Our findings suggest that vision can influence pathologic pain, and preliminarily suggest that prism adaptation has a direction-specific and reproducible effect on not only pathologic pain but also other CRPS pathologic features. Thus, prism adaptation may be a viable cognitive treatment for CRPS.

β-Cyclodextrin (β-CyD) was cross-linked by toluene 2,4-diisocyanate in the presence of various steroids in dimethyl sulfoxide, and the steroids were removed after the polymerization. The molecularly imprinted β-CyD polymer, obtained by using cholesterol or stigmasterol as the template, efficiently and reversibly bound the steroid in the mixtures of water and tetrahydrofuran. In these polymers, the mutual orientation of β-CyD molecules is regulated so that they cooperatively bind the target guests which are too large to be included in the cavity of one β-CyD molecule. When either the alkyl residue at the 17-position or the hydroxyl residue at the 3-position is absent from the template, however, the molecular imprinting is much less efficient. The mechanism for the imprinting and the structure of the guest-binding sites in the imprinted polymers have been proposed.

Recent studies have identified myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) that are potent suppressors of tumor immunity and therefore a significant impediment to cancer immunotherapy. It has been reported that MDSCs are generated by malignant diseases or inflammation. However, no systematic studies in patients have been described. In order to clinically characterize MDSCs, we tested PBMCs from patients with various types of cancer including cholangiocellular, hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinoma, esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer, breast cancer and thyroid cancer, and GIST, and those from normal volunteers using flow cytometry analysis. A significant increase was seen in the percentages of MDSCs in PBMCs from patients compared with normal volunteers. Among these patients, MDSC level was higher in patients with cancer of the digestive system and patients with breast cancer compared with normal volunteers. MDSC level was significantly and inversely correlated to stimulation indices (SI) of PHA-blastogenesis of lymphocytes and serum concentration of total protein, and positively correlated to neutrophil count. MDSC percentage in patients with gastric and colorectal cancer was also significantly correlated to neutrophil count and inversely correlated with lymphocyte count, and showed highly significant correlation to neutrophil/lymphocyte rate (NLR). In patients with breast cancer, MDSC levels in preoperative patients was significantly increased compared to normal volunteers and significantly decreased in postoperative patients. Thus, it is clear that MDSCs are increased in patients with cancer and closely related to suppression of cell-mediated immune responses. These data also suggest that they are related to chronic inflammation and that their levels are increased further in the terminal stages of patients whose nutritional status is impaired as observed in hypoproteinemia. MDSC levels have also been shown to decrease after removal of tumors in patients with breast cancer.

In this pilot study, we roughly classified the pain descriptor items into two types for evaluating the qualities of deafferentation pain. We found that visually induced motor imagery by MVF was more effective for reducing deep pain than superficial pain. This suggests that the analgesic effect of MVF treatment does depend on the qualities of the pain. Further research will be required to confirm that this effect is a specific consequence of MVF.

The authors tested a modified motor cortex stimulation protocol for treatment of central and peripheral types of deafferentation pain. Four patients with thalamic pain and four with peripheral deafferentation pain were studied. Preoperative pharmacological tests of pain relief were performed using phentolamine, lidocaine, ketamine, thiopental, and placebo. In five patients we placed a 20- or 40-electrode grid in the subdural space to determine the best stimulation point for pain relief for a few weeks before definitive placement of a four-electrode array. In three patients, the four-electrode array was implanted in the interhemispheric fissure as a one-stage procedure to treat lower-extremity pain. In two patients with pain extending from the extremity to the trunk or hip, dual devices were implanted to drive two electrodes. Six of eight patients experienced pain reduction (two each with excellent, good, and fair relief) from motor cortex stimulation. No correlation was apparent between pharmacological test results and the effectiveness of motor cortex stimulation. Patients with peripheral deafferentation pain, including two with phantom-limb pain and two with brachial plexus injury, attained pain relief from motor cortex stimulation, with excellent results in two cases. Testing performed with a subdural multiple-electrode grid was helpful in locating the best stimulation point for pain relief. Motor cortex stimulation may be effective for treating peripheral as well as central deafferentation pain.