PurposeUnintended pregnancy and HIV infection present dual risks for young women in sub-Saharan Africa. New multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are in development to simultaneously prevent unintended pregnancy and HIV, but there is a need for end-user research to ensure these products suit women’s needs. The Tablet, Rings and Injectables as Options (TRIO) for women study took place in Kisumu, Kenya, and Soshanguve, South Africa, with the goal of eliciting young women’s feedback on three potential MPTs.MethodsWomen in TRIO used three placebo products that represented potential MPTs: daily oral tablets, monthly vaginal rings, and monthly dual injections in a randomized crossover design followed by a period in which they chose a product to use. Eighty-eight TRIO participants completed in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to understand their experiences using each product. Qualitative analyses were conducted after stratifying by product preference at the end of the crossover period.ResultsThe majority (65%) of participants preferred injections, with the remainder evenly split between tablets and rings. Discussions of preference for one product were closely linked with expressed dislike of another product’s attributes. Participants recognized heterogeneity in preferences and choices across users and stressed the need for multiple MPT options that confer a low burden on women’s daily lives.ConclusionRather than choosing a product to use based on the product’s perceived advantages, women’s choices were based on the unfavorable attributes of other TRIO products. Moreover, the importance that women placed on a given disadvantage varied. Disadvantages that women deemed as most important emerged as a greater driver of product preference than selecting products based on their advantages and favorable characteristics.

Unintended pregnancy and unmet need for modern contraception contribute substantially to reproductive health disparities globally. In sub-Saharan Africa they occur in contexts of disproportionately high rates of HIV infection. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) can address HIV and pregnancy prevention needs in a single "2-in-1" product; however, few studies have solicited end-user views to inform design of new MPTs. We conducted the Tablets, Ring, Injections as Options (TRIO) study with young women aged 18−30 in Kenya and South Africa (N = 277) to examine preferences and acceptability of future MPTs. In a randomised clinical cross-over study in which women used three placebo delivery forms, we complemented quantitative acceptability assessments with in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (N = 88 participants). We examined anticipated enablers and barriers to adoption and use of future MPTs and synthesised novel product design recommendations. Participants expressed high interest in MPTs. Anticipated side effects constituted a primary concern; however, many expected barriers were not dosage form-specific, but addressed contextual factors instead, such as fears regarding use of new biomedical technologies, misunderstandings and stigma regarding use, and navigating partner disclosure and engagement. Women preferred MPTs that offered discreetness and long-duration protection to minimise user-burden, did not interfere with their relationships, and conferred protection for unanticipated situations. End-user research to identify and pre-emptively address potential barriers while underscoring benefits to a new MPT product is vital. Attention to cultural contexts in implementation of new MPTs is important to communicating perceived benefits, achieving acceptability and maximising public health benefits.

Several formulations of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have shown varying levels of effectiveness in women. Little information is known about preference across formulations, especially among product experienced women. Seventy-one women (48% married; median age 26; range 18-45) who were participating in a vaginal ring trial for HIV prevention in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe underwent an in-depth interview at their last study visit, during which they were presented with pictures and descriptions of nine possible product formulations (male and female condoms, oral tablets, injectables, implants, and a vaginal gel, ring, insert, and film). Each formulation was discussed, highlighting salient attribute(s) and contextual factors that may have informed stated preferences. Participants expressed most interest for long-acting PrEP formulations (rings, 94%; implants, 39%; injections, 34%), which were generally favored over short-acting ones. Participants appreciated the continuous protection offered, discreet usage, and the advantage of ''peace of mind'' imparted by simplified use and infrequent dosing, alleviating worries around forgetting doses. Preferred attributes of short-acting formulations included reversibility, user control, ease of administration, and low toxicity. Participants were least interested in the oral tablets (due to the daily dosing, difficulty swallowing pills, and HIV-related stigma), and the vaginal gel and film (due to vaginal insertion, coital dosing, effect on sex. and unfamiliarity with the method). Dislike for vaginally administered products was more pronounced among young women. Multiple factors played into potential users' considerations for preferred formulations, emphasizing how a suite of options for prevention might best respond to women's needs and wants.

No abstract

IntroductionImplants are a new dosage form in development for HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with potential for high adherence given that they are provider‐administered and are intended for long‐acting protection. Integrating end‐user preference into early stage product development may further overcome challenges with future product uptake and adherence. Hence, we sought to optimize the design of a PrEP implant in early‐stage development by gathering opinions about implant attributes from potential end‐users in South Africa.MethodsWe conducted 14 focus group discussions (FGDs) with young women and men aged 18 to 24 in Cape Town and Soshanguve, South Africa, inviting participants into discussion as co‐designers. FGDs were homogenous by gender and previous implant experience. During FGDs, we showed prototype devices and followed a semi‐structured guide with questions on history of contraceptive implant use, preferences for physical characteristics of an implant, implant biodegradability, insertion process, participant‐driven ideas for implant design, and social adoption considerations. FGDs were facilitated in English, isiXhosa, Tswana, isiZulu, or Tsonga, audio‐recorded, transcribed into English, and qualitatively coded and analysed.ResultsIn this qualitative sample of 105 youth (68 women and 37 men), 58 participants were from Soshanguve and 47 from Cape Town, and 23% had previously used contraceptive implants. Participants expressed preferences for several implant design features; specifically, longer duration (≥6 months) was more important to most participants than the size or number of devices implanted. A majority preferred a flexible versus stiff implant to minimize palpability, thereby increasing discreetness and comfort. Nearly all participants favoured a biodegradable implant to avoid removal and thus reduce clinic visits. Concerns about the implant centred on its possible side effects and the “plastic” look of the prototype displayed for demonstration.ConclusionsThis study offers preliminary insights into an implant for HIV prevention that provides long‐lasting protection may be well received among young South Africans. Additionally, flexibility, discreetness, and biodegradability may increase acceptability of the implant. Such end–user feedback is being incorporated into current implant designs in the hope of creating an effective long‐acting PrEP product that is likely to achieve high uptake and adherence in target populations.