Background: Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. Aims: To compare functional and structural improvement, as well as long-term outcome, between diabetic and non-diabetic HF patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods: We compared response to CRT in 141 diabetic and 214 non-diabetic consecutive patients. Major events were; death from any cause, urgent heart transplantation and implantation of a left ventricular (LV) assist device. Frequencies of hospitalisation and defibrillator (CRT-D) discharges were also analyzed. Results: CRT was able to significantly improve functional capacity, ventricular geometry and neurohumoral imbalance in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients over a median follow-up time of 34 months. Overall event-free survival was similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (HR 1.23, p = 0.363), as was survival free from CRT-D interventions (HR 1.72; p = 0.115) and hospitalisations (HR 1.12; p = 0.500). On multivariable analysis, NYHA class IV (p = 0.002), low LV ejection fraction (p = 0.002), absence of beta-blocker therapy (p b 0.001), impaired renal function (p = 0.003), presence of an epicardial lead (p = 0.025), but not diabetes (p = 0.821) were associated with a poor outcome after CRT. Conclusions: Diabetic HF patients treated with CRT had a very favourable functional and survival outcome, which was comparable to nondiabetic patients.

The battle against COVID-19 has entered a new phase with Rehabilitation Centres being among the major players, because the medical outcome of COVID-19 patients does not end with the control of pulmonary inflammation marked by a negative virology test, as many patients continue to suffer from long-COVID-19 syndrome. Exercise training is known to be highly valuable in patients with cardiac or lung disease, and it exerts beneficial effects on the immune system and inflammation. We therefore reviewed past and recent papers about exercise training, considering the multifactorial features characterizing post-COVID-19 patients’ clinical conditions. Consequently, we conceived a proposal for a post-COVID-19 patient exercise protocol as a combination of multiple recommended exercise training regimens. Specifically, we built pre-evaluation and exercise training for post-COVID-19 patients taking advantage of the various programs of exercise already validated for diseases that may share pathophysiological and clinical characteristics with long-COVID-19.

To validate a new modified method for measuring the anthropometric Haller index (HI), obtained without radiological exposure. This new method was based on the use of a rigid ruler and of a 2.5 MHz ultrasound transducer for the assessment of latero-lateral and antero-posterior chest diameters, respectively. We enrolled 100 consecutive patients (mean age 67.9 ± 14.5 years, 55% males), who underwent a two-plane CXR, for any clinical indication, over a four-month period. In all patients, the same radiologist calculated the conventional radiological HI (mean value 1.93 ± 0.35) and the same cardiologist used the above described new technique to measure the modified HI (mean value 1.99 ± 0.26). The Bland-Altman analysis showed tight limits of agreement (+ 0.37; - 0.51) between the two measurement methods, with a mild systematic overestimation of the new method as compared to the standard radiological HI. The Pearson's correlation analysis highlighted a strong correlation between the two methods (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001), while the Student's t test demonstrated a not statistically difference between the means (p = 0.12). The modified HI might allow a quick description of the chest conformation without radiological exposure and a more immediate comprehension of its possible influence on the cardiac kinetics and function, as assessed by echocardiography or other imaging modalities.