Background and Aim To assess the visibility of colorectal lesions using blue laser imaging (BLI)‐bright and linked‐color imaging (LCI) with an eye‐tracking system. Methods Eleven endoscopists evaluated 90 images of 30 colorectal lesions. The lesions were randomly selected. Three images of each lesion comprised white light imaging (WLI), BLI‐bright, and LCI in the same position. Participants gazed at the images, and their eye movements were tracked by the eye tracker. We analyzed whether the participants could detect the lesion and how long they took to detect the lesion. We assessed the miss rate and detection time among the imaging modalities. Results One endoscopist was excluded, and 10 endoscopists were assessed. Overall, 12.6% of lesions were missed with WLI, 6.0% with BLI‐bright, and 4.3% with LCI; the miss rate of BLI‐bright and LCI was significantly lower than that of WLI (P < 0.01), with no significant difference between the former modalities (P = 0.54). Mean (± SD) detection times were 1.58 ± 1.60 s for WLI, 1.01 ± 1.21 s for BLI‐bright, and 1.10 ± 1.16 s for LCI. Detection time for BLI‐bright and LCI was significantly shorter than that for WLI (P < 0.0001), with no significant difference between the former modalities (P = 0.34). Regarding the miss rate and detection time between the expert and the non‐experts, there was a significant difference with WLI but not with BLI‐bright and LCI. Conclusion Blue laser imaging‐bright and LCI improved the detection of colorectal lesions compared with WLI using an eye‐tracking system.

No abstract

We report a rare case of primary hepatic lymphoma, Stage II disease, in a 48-year-old male who had a solitary hepatic tumour measuring 4 x 4.5 x 3 cm. The tumour showed a nodular growth pattern and lymphoepithelial lesions with bile ducts. Some neoplastic nodules had a non-neoplastic atrophic germinal centre and/or a thin mantle cell layer. Morphologically, the neoplastic cells were centrocyte-like cells or intermediate lymphocytes. They expressed L26(CD20)+/LN-1(CDw75)+/-/LN-2(CD74)+/cyclin D1- and had a monotypic immunoglobulin of cytoplasmic IgM (kappa) on paraffin sections. The neoplastic cells or neoplastic nodules expressed surface IgM+/surface IgD+/-/Leu-1(CD5)+/DRC-1+/alkaline phosphatase+/B1(CD20)+/B4(CD19)- on fresh frozen sections. We therefore diagnosed this case as primary hepatic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma with mantle cell lymphoma phenotype. We confirm that it is difficult to differentiate extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (low grade B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type; MALT lymphoma) and mantle cell lymphoma.

MRI was useful to identify nonmalignant IPMTs of the branch duct type, and close follow-up observation with serial MRI examinations may be appropriate in the management of such patients.

Objectives Oxygen saturation (OS) imaging is a new method of endoscopic imaging that has clinical applications in oncology which can directly measure tissue oxygen saturation (Sto2) of the surface of gastrointestinal tract without any additional drugs or devices. This imaging technology is expected to contribute to research into cancer biology which leads to clinical benefit such as prediction to efficacy of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, adherent substances on tumors such as blood and white coating, pose a challenge for accurate measurements of the StO2 values in tumors. The aim of this study was to develop algorithms for discriminating between the tumors and their adherent substances, and to investigate whether it is possible to evaluate the tumor specific StO2 values excluding adherent substances during OS imaging. Methods We plotted areas of tumors and their adherent substances using white-light images of 50 upper digestive tumors: blood (68 plots); reddish tumor (83 plots); white coating (89 plots); and whitish tumor (79 plots). Scatter diagrams and discriminating algorithms using spectrum signal intensity values were constructed and verified using validation datasets. StO2 values were compared between the tumors and tumor adherent substances using OS images of gastrointestinal tumors. Results The discriminating algorithms and their accuracy rates (AR) were as follows: blood vs. reddish tumor: Y> - 4.90X+7.13 (AR: 95.9%) and white coating vs. whitish tumor: Y< -0.52X+0.17 (AR: 96.0%). The StO2 values (median, [range]) were as follows: blood, 79.3% [37.8%–100.0%]; reddish tumor, 74.5% [62.0%–86.9%]; white coating, 73.8% [42.1%–100.0%]; and whitish tumor, 65.7% [53.0%–76.3%]. Conclusions OS imaging is strongly influenced by adherent substances for evaluating the specific StO2 value of tumors; therefore, it is important to eliminate the information of adherent substances for clinical application of OS imaging.