No abstract

Background: This study explored (1) if long-distance transfer was safe for patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) and (2) analyzed the effectiveness of helicopter transfer and cloud-type imaging transfer systems for such patients in northern Hokkaido, Japan. Method and Results: The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgical treatment for AADA from April 2014 to September 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to the location of referral source hospitals: the Asahikawa-city group (group A, n = 49) and the out-of-the-city group (group O, n = 63). Use of helicopter transfer (n = 13) and cloud-type telemedicine (n = 20) in group O were reviewed as sub-analyses. Transfer distance differed between groups (4.2±3.5 km in group A vs 107.3±69.2 km in group O; p = 0.0001), but 30-day mortality (10.2% in group A vs. 7.9% in group O; p = 0.676) and hospital mortality (12.2% in group A vs. 9.5% in group O; p = 0.687) did not differ. Operative outcomes did not differ with or without helicopter and cloud-type telemedicine, but diagnosis-to-operation time was shorter with helicopter (240.0±70.8 vs 320.0±78.5 min; p = 0.031) and telemedicine (242.0±75.2 vs 319.0±83.8 min; p = 0.007). Conclusions: We found that long-distance transfer did not impair surgical outcomes in AADA patients, and both helicopter transfer and cloud-type telemedicine system could contribute to the reduction of diagnosis-to-operation time in the large Hokkaido area. Further studies are mandatory to investigate if the both systems will improve clinical outcomes.

Triplex (Terumo Corp, Tokyo, Japan) is a relatively new vascular protheses with a non-biodegradable coating material. We experienced two cases of graft elongation in Triplex grafts post-operatively. In one of the cases, the graft elongation led to occlusion of the left subclavian artery. In the other case, the graft elongation resulted in a pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta. A unique feature of Triplex grafts is that they may reduce post-operative inflammation reaction; however, they could also invite a limited adhesion formation with the surrounding tissue, which contribute to prostheses elongation, due to a lack of prostheses stability and fixation. A careful observation based on the feature of implanted protheses is required.

ObjectiveSecure proximal anastomosis is an essential part of surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA). This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the modified turn-up technique for proximal anastomosis in AADA and compare this technique with other techniques.MethodsWe divided 57 patients who underwent ascending aorta replacement for AADA into the modified turn-up technique group (group A: 36 patients) and the other technique group (group B: 21 patients). Intraoperative and postoperative course data were compared between groups A and B. In group A, we also compared early-career surgeons (practicing for <10 years after graduation) and aged surgeons (practicing for ≥10 years after graduation).ResultsPreoperative patient characteristics did not differ between groups. There was a tendency toward shorter operation time in group A than in group B without statistical significance (p = 0.12), and the length of intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter (p < 0.01); the occurrence of cerebral infarction was lower (p < 0.01) in group A than in group B, whereas mortality and major complications other than the cerebral infarction rate did not differ between the groups. In group A, 13 patients were operated on by early-career surgeons, while 23 patients were operated on by surgeons with more than 10 years of experience. Aortic clamp time and circulatory arrest time were significantly longer in patients operated on by early-career surgeons, but outcomes were comparable.ConclusionsThe modified turn-up technique was comparable to other techniques. Even for less skilled surgeons (e.g., early-career surgeons), the use of this technique may lead to stable outcomes.