The β-barrel assembly machine (Bam) complex in Gram-negative bacteria and its counterparts in mitochondria and chloroplasts fold and insert outer membrane β-barrel proteins. BamA, an essential component of the complex, is itself a β-barrel and is proposed to play a central role in assembling other barrel substrates. Here, we map the path of substrate insertion by the Bam complex using site-specific crosslinking to understand the molecular mechanisms that control β-barrel folding and release. We find that the C-terminal strand of the substrate is stably held by BamA and that the N-terminal strands of the substrate are assembled inside the BamA β-barrel. Importantly, we identify contacts between the assembling β-sheet and the BamA interior surface that determine the rate of substrate folding. Our results support a model in which the interior wall of BamA acts as a chaperone to catalyze β-barrel assembly.

The β-barrel assembly machine (Bam) complex folds and inserts integral membrane proteins into the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. The two essential components of the complex, BamA and BamD, both interact with substrates, but how the two coordinate with each other during assembly is not clear. To elucidate aspects of this process we slowed the assembly of an essential β-barrel substrate of the Bam complex, LptD, by changing a conserved residue near the C terminus. This defective substrate is recruited to the Bam complex via BamD but is unable to integrate into the membrane efficiently. Changes in the extracellular loops of BamA partially restore assembly kinetics, implying that BamA fails to engage this defective substrate. We conclude that substrate binding to BamD activates BamA by regulating extracellular loop interactions for folding and membrane integration.

Abstract. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are encoded by at least four distinct highly conserved genes, and alternative splicing generates multiple gene products. The close relationship among different FGFRs has greatly increased the difficulty in generating specific immunochemical probes. As an alternative strategy, we constructed a fusion protein comprising keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and an IgGt Fc domain (HFc). The chimeric molecule was efficiently secreted from transfectants as a disulfide-linked dimer that bound KGFRs with high affinity. Moreover, the KGF-HFc, like native KGF, induced DNA synthesis by epithelial cells implying normal functional receptor activation. Because it retained the convenient detection properties of an immunoglobulin, it was possible to use the KGF-HFc in ligand-mediated histochemical analysis of KGFRs. Flow cytometry revealed KGFoHFc chimera detection of the KGFR, an alternative FGFR2 product, but not FGFR1 (fig) or FGFR2 (bek). Histochemical analysis of normal skin demonstrated the specific localization of KGFRs within the spinous layer, a zone of epithelial cell differentiation. KGFRs were also localized to epithelial cells within a specific region of the hair follicle, and they were not detectable in cells of the sweat gland. Tissue sections of soft palate and tonsil, two examples of nonkeratinizing epithelium, revealed staining of stratum spinosum and some staining of the basal cell layer as well. Neither salivary gland epithelium nor lymphoid cells were positive. The ciliated epithelium of the trachea exhibited KGFR expression in intermediate and basal cell layers. In striking contrast to the normal pattern of staining in the adjacent epithelium, a squamous cell carcinoma of skin lacked detectable KGFP, s. Our present findings suggest that growth factor-Ig fusion proteins may be generally applicable in ligand-mediated histochemical detection and localization of growth factor receptors.

A green organic laboratory experiment was developed in which students synthesize a sensor for thiols using a microscale, solventless Diels–Alder reaction at room temperature or 37 °C. The molecular probe is easily purified by column chromatography in a Pasteur pipet and characterized by thin-layer chromatography and NMR spectroscopy. The thiol-reactive sensor becomes intensely fluorescent upon exposure to thiols from N-acetylcysteine, bovine serum albumin, or human hair (pretreated with a reducing agent to reveal cysteine thiols in α-keratin). This fluorescence is observable even with micrograms of probe.