Surabaya, ada banyak Rusunawa (apartemen sewa untuk masyarakat berpenghasilan rendah hingga menengah). Air bersih untuk penggunaan kebutuhan seharihari di Rusunawa diperoleh dari PDAM Surabaya. Biaya untuk konsumsi air yang dibayarkan oleh penyewa dianggap terlalu mahal karena penyewa sebagian besar memiliki pendapatan rendah atau menengah. Oleh karena itu, sumber lain untuk air bersih yang murah dan mudah perlu dipertimbangkan. Pemanenan air hujan (PAH) adalah salah satu alternatif yang dapat dipertimbangkan karena Surabaya merupakan daerah dengan curah hujan yang cukup tinggi. Tugas akhir ini akan membahas potensi air hujan sebagai sumber air bersih alternatif di Rusunawa. Air hujan dikumpulkan dari atap rusunawa tersebut. Kualitas air hujan dianalisis di laboratorium. Jumlah air hujan dihitung berdasarkan curah hujan rata-rata berdasarkan data selama sepuluh tahun. Air hujan yang dikumpulkan mengalir ke reservoir tanah yang ada serta yang baru sebelum didistribusikan kepada penyewa. Air hujan yang dikumpulkan secara umum memenuhi standar kualitas yang tercantum dalam Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 42 Tahun 2010. Namun, kualitas air hujan agak sedikit asam; oleh karena itu, perlu dicampur dengan air PDAM. Air hujan dari atap setiap blok Rusunawa dikumpulkan di reservoir yang ada. Berdasarkan jumlah air hujan yang ditampung, total biaya untuk perencanaan ini sekitar Rp 558.930.070. Adapun prosentase penghematan terhadap pemakaian air PDAM selama 1 bulan untuk masing-masing blok A = 17,18% ; blok B

The economic rise as much as 5.5% in East Java region in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the first quarter of 2017, was due to the main supporting factor of an increase in the number of industries. An increase in industry has the potential to cause environmental pollution, especially in water bodies as evidenced by an index of water quality conditions for East Java rivers that now stands on Class II. Currently, PT. X in East Java is working on the expansion of its company. This study aims to identify the risks of wastewater treatment of PT. X using the fishbone analysis method and determine the priority of failures that must be handled using the FMEA method.For research purposes, two types of data are used, namely secondary and primary data. Secondary data includes flow chart of wastewater treatment, wastewater quality report and standard operating procedures. Meanwhile, the primary data for the quality of wastewater treatment was obtained through sampling, which was carried out at each wastewater treatment unit as well as the results of questionnaire with direct interviews. From those two types of data, an analysis of the potential occurrence of risk arises by using a fishbone analysis diagram. The risk results obtained through fishbone analysis are then processed using the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method to obtain a Risk Priority Number (RPN). Then, the results of risk analysis from fishbone analysis are assessed into a priority of failures, expressed in Risk Priority Number (RPN).Based on the analysis of research data, it was concluded that the problem that occurred in wastewater treatment was inefficient wastewater treatment. The inefficient process was caused by the WWTP design conditions that were greater than the inlet discharge. Based on the results of data processing using the FMEA method, it was found that the largest RPN value was 125.

Water Treatment Plant (WTP) "X" consists of intake, aerator, pre-sedimentation, coagulation, clearator, filter and reservoir. In the production of drinking water, several problems are encountered that threaten the process. These constraints affect the production target in regard to quality. Minister of Health Regulation No. 492 of 2010 about Requirements for Quality of Drinking Water stated every drinking water provider is obliged to guarantee the drinking water it produces is safe for human health, meeting the quality standards of physical, chemical and biological parameters. This study used Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point method. Hazard Analysis is an analytical method to identify the presence of hazards and risks in the supply production chain so the control management can be established. The existence of hazards in production process will cause losses in terms of economics and also customer trust. This method reviewed based on laboratory results of water quality and the existing conditions of operational in production process. The analysis and evaluation of its existing conditions using HACCP method generates information that the biggest source of risk that affects the quality of production is found in the operations of each processing unit and fluctuations of its debit. The corrective actions that can be taken to prevent the occurrence of failures in the production system are improving the performance of the water treatment units, discharge settings according to unit capacity, there must be modification of the flocculation and aeration process, also improvement of workers' insights regarding water quality in accordance with SNI 01-4852-1998.

IPAM Karangpilang's water quality has fluctuated and there are several parameters whose quality is not in accordance with the quality standard. Therefore, IPAM Karangpilang II needs to carry out quality control to maintain the quality of drinking water products according to the applicable quality standards. This research aims to analyze the application of the quality control system for drinking water products at IPAM Karangpilang II and look for the causes of decreasing production water quality at IPAM Karangpilang II. So that alternative improvements can be determined to maintain drinking water quality at IPAM Karangpilang II. Quality control method in this study using Statistical Process Control (SPC). Analysis were using primary data on drinking water quality starting from March to April 2019. Measurement parameters used include pH, Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), Turbidity, and Organic matter. Determination of a process controlled using control chart and then implemented using a fishbone diagram to determine the factors that result in decreased production of water quality. Control charts are in a statistically uncontrolled condition on the pH parameters in the clearator and filter units, Total Dissolved Solid (TDS) parameters on the clearator unit, turbidity parameters in the pre-sedimentation unit, clearator and filter, and organic matter parameters in pre-sedimentation and filter units. While in the production of water control chart in a state of uncontrolled statistically in the turbidity. Based on the fishbone diagram, factors that cause the control chart to be in an uncontrolled condition are that the overflow rate clearator does not appropriate with design criteria, technical errors such as clogging of the tube settler on the clearator, congestion coagulant pump stagnation, tube settler replacement in the clearator, seldom using coagulant dosage, decrease in the quality of raw water in the parameters of organic matter and raw water conditions that fluctuate due to the rainy season.

The MIPA Tower office building, an eleven-storey building, which is located in the area of Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya, is under construction. The building will be utilized for offices, classrooms, and laboratories. In the operation of the building, domestic and laboratory wastewater will be produced. This wastewater contains compounds that can pollute the environment. A design of domestic and laboratory wastewater treatment system is conducted. The system comprises of a neutralization tank, a grease trap, an equalization tank, an anaerobic filter, and an activated carbon and silica sand filter. The steps of the design are (i) collecting primary data and secondary data, (ii) calculating the engineering design, (iii) drawing the Detailed Engineering Design (DED), and (iv) calculating the bill of quantity and budget. The conclusion of this design is that the treatment plant will treat a mixture of domestic and laboratory wastewater. The dimension of each unit is as follows: (i) the neutralization tank (Ø = 0.65 m, H = 0.43 m), (ii) the grease trap (4 m x 2 m x 1 m), (iii) the equalization tank (10.5 m x 5.5 m x 2.5 m), (iv) the septic tank (4.5 m x 4 m x 2.5 m), (v) the six-compartment anaerobic filter (2.25 m x 4 m x 2.5 m), and (vi) the filter with activated carbon (H = 50 cm), silica sand (H = 150 cm), and gravel (H = 10 cm), with the diameter of the tank is 1.5 m.