Background: Supervised exercise therapy (SET) is a cornerstone of treatment for improving walking distance for individuals with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and claudication. High-quality randomized controlled trials have documented the efficacy of SET as a claudication treatment and led to the recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid decision to cover supervised exercise therapy (SET). However, to date, the translation of highly controlled, laboratory-based SET programs in real-world cardiopulmonary rehabilitation settings has not been explored. Methods: In this article, we described our experience integrating SET into existing cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programs, focusing on patient evaluation, exercise prescription, outcome assessments, strategies to maximize program adherence, and transitioning to home and community-based exercise training. Results: Our team has over 3 years' experience successfully implementing SET in cardiac rehabilitation settings. The experiences communicated here can serve as a model for clinical exercise physiologists as they begin to incorporate SET in their rehabilitation programs. Conclusion: CMS reimbursement has the potential to change clinical practice and utilization of SET for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. The experience we have gained through implementation of SET programs across the M Health and Fairview Health Systems and in other Minnesota communities—including specific elements in our programs and the lessons learned from our clinical experience—can inform and help guide development of new programs.
Despite patient report that pain hinders physical activity, clinicians who encounter patients with fibromyalgia, particularly patients with increased BMI, should be cognizant of the need to invest time and resources to counsel patients on physical factors (ie, physical activity) that could improve the patients' symptom experience.
Objective To evaluate the association between smoking and cognitive function in patients with fibromyalgia. Patients and Methods We surveyed 668 patients with fibromyalgia from May 1, 2012 through November 30, 2013 at a major tertiary referral center. Patients were categorized by smoking status. Primary outcome of interest was cognitive function (MASQ questionnaire), and secondary outcomes included fibromyalgia symptom severity (FIQ-R questionnaire), quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire), fatigue (MFI-20 questionnaire), sleep (MOS-sleep scale), anxiety (GAD-7 questionnaire), and depression (PHQ-9 questionnaire). Independent Students' t -tests and χ 2 tests were performed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate regression analysis identified variables predictive of outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, marital status, and educational level. Results Ninety-four (14.07%) patients self-identified as smokers. There was an association of lower education level, unmarried status, and younger age in smokers compared with nonsmokers. In the adjusted univariate regression analysis, fibromyalgia smokers reported greater perceived total cognitive dysfunction ( P =.009) and greater subscale scores of perceived difficulty in language ( P =.03), verbal memory ( P =.003), visual-spatial memory ( P =.02), and attention ( P =.04) compared with nonsmokers with fibromyalgia. For secondary outcomes, smokers with fibromyalgia reported greater severity of fibromyalgia-related symptoms ( P =.006), worse quality-of-life index in the mental component scale ( P =.02), greater sleep problems ( P =.01), and increased anxiety ( P =.001) compared with nonsmokers who had fibromyalgia. Conclusion In patients with fibromyalgia, smoking is a risk factor for cognitive dysfunction. Moreover, smokers with fibromyalgia were more likely to report increased severity of fibromyalgia symptoms, worse quality of life, more sleep problems, and increased anxiety compared with nonsmokers with fibromyalgia.
Objective To investigate sex-related differences in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) in terms of demographic characteristics and clinical features, including tender point count (TPC), mood disorders, sleep problems, FM symptom severity, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and quality of life (QOL). Patients and Methods We studied 668 consecutive patients with FM (606 women) from May 1, 2012, to November 30, 2013. Validated questionnaires assessed outcomes of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), sleep problems (Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale), FM symptom severity (Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), cognitive dysfunction (Multiple Ability Self-report Questionnaire), and QOL (36-Item Short Form Health Survey). Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Pearson χ 2 tests were used to compare continuous and categorical outcome measures, respectively, between men and women. Linear regression models were performed for all continuous dependent variables, adjusting for age, body mass index, ethnicity, marital status, and highest education level completed. P <.05 was considered statistically significant. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Results Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a significant association of female sex and greater TPC ( P <.001), lower overall FM symptom severity (lower overall Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire score; P =.03), and higher QOL subscale score for vitality (36-Item Short Form Health Survey vitality subscale score; P =.02). After adjustment for multiple comparisons, only the association between female sex and greater TPC remained significant. There were no sex-related differences in demographic characteristics, depression, anxiety, sleep problems, FM symptom severity, cognitive dysfunction, and QOL. Conclusion A higher TPC may be associated with female sex in patients with FM. The assumption of other sex-based differences in the clinical presentation of FM was not supported in our study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.