Background: Endotracheal intubation is a common procedure in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Rapid and accurate confirmation of the endotracheal tube (ETT) position is critical . Routinely CXR is used for evaluation of ETT position that has some disadvantages . So there has been a considerable interest to find alternative modality with minimal complication and acceptable accuracy. Objectives: the purpose of our study is the evaluation of ultrasound efficacy in confirmation of ETT position in neonates comparison to CXR.Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 66 intubated neonates in NICU of Ali -Asghar children Hospital, between January 2018 and January 2019. To determine the ETT position, within 2-4 hours after CXR, each neonate had a bedside ultrasound (US) with a high-frequency linear transducer. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predicted value (NPV), positive predicted value (PPV) and Kappa agreement coefficient was used to compare the US and CXR results. Results: Sixty-six intubated neonates included in this study had a mean gestational age of 34.98 ±3.7 weeks and mean birth weight of 2284.7 ± 915g. US images were taken a mean of 3 ±0.6 h after CXR. The ETT was visualized by the US in all newborns examined.US revealed a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 68.78% to 97.45%), specificity of 84 % (95% CI, 63.92% 95.46%), PPV of 84.62% (95% CI, 68.89% to 93.18%), NPV of 87.50 % (95% CI, 70.49% to 95.35%), diagnostic accuracy of 86%(95% CI, 73.26% to 94.18%), positive likelihood ratio of 5.50 (95% CI 2.21 to 13.66), and Negative Likelihood Ratio of 0.14 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.46) compared to chest radiography. Overall, the Kappa value showed very good agreement in confirming the correct position of the tracheal tube placement (Kappa coefficient 0.72, p-value <0.001).The mean time taken for confirmation of ETT position by US 4 minutes and by CXR was 20 minutes.Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate ultrasound has acceptable accuracy for confirmation of ETT position in neonates and is a safer and faster method in comparison to CXR .

Background: What has received special attention in recent months is the use of a combination of clinical findings, laboratory markers, and, in addition, the findings of lung Computed Tomography (CT) scan in the design and delivery of risk scoring systems for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID -19) patients. The present study aimed to determine main lung CT-related correlates of disease severity (Intensive Care Units (ICU) requiring) as well as death in COVID -19 patients.Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 515 consecutive patients with definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to one of the COVID -19 referral hospitals in Tehran. All patients' information was collected through a review of their archives. All patients were evaluated by CT scan of the lungs.Results: The mean follow-up of patients from the time of admission was 10.85±6.11 days between 1 and 30 days. During this period, a total of 29.1% were admitted to the ICU. Also, the mortality rate of patients was equal to 28.2%. According to multivariable logistic regression model with the presence of death-related correlates, crazy paving pattern, diffuse distribution of lesions, CT Severity Score (CTSS) score >12, the presence of plural effusion or emphysema were the main determinants of COVID -19 related death and should be considered for presenting new scoring system for predicting death following COVID -19 disease. In similar model, CTSS score >12 along with the presence of plural effusion, emphysema, or pulmonary hypertension were the main determinants of requiring ICU admission. Conclusion: The CT score higher than 12 along with observing the pattern of diffuse distribution of lesions especially accompanied with emphysema, pleural effusion or pulmonary hypertension can predict patient mortality or will determine the need for hospitalization in the ICU.

Background: Endotracheal intubation is a common procedure in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Rapid and accurate confirmation of the endotracheal tube (ETT) position is critical . Routinely CXR is used for evaluation of ETT position that has some disadvantages . So there has been a considerable interest to find alternative modality with minimal complication and acceptable accuracy. The purpose of our study is the evaluation of ultrasound efficacy in confirmation of ETT position in neonates comparison to CXR.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 66 intubated neonates in NICU of Ali -Asghar children Hospital, between January 2018 and January 2019. To determine the ETT position, CXR and ultrasound were requested at the same time. Each neonate had a bedside ultrasound (US) with a high-frequency linear transducer. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predicted value (NPV), positive predicted value (PPV) and Kappa agreement coefficient was used to compare the US and CXR results. Results: Sixty-six intubated neonates included in this study had a mean gestational age of 34.98 ±3.7 weeks and mean birth weight of 2284.7 ± 915g. US images were taken a mean of 3 ±0.6 h after CXR. The ETT was visualized by the US in all newborns examined.US revealed a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 68.78% to 97.45%), specificity of 84 % (95% CI, 63.92% 95.46%), PPV of 84.62% (95% CI, 68.89% to 93.18%), NPV of 87.50 % (95% CI, 70.49% to 95.35%), diagnostic accuracy of 86%(95% CI, 73.26% to 94.18%), positive likelihood ratio of 5.50 (95% CI 2.21 to 13.66), and Negative Likelihood Ratio of 0.14 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.46) compared to chest radiography. Overall, the Kappa value showed very good agreement in confirming the correct position of the tracheal tube placement (Kappa coefficient 0.72, p-value <0.001).The mean time taken for confirmation of ETT position by US 4 minutes and by CXR was 20 minutes.Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate ultrasound has acceptable accuracy for confirmation of ETT position in neonates and is a safer and faster method in comparison to CXR .

Background: Endotracheal intubation is a common procedure in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Rapid and accurate confirmation of the endotracheal tube (ETT) position is critical . Routinely CXR is used for evaluation of ETT position that has some disadvantages . So there has been a considerable interest to find alternative modality with minimal complication and acceptable accuracy. The purpose of our study is the evaluation of ultrasound efficacy in confirmation of ETT position in neonates comparison to CXR.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 66 intubated neonates in NICU of Ali -Asghar children Hospital, between January 2018 and January 2019. To determine the ETT position, CXR and ultrasound were requested at the same time and only patients who could have an ultrasound immediately after intubation and without repositioning of tracheal tube between CXR and ultrasound were included in the study .Each neonate had a bedside ultrasound (US) with a high-frequency linear transducer. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predicted value (NPV), positive predicted value (PPV) and Kappa agreement coefficient was used to compare the US and CXR results.Results: Sixty-six intubated neonates included in this study had a mean gestational age of 34.98 ±3.7 weeks and mean birth weight of 2284.7 ± 915g. US images were taken a mean of 3 ±0.6 h after CXR. The ETT was visualized by the US in all newborns examined.US revealed a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 68.78% to 97.45%), specificity of 84 % (95% CI, 63.92% 95.46%), PPV of 84.62% (95% CI, 68.89% to 93.18%), NPV of 87.50 % (95% CI, 70.49% to 95.35%), diagnostic accuracy of 86%(95% CI, 73.26% to 94.18%), positive likelihood ratio of 5.50 (95% CI 2.21 to 13.66), and Negative Likelihood Ratio of 0.14 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.46) compared to chest radiography. Overall, the Kappa value showed very good agreement in confirming the correct position of the tracheal tube placement (Kappa coefficient 0.72, p-value <0.001).The mean time taken for confirmation of ETT position by US 4 minutes and by CXR was 20 minutes.Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate ultrasound has acceptable accuracy for confirmation of ETT position in neonates and is a safer and faster method in comparison to CXR .