Songs among the Tlingit of Alaska and Canada are important means for communicating and aligning relationships, knowledges, and emotions among humans, non-human persons, and ancestral lands. As potent expressions of individual and collective identity, heritage, and destiny, songs encapsulate ethnobiological, social, and geographic knowledges in a melodious, interspecific lingua franca. A particular ancestral or communal context, such as a potlatch or ku.éex', may call for a spiritual, mournful, or happy song to help effect a transition, for example from mourning to celebration or death to rebirth. Ceremonial songs are typically owned as property and performed by particular Tlingit matrilineal groups, known as clans, or their house groups. However, songs are in the first instance composed by individuals, typically in response to other unique events, such as extraordinary encounters with wildlife, disasters, or other remarkable circumstances. The composers of such songs, both men and women, are respected and honored for their skills. Mary Sheakley (Lxook) is one such figure. She composed the song presented here in response to a group of wolves that came to the beach and howled as she and her fellow paddler left their subsistence camp in what is now Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve around the turn of the twentieth century. In 1996, the song was spontaneously remembered by a contemporary elder and younger clan sister to Mary Sheakley, Amy Marvin, who, in turn, taught it to her younger clan daughter during a berry picking trip to Glacier Bay. Later, during that same trip, Amy Marvin deployed the song to cap an impromptu ritual of commemoration for Tlingit relatives that died in a tragic boating accident in the Park in the late twentieth century. The song was thus not only revived but elevated in status to become a “clan song,” which is now considered sacred property (at.óow) and performed during ceremonies, such as the potlatch or ku.éex'.
This paper will look at the impacts of labeling across multiple areas of an organization and the supply chain. Furthermore, we will look at how new legislation, such as REACH and GHS, is changing labeling from an IT, regulatory, and strategic standpoint. Many jurisdictions have adopted a common framework for comprehensive chemical management regulation because of the potentially hazardous nature of some products. These mandates have been implemented to improve the margin of safety for human health and the environment. Increasingly global in scope, these regulations are replacing a global patchwork of inconsistent practices, ensuring clear communication of potential hazards and recommended handling procedures, regardless of geography and borders. REACH and GHS are regulations that have a direct impact on registration of chemicals, end-use notification, standard pictograms and hazard communication, and specific formatting guidelines. Because of its complexity, label production is too difficult for companies that try to manage the process manually. An automated solution is a must. Partnering with a labeling solutions provider can eliminate the pain associated with designing and maintaining homegrown labeling solutions, and drastically reduce the probability of non-compliance incidents, thereby leveraging your existing ERP, PLM and other technology assets, and automating your label production. In addition, this paper looks at the value and challenge of labeling across the organization. It provides ‘how-to’ guidance for ensuring compliance, and to achieve critical business growth objectives while reducing operational risks that can disrupt supply chains, customer relationships and business reputation. Jurisdictions worldwide are continuing the trend of adopting chemical regulations because of their stated goal to protect human health and the environment. We are seeing this trend embodied today in REACH1 (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical Substances) and the Globally Harmonized System of Classification2 (GHS),‘The Purple Wave.’ REACH has effectively restructured the registration of chemicals in Europe, and we are seeing a similar movement in other countries as well. Meanwhile, the European Union, Japan, Brazil, and New Zealand have formed the leading edge of jurisdictions that have implemented GHS, with several more countries looking to join the trend. Each change in legislation results in increased costs to the chemical industry, including direct costs of product registration or indirect costs related to providing the proper Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and labels for product distribution in a particular country. Labels are often printed in the language spoken at a facility, with no official translations of the regulation provided in other languages. This can lead to confusion in the interpretation of the meaning or intent of a regulation. Resolving the matter can be time-consuming, because of added back and forth communication that is required with government regulators, which takes the focus away from clarifying critical business questions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.