HtrA1, a member of the mammalian HtrA serine protease family, has a highly conserved protease domain followed by a PDZ domain. Because HtrA1 is a secretory protein and has another functional domain with homology to follistatin, we examined whether HtrA1 functions as an antagonist of Tgfβfamily proteins. During embryo development, mouse HtrA1 was expressed in specific areas where signaling by Tgfβ family proteins plays important regulatory roles. The GST-pulldown assay showed that HtrA1 binds to a broad range of Tgfβ family proteins, including Bmp4, Gdf5, Tgfβs and activin. HtrA1 inhibited signaling by Bmp4, Bmp2, and Tgfβ1 in C2C12 cells, presumably by preventing receptor activation. Experiments using a series of deletion mutants indicated that the binding activity of HtrA1 required the protease domain and a small linker region preceding it, and that inhibition of Tgfβ signaling is dependent on the proteolytic activity of HtrA1. Misexpression of HtrA1 near the developing chick eye led to suppression of eye development that was indistinguishable from the effects of noggin. Taken together, these data indicate that HtrA1 protease is a novel inhibitor of Tgfβ family members.

DNA binding specificity of the RBP-J kappa protein was extensively examined. The mouse RBP-J kappa protein was originally isolated as a nuclear protein binding to the J kappa type V(D)J recombination signal sequence which consisted of the conserved heptamer (CACTGTG) and nonamer (GGTTTTTGT) sequences separated by a 23-base pair spacer. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay using DNA probes with mutations in various parts of the J kappa recombination signal sequence showed that the RBP-J kappa protein recognized the sequence outside the recombination signal in addition to the heptamer but did not recognize the nonamer sequence and the spacer length at all. Database search identified the best naturally occurring binding motif (CACTGTGGGAACGG) for the RBP-J kappa protein in the promoter region of the m8 gene in the Enhancer of split gene cluster of Drosophila. The binding assay with a series of m8 motif mutants indicated that the protein recognized mostly the GTGGGAA sequence and also interacted weakly with ACT and CG sequences flanking this hepta-nucleotide. Oligonucleotides binding to the RBP-J kappa protein were enriched from a pool of synthetic oligonucleotides containing 20-base random sequences by the repeated electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The enriched oligomer shared a common sequence of CGTGGGAA. All these data indicate that the RBP-J kappa protein recognizes a unique core sequence of CGTGGGAA and does not bind to the V(D)J recombination signal without the flanking sequence.

Intercellular signaling through the cell-surface receptor Notch plays important roles in a variety of developmental processes as well as in pathogenesis of some human cancers and genetic disorders. However, the mechanisms by which Notch signals are transduced into cells still remain elusive. Here we investigated the signaling mechanisms for Notch in the cell fate control of neural progenitor cells. We show that Deltex-1 (DTX1), a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Deltex, mediates a Notch signal to block differentiation of neural progenitor cells. We found that a significant fraction of DTX1 proteins were localized in the nucleus and physically interacted with the transcriptional coactivator p300. Through its binding to p300, DTX1 inhibited transcriptional activation by the neural-specific helix-loop-helixtype transcription factor MASH1, and this mechanism is likely responsible for the differentiation inhibition of neural progenitor cells. Our results further suggest that DTX1 regulates transcription independently of the previously characterized Notch signaling pathway involving RBP-J and HES1/HES5. Thus, DTX1 serves as an important signaling component downstream of Notch that regulates transcription in the nucleus.

No abstract

The expression of mouse HtrA1 is developmentally regulated and restricted in embryo tissues which depend largely on TGF‐β signaling for their differentiation. We examined whether mouse HtrA3, another HtrA family member very close to HtrA1, shows similar expression patterns. HtrA3 and ‐1 were expressed mostly in the same embryonic organs but exhibited complementary patterns in various tissues; the lens epithelial cells in day 12.5 embryo expressed HtrA3 whereas the ciliary body and pigment retina expressed HtrA1. In the vertebrae of day 14.5 embryo, HtrA3 was expressed in the tail region, but HtrA1 was predominantly expressed in the thoracic and lumbar regions. Similar to HtrA1, HtrA3 bound to various TGF‐β proteins and inhibited the signaling of BMP‐4, ‐2 and TGF‐β1. HtrA3 did not inhibit signaling originated from a constitutively active BMP receptor, indicating that the inhibition occurred upstream of the cell surface receptor. HtrA3 also showed proteolytic activities indistinguishable from those of HtrA1 toward β‐casein and some extracellular matrix (ECM) proteoglycans. The protease activity was absolutely required for the TGF‐β signal inhibition activity. All these data suggest that HtrA3 and ‐1 have the overlapping biological activities but can function in complementary fashion in certain types of tissues.