BackgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with NVAF who were newly treated with DOACs in a real-world clinical setting.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with NVAF newly treated with one of three DOACs—dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban—between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015.ResultsA total of 670 patients with NVAF who were newly prescribed one of the three DOACs were analyzed; 74 patients (10.9%) received dabigatran, 290 (43.3%) received rivaroxaban, and 306 (45.8%) received apixaban. Fifteen patients had thromboembolic events, almost half of which were due to discontinuation of DOACs. Six patients had major bleeding, although almost all were discharged with good neurological prognoses. A total of 129 patients were treated with a suboptimal low-dose DOAC; none experienced a thromboembolic event as long as the DOAC was taken regularly, and none of the patients in any of the three DOAC groups had major bleeding events.ConclusionsWith good adherence, the clinical course associated with DOACs is comparatively good. In the future, suboptimal low-dose DOAC therapy may serve as an appropriate choice for some patients with a high risk of stroke and bleeding.

No abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) in small vessels < 3.0 mm in diameter. Included were 166 patients (175 lesions) treated with CBA (CBA group), and 215 patients (240 lesions) were treated with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA group). No differences were observed in patient backgrounds or lesion characteristics between the two groups. Procedural success rates were similar: 98.3% (CBA) versus 95.8% (POBA). Coronary dissection rates were also similar: 7.4% in the CBA versus 5.8% in the POBA group. Severe dissections (types E and F) occurred in 2.5% of cases in the POBA group, whereas there was none observed in the CBA group. In-hospital complications occurred in 3.3% in the POBA group, and in only 0.6% in the CBA group. The restenosis rate was 37.5% (CBA group) versus 48.1% (POBA group); and in vessels < 2.75 mm, restenosis was significantly lower in the CBA group than in the POBA group (36.9% vs 62.7%, P < 0.05). CBA may be a useful therapeutic strategy for small vessels, given the absence of severe coronary dissection and the significantly lower rate of restenosis compared to POBA.

Background  Hypersensitivity reaction is a classic cause of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in coronary stents, typically reported in bare-metal stents and first-generation drug-eluting stents. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) was developed with the concept of biocompatibility, and there has been no report of ISR of BP-SES with hypersensitivity reaction. Case summary  An 81-year-old woman presented with ST-elevation acute inferior myocardial infarction. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention was performed for the culprit lesion in the left circumflex artery with a permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent (PP-EES), followed by BP-SES implantation in the left anterior descending artery. Eight months later, coronary angiography showed total occlusion of the PP-EES and diffuse ISR in the BP-SES, treated with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon. Fluorodeoxyglucose with positron emission tomography showed increased uptake around the BP-SES, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed a late gadolinium-enhanced area around both stents. Four months later, she developed re-ISR in the BP-SES, and optical coherence tomography demonstrated diffuse-layered neointimal hyperplasia with microvascularization and peri-strut low-intensity area. She was successfully treated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Discussion  Our case demonstrated repetitive short-term ISR of the BP-SES. Observation by both intravascular and non-invasive imaging modalities suggested the presence of hypersensitivity reaction localized in the stent. Hypersensitivity to the metal may be a possible mechanism because both stents are composed of L605 cobalt–chromium alloy. This is the first report of ISR of a BP-SES with hypersensitivity reaction. Non-invasive imaging can be useful to assess this critical condition.

DES era, SER is a common restenosis pattern. In terms of vessel factors around a stent edge, residual plaque burden and lipid arc have been reported to be predictors for SER, either with bare-metal stents or DESs. 7,8 The vascular response to the mechanical stress imposed on a stent edge was assumed to differ according to local vascular properties.The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between hinge motion at the stent edge and the incidence of SER in the right coronary artery (RCA) where vessel movement is commonly excessive. In addition, we performed intravascular imaging analysis to demonstrate the differential effects of hinge motion according to the local vascular properties and the consequent morphological changes of the implanted stent and vessel.