Although glucose metabolism and atrial fibrillation (AF) have complex interrelationships, the impact of catheter ablation of AF on glucose status has not been well evaluated. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with a FreeStyle Libre Pro (Abbott) was performed for 48 h pre-procedure, during the procedure, and for 72 h post-procedure in 58 non-diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with symptomatic AF and 20 patients with supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias as a control group. All ablation procedures including pulmonary vein isolation were performed successfully. Glucose levels during procedures consistently increased in the AF and control groups (83.1 ± 16.1 to 110.0 ± 20.5 mg/dL and 83.3 ± 14.7 to 98.6 ± 16.3 mg/dL, respectively, P < 0.001 for both), and Δ glucose levels (max minus min/procedure) were greater in the AF group than control group (P < 0.001). There was a trend toward higher mean glucose levels at 72 h after the procedures compared with those before the procedures in both the AF and control groups (from 103.4 ± 15.6 to 106.1 ± 13.0 mg/dL, P = 0.063 and from 100.2 ± 17.1 to 102.9 ± 16.9 mg/dL, P = 0.052). An acute increase in glucose level at the time of early AF recurrence (N = 9, 15.5%) could be detected by simultaneous CGM and ECG monitoring (89.7 ± 18.0 to 108.3 ± 30.5 mg/dL, P = 0.001). In conclusion, although AF ablation caused a statistically significant increase in the glucose levels during the procedures, it did not result in a pathologically significant change after ablation in non-DM patients. Simultaneous post-procedure CGM and ECG monitoring alerted us to possible acute increases in glucose levels at the onset of AF recurrence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.