Background: Prospective studies have shown that cognitive impairment is a strong and consistent risk factor of physical disability. However, cognitive impairment has been based on the result of a single screening tool. Objective: To investigate the role of cognition in the subsequent incidence and decline of functional disability in basic activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) after a full assessment of dementia. Methods: A group of 1,358 Japanese atomic bomb survivors aged 61 years or older who lived in the community or in institutions in Hiroshima City were followed for 4 years. During the baseline survey (1993–1995), subjects were administered a screening test for cognitive impairment. Those suspected of dementia underwent a series of cognitive tests (Hasegawa’s dementia scale, Clinical Dementia Rating) and a neurological examination. The diagnosis of dementia was made according to DSM-III-R criteria. Study subjects were questioned about their reported ADL and their IADL. During the follow-up period, deaths were recorded and a follow-up survey (1997–1999) used to assess ADL and IADL performance. Results: Dementia, even after adjustment for age, sex and history of stroke, was a strong predictor of functional disability, as indicated by ADL (odds ratio, OR = 14.0; confidence interval, CI = 5.4–36.3), IADL (OR = 10.1, CI = 2.2–46.4), and also by assessment of decline in ADL (OR = 9.8, CI = 4.2–22.8) or IADL status (OR = 3.9, CI = 1.8–8.3). Conclusion: Dementia is an important determinant of functional status. Deterioration in ADL is more significant than deterioration in IADL, suggesting that factors other than cognition, such as motivation or perceptual, sensory and motor abilities, may be important in IADL performance. This study confirms previous findings on risk factors that affect functional ability and extends our knowledge by examining several criteria of function that are important in the daily lives of elderly people.
IntroductionProvision for the emergence of an influenza pandemic is an urgent issue. The discovery of a novel anti-influenza therapeutic approach would increase the effectiveness of traditional virus-based strategies. This study was undertaken to evaluate the therapeutic effects of anti-high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment on influenza A virus (H1N1)-induced pneumonia in mice.MethodsNine-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with H1N1, then anti-HMGB1 mAb or control mAb were administered intravenously at 1, 24 and 48 hours after H1N1 inoculation and the survival rate was analyzed. Lung lavage and histopathological analysis were performed on days 3, 5, 7 and 10 after inoculation.ResultsAnti-HMGB1 mAb significantly improved the survival rate of H1N1-inoculated mice (1 out of 15 versus 8 out of 15 deaths in the anti-HMGB1 mAb-treated group versus the control mAb-treated group, p < 0.01), although the treatment did not affect virus propagation in the lungs. The treatment also significantly attenuated histological changes and neutrophil infiltration in the lungs of H1N1-inoculated mice. This was associated with inhibition of HMGB1 and suppression of inflammatory cytokine/chemokine expression and oxidative stress enhancement, which were observed in H1N1-inoculated mice. The expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products and nuclear factor κB was attenuated by the treatment.ConclusionsAnti-HMGB1 mAb may provide a novel and effective pharmacological strategy for severe influenza virus infection in humans by reducing the inflammatory responses induced by HMGB1.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0983-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.