Background Marginal and multilevel logistic regression methods can estimate associations between hospital-level factors and patient-level 30-day mortality outcomes after cardiac surgery. However, it is not widely understood how the interpretation of hospital-level effects differs between these methods. Methods The Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) registry provided data on 32,354 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 18 hospitals from 2001 to 2009. The logistic regression methods related 30-day mortality after surgery to hospital characteristics with concurrent adjustment for patient characteristics. Results Hospital-level mortality rates varied from 1.0% to 4.1% of patients. Ordinary, marginal and multilevel regression methods differed with regard to point estimates and conclusions on statistical significance for hospital-level risk factors; ordinary logistic regression giving inappropriately narrow confidence intervals. The median odds ratio, MOR, from the multilevel model was 1.2 whereas ORs for most patient-level characteristics were of greater magnitude suggesting that unexplained between-hospital variation was not as relevant as patient-level characteristics for understanding mortality rates. For hospital-level characteristics in the multilevel model, 80% interval ORs, IOR-80%, supplemented the usual ORs from the logistic regression. The IOR-80% was (0.8 to 1.8) for academic affiliation and (0.6 to 1.3) for the median annual number of cardiac surgery procedures. The width of these intervals reflected the unexplained variation between hospitals in mortality rates; the inclusion of one in each interval suggested an inability to add meaningfully to explaining variation in mortality rates. Conclusions Marginal and multilevel models take different approaches to account for correlation between patients within hospitals and they lead to different interpretations for hospital-level odds ratios.

Acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery can be predicted using preoperative risk factors alone or, with greater accuracy, using pre-, peri-, and early postoperative risk factors. The ability to identify high-risk individuals can be useful in preoperative patient management and for recruitment of appropriate patients to clinical trials. Prediction in the early stages of postoperative care can guide subsequent intensive care of patients and could also be the basis of a retrospective performance audit tool.

CCT is inversely correlated to optic disc area. Although thicker corneas have been recognised to cause slight overestimation of true intraocular pressure (IOP), they may also indicate the presence of a substantially smaller, and thus more robust, optic nerve head. People with thinner corneas which slightly underestimate the true IOP may also have larger and more deformable optic discs.

Background and aim: To assess the Farsi (Persian) translated and modified version of the questionnaire of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) for measuring professionalism, and also, measuring the professional attitudes and behaviors associated with the medical residency training environment in Iran. Methods: After a pilot study, a 17-item questionnaire was distributed to 282 medical residents of two major universities of Iran, from December 2006 through February 2007. Results: Of the 282 distributed questionnaires, 259 (95.2%) were used in the analysis. Based on the analyses, two items were omitted and 15 items were retained for further analysis. The mean score was 106 (Standard Deviation (SD), 22.4) out of maximum 150, whereas the item mean was 6.12 (SD, 0.37) out of maximum 10. Corrected item-to-total correlations ranged from low to moderate. The internal reliability of the scale, based on Cronbach's alpha, meets Nunnally's minimal requirement. A factor analysis was performed, based on principal components and varimax rotation. The solution identified three factors (subscales) including excellence, honor/integrity and altruism/respect. Together these factors represented 58.8% of the common variance. Conclusion: This study showed the content validity and internal reliability of the Farsi version of the ABIM questionnaire. Therefore, it can be considered as an encouraging step toward developing a short, reliable and valid instrument for measuring professionalism in medical environments.

Introduction In 2018, ARPANSA published updated national DRLs for adult CT, which were first published in 2012, and augmented the national DRL categories. This paper presents the updated national DRLs and describes the process by which they were produced. Methods Examine patient survey data submitted to the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) National Diagnostic Reference Level Service (NDRLS). Determine the quartiles of the distributions of median survey dose metrics with categorisation by procedure type. Engage a liaison panel representing the radiology professions to review procedure categories and recommend revised national DRLs. The revised NDRL procedure categories are: head (non‐contrast brain (trauma/headache)), cervical spine (Non‐contrast (trauma)), soft‐tissue neck (post‐contrast (oncology)), chest (post‐contrast (oncology)), abdomen–pelvis (post‐contrast (oncology)), kidney–ureter–bladder (non‐contrast (suspected renal colic)), chest–abdomen–pelvis (post‐contrast (oncology)) and lumbar spine (non‐contrast (degenerative pain)). Results The existing six procedure categories were revised and refined. Updated Australian national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT were recommended and endorsed for eight procedure categories: head (52 mGy/880 mGycm), cervical spine (23 mGy/470 mGycm),soft‐tissue neck (17 mGy/450 mGycm), chest (10 mGy/390 mGycm), abdomen–pelvis (13 mGy/600 mGycm), kidney–ureter–bladder (13 mGy/600 mGycm), chest–abdomen–pelvis (11 mGy/940 mGycm) and lumbar spine (26 mGy/670 mGycm). The updated national DRLs are between 12 and 26% lower than the previous DRLs for dose‐length product and between 13 and 63% lower for volume computed tomography dose index. Conclusions Australian national DRLs for adult CT have been reviewed and revised. The revised national DRLs are lower, better reflecting current practice among imaging facilities in Australia. The revised Australian national DRLs are similar to those in other developed countries.