In the spring of 2017 an ER‐2 aircraft campaign was undertaken over continental United States to observe energetic radiation from thunderstorms and lightning. The payload consisted of a suite of instruments designed to detect optical signals, electric fields, and gamma rays from lightning. Starting from Georgia, USA, 16 flights were performed, for a total of about 70 flight hours at a cruise altitude of 20 km. Of these, 45 flight hours were over thunderstorm regions. An analysis of two gamma ray glow events that were observed over Colorado at 21:47 UT on 8 May 2017 is presented. We explore the charge structure of the cloud system, as well as possible mechanisms that can produce the gamma ray glows. The thundercloud system we passed during the gamma ray glow observation had strong convection in the core of the cloud system. Electric field measurements combined with radar and radio measurements suggest an inverted charge structure, with an upper negative charge layer and a lower positive charge layer. Based on modeling results, we were not able to unambiguously determine the production mechanism. Possible mechanisms are either an enhancement of cosmic background locally (above or below 20 km) by an electric field below the local threshold or an enhancement of the cosmic background inside the cloud but then with normal polarity and an electric field well above the Relativistic Runaway Electron Avalanche threshold.
[1] Calibrated measurements of the visible and near-infrared radiation produced by both negative and positive cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning strokes have been made at distances of 5 to 32 km in southern Arizona (AZ) and the central Great Plains using a photodiode sensor with a flat spectral response between 0.4 and 1.0 mm. Time-correlated video images (60 fps) of the channel development provided information about the types of strokes that were detected and reports from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network indicated their locations, polarities, and estimates of their peak current. In our sample of negative strokes that were suitable for analysis, there were 23 first (or only) strokes (FS), 19 subsequent strokes that created new ground contacts (NGC), and 101 subsequent strokes that re-illuminated a preexisting channel (PEC). We also analyzed 10 positive strokes (in nine flashes), and 73 of the larger impulses that were radiated by intracloud discharges (CPs). Assuming that these events can be approximated as isotropic sources and that the effects of atmospheric extinction are negligible, the peak optical power (P o ), total optical energy (E o ), and characteristic widths of the sources (t cw = E o /P o ) have been computed. Median values of P o for negative FS, NGC, and PEC strokes were 1.8 Â 10 10 W, 1.1 Â 10 10 W, and 4.4 Â 10 9 W, respectively. Median values of E o were 3.6 Â 10 6 J, 3.5 Â 10 6 J, and 1.2 Â 10 6 J, respectively. The median characteristic widths of negative FS, NGC, and PEC strokes were 229 ms, 244 ms, and 283 ms, respectively. Positive CG strokes produced a median P o , E o , and t cw of 1.9 Â 10 10 W, 9.3 Â 10 6 J, and 497 ms, respectively. Estimates of the space-and-time-average power per unit length (' o ) in the lower portion of negative FS, NGC, and PEC channels had medians of 2.8 Â 10 6 W/m, 3.2 Â 10 6 W/m, and 1.4 Â 10 6 W/m, respectively, and the median ' o for four positive strokes was 8.8 Â 10 6 W/m. Median values for the estimated peak electromagnetic power (P EM ) radiated at early times in the strokes are 2.0 Â 10 9 W, 2.5 Â 10 9 W, 1.0 Â 10 9 W, and 9.1 Â 10 9 W for FS, NGC, PEC and positive strokes, respectively. CP events produced a median P o , E o , and t cw of 2.0 Â 10 9 W, 0.7 Â 10 6 J, and 311 ms, respectively, and are in good agreement with aircraft and satellite measurements. The values of P o , E o , and ' o for negative CG strokes in AZ are significantly larger than prior measurements in Florida, likely because there is less atmospheric extinction in our dataset, and due to extinction, all the above values of P o , E o , and ' o are lower limits at the source.
Lightning channels are made of plasma. As a consequence, the driving electrical current changes the channel's resistance in a nonlinear fashion. The resistance has an intricate dependence on the history of Joule heating and various cooling processes, as well as on the various kinetic processes that dictate the population balance of electrons within the channel. Such dependence cannot be captured by an analytic function, as often attempted. In this paper, we introduce a minimal numerical model that can qualitatively capture the temporal dynamics of the key plasma properties of a lightning channel, including its electric field, temperature, plasma density, radius, and the resulting nonlinear resistance. Through a series of novel parameterizations, we introduce six zero‐dimensional equations that can capture both nonequilibrium/low‐temperature and local thermodynamic equilibrium/high‐temperature plasma regimes. In this manuscript, we go to great lengths to validate the model, showing that it can reproduce the finite time scale of streamer‐to‐leader transition, replicate the negative differential resistance behavior of steady‐state plasma arcs, and properly describe the temporal evolution of temperature in a return stroke channel. Finally, the model is applied to the simulation of optical emissions from rocket‐triggered lightning strikes, explaining the measured delay between the rise of current and visible light, as well as reproducing the direct relationship between peak current and peak radiated power and between charge transferred to ground and total radiated energy.
The broadband optical radiation covering the visible and near‐infrared (VNIR) spectral regions (0.4–1.0 μm) has been measured from 70 negative return strokes (RS) in rocket‐triggered lightning; 17 events were recorded in 2011, and 53 were recorded in 2012. The radiometers were calibrated, and all measurements were time‐correlated with currents measured at the channel base. The risetime and peak of an irradiance waveform are determined primarily by the RS current and by the geometrical growth and total length of channel that is in the field of view of the sensor. Following an initial peak, the irradiance decays faster than the current until there is a plateau or secondary maximum 20 to 40 μs (median of 22 μs) after the peak current, a time when the current itself is steadily decreasing. Estimates of the space‐ and time‐average optical power per unit length (ℓo) that is emitted at the source during onset of RS have been computed using the measured slopes of 70 irradiance waveforms together with an assumption that the initial speed of propagation is 1.2 × 108 m/s. The values range from 0.25 to 9.5 MW/m, with a mean and standard deviation of 2.4 ± 1.7 MW/m, and they are in good agreement with prior estimates of ℓo that were made by Quick and Krider (2013) for the subsequent return strokes in natural lightning that reilluminate a preexisting channel. The values of ℓo also agree with numerical estimates of the VNIR power per unit length that were computed by Paxton et al. (1986). Estimates of the peak optical power per unit length (ℓR) that is radiated at the source have been derived from the peaks of 53 irradiance waveforms, and the values range from 0.4 to 11 MW/m with a mean and standard deviation of 4.2 ± 2.5 MW/m. Both ℓo and ℓR are approximately proportional to the square of the peak current at the channel base. Estimates of the total optical energy per unit length, Jo, that is radiated in the VNIR have been computed by integrating the irradiance waveforms over 2 ms. The values of Jo have a mean and standard deviation of 150 ± 140 J/m, and they are proportional to the total charge that is transported to ground in that interval.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.