wild-type mouse skin, but a reduced or complete absence of VDR expression was observed in skin from p63-null mice and in p63-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts. In conclusion, we demonstrate a direct transcriptional regulation of VDR by ΔNp63α. Our results highlight a crucial role for VDR in p63-mediated biological functions.

The NME family of proteins is composed of 10 isoforms, designated NME1-10, which are diverse in their enzymatic activities and patterns of subcellular localization. Each contains a conserved domain associated with a nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK) function, although not all are catalytically active. Several of the NME isoforms (NME1, NME5, NME7, and NME8) also exhibit a 3′–5′ exonuclease activity, suggesting roles in DNA proofreading and repair. NME1 and NME2 have been shown to translocate to the nucleus, although they lack a canonical nuclear localization signal. Binding of NME1 and NME2 to DNA does not appear to be sequence-specific in a strict sense, but instead is directed to single-stranded regions and/or other non-B-form structures. NME1 and NME2 have been identified as potential canonical transcription factors that regulate gene transcription through their DNA-binding activities. Indeed, the NME1 and NME2 isoforms have been shown to regulate gene expression programs in a number of cellular settings, and this regulatory function has been proposed to underlie their well-recognized ability to suppress the metastatic phenotype of cancer cells. Moreover, NME1 and, more recently, NME3, have been implicated in repair of both single- and double-stranded breaks in DNA. This suggests that reduced expression of NME proteins could contribute to the genomic instability that drives cancer progression. Clearly, a better understanding of the nuclear functions of NME1 and possibly other NME isoforms could provide critical insights into mechanisms underlying malignant progression in cancer. Indeed, clinical data indicate that the subcellular localization of NME1 may be an important prognostic marker in some cancers. This review summarizes putative functions of nuclear NME proteins in DNA binding, transcription, and DNA damage repair, and highlights their possible roles in cancer progression.

Wound healing is a complex, multistep process that can be summarized into three stages, namely, hemostasis and inflammation, proliferation, and finally, tissue remodeling. Battlefield wound healing demands rapid hemostasis using clotting or cauterizing agents to immediately limit blood loss, but this occurs at the expense of proper tissue repair beyond hemostasis. Layered silicate clays such as kaolin and montmorillonite (MMT) have been previously shown to induce blood clotting due to their ability to form charged interactions with clotting factors. The charge characteristics of sodium MMT (Na-MMT) also enable functionalization with active biomolecules. Herein we functionalized Na-MMT with epidermal growth factor (EGF) via ion exchange reaction to create a nanocomposite (MMT-EGF) with approximately 0.004 EGF molecules per Na(+) exchange site and conduct biochemical analyses of keratinocytes after treatment with MMT-EGF. Our results demonstrate that EGF immobilized on MMT retains the ability to activate the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGRF), causing phosphorylation of the AKT and MEK1 pathways, as well as upregulation of its downstream target gene expression involved in cell growth and migration. This study also shows that like EGF, MMT-EGF treatment can stimulate cell migration in vitro, which is dependent on ERK1/2 phosphorylation.

1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VD3), a secosteriod that has been explored as an anti-cancer agent, was also shown to promote cell survival. Its receptor, the Vitamin D Receptor (VDR), is a direct target of the proto-oncogene ΔNp63α, which is overexpressed in non-melanoma skin cancers. The interconnection between VDR/VD3 signaling and ΔNp63α, led us to examine whether VDR/VD3 signaling promotes keratinocyte proliferation by regulating ΔNp63α levels. Our data demonstrate that VDR regulates ΔNp63α expression at both the transcript and protein level. Interestingly, although low doses of VD3 led to an increase in ΔNp63α protein levels and keratinocyte proliferation, high doses of VD3 failed to increase ΔNp63α protein levels and resulted in reduced proliferation. Increased expression of ΔNp63α by low dose VD3 was shown to be dependent on VDR and critical for the proliferative effects of VD3. VD3-mediated increases in ΔNp63α protein levels occur via activation of both p38 MAPK and Akt kinases. Finally, analysis of samples from patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), basal cell carcinoma and precursors to invasive SCC demonstrated a significant correlation between p63 and VDR levels when compared with healthy normal skin control samples. Delineation of the mechanisms by which VD3 exerts its effect on ΔNp63α and cell proliferation is critical for determining the future of VD3 in cancer therapies.