Young (0.5 years) and aged (2+, 3+, and 4+ years) rabbits underwent acquisition of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in a delay (500-ms conditioned stimulus [CS], 400-ms interstimulus interval [ISI]), long-delay (1,000-ms CS, 900-ms ISI), or trace (500-ms CS, 400-ms stimulus-free period) paradigm. Collapsing across age groups, there is a general tendency for animals to acquire trace conditioning more slowly than delay conditioning. Collapsing across conditioning paradigms, there is a general tendency for aged animals to acquire more slowly than younger animals. Of greater significance, however, are the age differences in the different conditioning paradigms. In the delay and long-delay paradigms, significant conditioning deficits first appeared in the 4(+)-year-old group. In the trace conditioning paradigm, significant conditioning deficits became apparent in the 2(+)-year-old animals.

Human (Homo sapiens) volunteers (N = 72) received saline, a low dose of oral scopolamine (0.6 mg), a high dose of oral scopolamine (1.2 mg), or a peripheral analogue (glycopyrrolate). They then underwent classical conditioning of the eyeblink response to a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and a corneal airpuff unconditioned stimulus (UCS) in a delay conditioning paradigm. There was a dose-related decline in acquisition of the conditioned response. These drug-induced conditioning deficits were similar to those previously reported in rabbit eyeblink conditioning and could not be attributed to such nonassociative factors as changes in auditory thresholds to the tone CS, magnitude of reflexive blinks to the airpuff UCS, or to changes in spontaneous blink rates.

Young (17-22 years) and older (61-86 years) persons underwent classical conditioning of the eye-blink response to a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and an airpuff unconditioned stimulus (UCS) at 1 of 3 interstimulus intervals (ISIs; 400, 650, and 900 ms). As in a previous study, older subjects conditioned more slowly and emitted fewer conditioned responses at the optimal 400-ms ISI. At longer ISIs, however, this age-related disruption of classical conditioning was attenuated. These differences in conditioning were not due to nonassociative factors, such as sensitivity to the tone CS or airpuff UCS or to differences in spontaneous blink rate, nor were they due to differences in general cognitive abilities. The results are discussed in terms of the role of temporal relationships between stimuli in conditioning across the life span.

Young and aged rabbits underwent classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response (NMR) to a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and a corneal airpuff unconditioned stimulus (UCS) for 18 consecutive days. Rabbits were then returned to their home cages for a 90-day period in which they received no further conditioning, but they were handled daily. On Day 91 they underwent retention testing during which the CS alone was presented 20 times. This was immediately followed by reacquisition in which the CS and UCS were again paired for 100 trials. Reacquisition was repeated on the following day. As in previous studies, aged rabbits acquired the conditioned response (CR) more slowly than young rabbits; however, by the end of acquisition, both groups reached similar asymptotic levels. Retention of the CR was significantly lower for aged than young rabbits. Reacquisition was also retarded in aged vs. young rabbits. Nonassociative factors, such as sensitivity to the stimuli or general health, could not account for these differences. Data are discussed in terms of using retention of the conditioned eyeblink response as a model system for studying age-related memory deficits.

No abstract