This article aims to review ethical and clinical guidelines and policies addressing the communication of genetic information in families. Websites of national and regional bioethics committees, national human genetics societies, international health organisations, genetic interest groups and legal recommendations committees were searched for guidelines and policies. The databases Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar were also utilised to search for additional guidelines relating to the communication of genetic information in families. The guidelines and policies included in this review are limited to those available in English. The search resulted in guidelines from 18 international, regional and national organisations from six countries pertaining to family communication of genetic information. The following ideals were common in their guidelines: (1) individuals have a moral obligation to communicate genetic information to their family members; (2) genetic health professionals should encourage individuals to communicate this information to their family members; and (3) genetic health professionals should support individuals throughout the communication process. The difference between the organisations' guidelines was the inclusion of information about the role of the health professional in supporting clients during the process of communicating genetic information to their family members. Only two recommendations suggested that the health professional should support their clients by identifying at-risk family members, but more guidelines recommended that directive counselling should be undertaken to encourage clients to communicate genetic information to their family members. In conclusion, the guidelines provide an overview of the role that genetic health professionals may undertake; however, there are gaps that need to be addressed.

No abstract

Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis has been recommended for pregnant women and their partners, individuals and couples prior to conception, and for people with a family history. Many pilot programmes offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening, most commonly in the prenatal setting, have shown that uptake and acceptability are high. This article explores perspectives of the Victorian community regarding carrier screening for cystic fibrosis prior to offering screening. In particular whether or not such carrier screening should be offered, the best time for offering carrier screening, the information required for making a decision about carrier screening, and how this information can best be provided. A qualitative approach was taken to enable exploration of the views of stakeholders. Four focus groups and 32 interviews were conducted with a total of 68 participants. Participants were in agreement that cystic fibrosis carrier screening should be made available to everyone. However, potential consumers viewed cystic fibrosis carrier screening as 'not in my world' and were unlikely to request such screening unless it was offered by a health professional, or they had a family history. The best time for carrier screening was seen to be an individual preference and an information brochure was perceived to be useful when considering carrier screening. Lack of knowledge around the irrelevance of family history is a barrier to cystic fibrosis carrier screening. This study highlights the importance of community consultation, with stakeholders, prior to implementation of carrier screening programmes.