In this consensus document, we attempt to make recommendations that are based on bioanalytical best practices and statistical thinking for development and validation of LBAs.

Abstract. Multiplex ligand binding assays (LBAs) are increasingly being used to support many stages of drug development. The complexity of multiplex assays creates many unique challenges in comparison to single-plexed assays leading to various adjustments for validation and potentially during sample analysis to accommodate all of the analytes being measured. This often requires a compromise in decision making with respect to choosing final assay conditions and acceptance criteria of some key assay parameters, depending on the intended use of the assay. The critical parameters that are impacted due to the added challenges associated with multiplexing include the minimum required dilution (MRD), quality control samples that span the range of all analytes being measured, quantitative ranges which can be compromised for certain targets, achieving parallelism for all analytes of interest, cross-talk across assays, freeze-thaw stability across analytes, among many others. Thus, these challenges also increase the complexity of validating the performance of the assay for its intended use. This paper describes the challenges encountered with multiplex LBAs, discusses the underlying causes, and provides solutions to help overcome these challenges. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to perform a fit-forpurpose-based validation, emphasizing issues that are unique to multiplex kit assays.

The development and validation of ligand binding assays used in the support of pharmacokinetic studies has been the focus of various workshops and publications in recent years, all in an effort to establish a guidance document for standardization of these bioanalytical methods. This summary report of the workshop from 2003 focuses on the issues discussed in presentations and notes points of discussion and areas of consensus among the participants.

Abstract. The L4 Global Harmonization Team on reagents and their stability focused on the management of critical reagents for pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and biomarker ligand binding assays. Regulatory guidance recognizes that reagents are important for ligand binding assays but do not address numerous aspects of critical reagent life cycle management. Reagents can be obtained from external vendors or developed internally, but regardless of their source, there are numerous considerations for their reliable long-term use. The authors have identified current best practices and provided recommendations for critical reagent lot changes, stability management, and documentation.

With the wide use of biomarkers to enable critical drug-development decisions, there is a growing concern from scientific community on the need for a 'standardized process' for ensuring biomarker specimen stability and hence, a strong desire to share best practices on preserving the integrity of biomarker specimens in clinical trials and the design of studies to evaluate analyte stability. By leveraging representative industry experience, we have attempted to provide an overview of critical aspects of biomarker specimen stability commonly encountered during clinical development, including: planning of clinical sample collection procedures, clinical site training, selection of sample preservation buffers, shipping logistics, fit-for-purpose stability assessments in the analytical laboratory and presentation of case studies covering widely utilized biomarker specimen types.