Background To investigate the efficacy and safety of a second-generation bipolar transurethral electro vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) with the new oval-shaped electrode for large benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) with prostate volume (PV) ≥100ml. Materials and methods 100 patients who underwent second-generation B-TUVP with the oval-shaped electrode for male lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) or urinary retention between July 2018 and July 2020 were enrolled in this study. The patients’ characteristics and treatment outcome were retrospectively compared between patients with PV <100ml and ≥100ml. Results 17/41 (41.5%) cases of PV ≥100ml and 24/59 cases (40.7%) of PV <100ml were catheterised due to urinary retention. The duration of post-operative catheter placement and hospital-stay of PV ≥100ml (3.1±1.3 and 5.6±2.3 days) were not different from PV <100ml (2.7±1.2 and 5.0±2.4 days). In uncatheterised patients (N = 59), post-void residual urine volume (PVR) significantly decreased after surgery in both groups, however, maximum uroflow rate (Qmax) significantly increased after surgery only in PV <100ml but not in PV ≥100ml. Voiding symptoms and patients’ QoL derived from International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-QoL (IPSS Quality of Life Index) and BPH Impact Index (BII) scores, significantly improved after B-TUVP in both groups. Catheter free status after final B-TUVP among patients with preoperative urinary retention was achieved in 18/24 (75.0%) and 14/17 (82.1%) cases in patient with <100ml and ≥100ml, respectively. There was no significant difference in post-operative Hb after B-TUVP, which was 97.0±5.4% of baseline for PV <100ml and 96.9±6.1% for PV ≥100ml and no TUR syndrome was observed. Conclusions This is the first study investigating short-term efficacy and safety of second-generation B-TUVP with the oval-shaped electrode on large BPE. B-TUVP appears to be effective and safe for treating moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary retention in patients with large BPE.
Objective: To investigate the outcome, determine the predictors for the success of, and evaluate the efficacy of pharmacokinetic therapy on trial catheter removal for women with urinary retention.Methods: Inclusion criteria were female patients with acute urinary retention defined as painful, palpable, or percussive bladder, when the patient is unable to pass any urine, accompanied by postvoid residual (PVR) > 250 ml, and who underwent trial catheter removal between July 2009 and July 2019. Before trial catheter removal, alpha-blockers alone or alpha-blockers and parasympathomimetics (bethanechol or distigmine bromide) were used to facilitate spontaneous voiding in some cases.Results: Fifty-nine of 104 (56.7%) women with urinary retention were catheterfree post trial. There was no significant difference between successful and nonsuccessful trials in average age (p = .392), median ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status (p = .374), diabetes mellitus (p = .842), dementia (p = .801), previous history of cerebrovascular events (p = .592), or intrapelvic surgery (p = .800). Oral medications were administered for 39/59 (66.1%) in the success group and 30/45 (66.7%) patients in the non-success groups (p = .598).Serum albumin (3.2 ± 0.7 g/dl and 2.8 ± 0.8 g/dl, p = .039) and total protein values (6.5 ± 0.8 g/dl and 6.0 ± 1.0 g/dl, p = .038) at diagnosis of urinary retention were higher in the success group than the non-success group, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression found that a serum albumin >3 g/dl was an independent predictor of successful trial catheter removal for women with urinary retention (p = .030, odds ratio [OR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] of OR 1.1-9.9). Age < 70 years old was a likely predictor of successful trial catheter removal (p = .066, OR 4.8, 95% CI of OR 0.9-25.0).Conclusions: This is the first retrospective study to investigate the predictive factors for successful trial catheter removal in women with urinary retention. A serum albumin value >3 mg/dl at diagnosis of urinary retention was a significant independent predictor of catheter-free status after trial catheter removal, and age < 70 years-old was a possible contributor. There was no evidence that oral medication contributed to catheter-free status.
Background Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the kidney is very rare, with only eight cases reported to date. We describe herein what we believe is the first case of hepatic invasion of a primary squamous cell carcinoma that originated in the kidney. Case Presentation A 73-year-old asymptomatic man was referred to our hospital for further evaluation after an abdominal ultrasonography revealed a right renal mass. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a hypodense mass with capsular enhancement from the upper pole of the right kidney to the right lobe of the liver. Ultrasonography-guided renal biopsy was performed to identify the origin of tumor. The pathology indicated a squamous cell carcinoma, but it was unclear whether it was a primary carcinoma of the kidney or a metastatic growth derived from other organs. Chronic fever appeared and the patient’s general malaise worsened day by day. Contrast-enhanced CT one month after the previous one showed rapid growth of the right renal tumor and progressive hepatic invasion. Radical nephrectomy and hepatic resection of the posterior segment by laparotomy was performed. Pathological analysis indicated the origin of this tumor was tubular epithelium, and the patient was diagnosed with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the kidney, pT4. Conclusions This case showed that squamous cell carcinoma of the kidney can invade the liver, and this cancer can progress very rapidly, on a daily basis. When hepatic invasion of renal squamous cell carcinoma is suggested, combined renal-hepatic resection should be considered. In addition, once this disease is suspected, surgery must be performed as soon as possible, considering the speed of its progression.
ObjectiveTo investigate the trial of spontaneous urination without catheter (TWOC) outcomes for men with acute urinary retention, determine successful TWOC predictors, and evaluate the impact of add‐on medication therapy on TWOC.MethodsThis retrospective study included men with acute urinary retention and post‐void residual (PVR) >250 mL who underwent TWOC between July 2009 and July 2019. Patients were divided into a medicated group who received alpha1 blocker on urinary retention diagnosis and a naïve group who did not. The trial was defined as unsuccessful if the PVR was >150 mL or if the patient experienced difficulty emptying their bladder with abdominal discomfort or pain, and a transurethral catheter was reinserted.ResultsAmong 576 men with urinary retention, 269 (46.7%) constituted the medicated group and 307 (53.3%) the naïve. The naïve group comprised more elderly patients (P = 0.010) with higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) (P = 0.001) and smaller prostate volume (P = 0.028) than the other. In the medicated group, 153 men received additional oral medication before TWOC to increase the success rate. There were significant age differences (P = 0.041) in the medicated group and significant median PS differences (P = 0.010) in the naïve group between the successful and unsuccessful outcomes of TWOC. The multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated that age <80 years in medicated patients (P = 0.042, odds ratio [OR] 1.701) and PS <2 in naïve patients (P = 0.001, OR 2.710) were significant independent predictors of successful TWOC outcomes.ConclusionsThis is the first study classifying patients with urinary retention according to medication status. Both medicated and naïve groups had different patient backgrounds and TWOC outcome predictors, suggesting a discrepant etiology behind urinary retention. Hence, acute urinary retention management in men should vary based on medication status for male lower urinary tract symptoms when urinary retention is diagnosed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.