While web‐based indicators for scientific impact – so‐called altmetrics – have an increasing uptake as means for research evaluation, many questions regarding their actual meanings remain unanswered. In this article we analyse the data from a survey about researchers' use of 107 online actions that underlie potential altmetrics to discover whether certain types of altmetrics (1) better reflect the judgments of researchers from certain career stages and (2) more reliably capture positive judgments than others. We apply variance analyses to reveal significant differences between the frequencies with which early‐stage researchers and professors perform various actions whose occurrences are counted as impact metrics (e.g., downloading, liking, or sharing of scientific publications). The findings imply varying degrees of representation of these groups in respective altmetrics. Moreover, by investigating how commonly various types of actions are used to express positive judgments, we disclose how reliably metrics can be used as proxies for positive impact. Our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the meaning of different web‐based metrics for scholarly impact and provide a basis for evidence‐based guidelines on how to use and interpret them.
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Dieses Dokument darf zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern für das Dokument eine Open-Content-Lizenz verwendet wurde, so gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: This document may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the document in public. If the document is made available under a Creative Commons Licence you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the licence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.