Celiac artery compression syndrome (CACS), also known as median arcuate ligament syndrome, celiac axis syndrome, and Dunbar Syndrome, is a rare disorder that results from compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament. The following is a case that depicts an interesting presentation of a patient diagnosed with this rare condition. A 44-year-old male with a history of mutism was brought in by his family for weight loss of 100 lbs with intermittent abdominal pain, weakness and lethargy over a period of five years. His family reported that he had poor nutritional intake, and could only eat a small amount before he seemed to be in pain, and eventually refused to eat. He had no other prior medical history except for mutism, no family history of malignancy, no history of trauma, surgeries, smoking or substance use, and did not take any medications. Physical exam was largely unremarkable. Mesenteric vascular duplex demonstrated severe grade stenosis of the celiac trunk with post-stenotic velocity of 520 cm/sec. Contrast enhanced computed tomography angiography revealed acute angle J-configuration of the takeoff of the celiac axis, with stenosis at its origin and focal post-stenotic dilatation, confirming the diagnosis of CACS.CACS is an elusive diagnosis that should be considered in patients where other causes of abdominal pain and weight loss have been ruled out. The disease can present with the classic triad of post-prandial abdominal pain, weight loss, and an abdominal bruit. Imaging modalities including mesenteric vascular duplex, computed tomography abdominal angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and celiac artery angiography can help make the diagnosis. Treatment involves surgical decompression via division of the median arcuate ligament, with most patients experiencing significant and long-lasting relief from their symptoms.
Introduction:
Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) who receive medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), either buprenorphine or methadone, have decreased all-cause and overdose mortality. Although in patients with congestive heart failure, OUD is associated with a greater number of heart failure hospitalizations (HFH), no studies were conducted on the outcomes of MOUD in this population.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesized that in patients with OUD and congestive heart failure, MOUD is associated with a decreased number of HFH.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed records of patients treated at the Rutgers NJMS Ambulatory Care Center, diagnosed with both heart failure and opioid use disorder between 2016 and 2018. We conducted multivariate linear regression to identify predictors of HFH.
Results:
Among 91 included patients, 60% were male, mean age was 58 ± 7 years old. The majority (75%) of patients were of African American ethnicity. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 41 ± 18%; 32% patients had preserved, 22% had mid-range and 46% had reduced LVEF. Over the 2-year period, 57% of patients were treated with buprenorphine, and 76% with methadone - a total of 87% of all patients were on MOUD. Less than half (37%) of the patients had medical insurance. Median number of HFH was 2.0 (IQR 0.0 - 8.5). In multivariate analysis (
table
), number of HFH correlated positively with the presence of insurance (β = 4.02 [95% CI 1.06 to 6.98], p = 0.008) and number of missed appointments (β = 0.33 [95% CI 0.11 to 0.55], p = 0.003), and negatively with MOUD (β = –5.41 [95% CI -9.52 to -1.31], p = 0.01). HFH were not associated with LVEF (p = 0.746), diastolic dysfunction (p = 0.855) or age and gender.
Conclusions:
In patients with OUD and congestive heart failure, MOUD is independently associated with less HFH and is one of its strongest predictors. Expanding access to methadone and buprenorphine appears to be critical in improving the quality of care of this vulnerable and underserved population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.