No abstract

Careful preoperative identification of the venous drainage pattern seems critical for planning of the correct surgical strategy to treat aggressive intracranial d-AVFs. If the fistula exhibits sinus drainage with reflow into leptomeningeal veins, surgical excision of the fistulous sinus segment represents a safe and definitive treatment option. In these cases, the affected sinus may be safely removed, provided that preoperative angiograms demonstrate participation of the sinus in drainage of the lesion, indicating that the sinus is nonfunctional. Conversely, if the fistula exhibits pure leptomeningeal drainage, the sinus does not participate in drainage of the lesion and cannot be excised. In these cases, the best treatment involves interruption of the draining veins at the point at which they exit the dural wall of the sinus. This simple easy treatment has been proven to be safe and highly effective in permanently eliminating arteriovenous shunts.

Traumatic injuries of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) area are common and frequently the outcome of motor vehicle accidents, falls, and diving accidents. To define and characterize CVJ traumatic injuries, some international classifications are currently in use, and they are thought and focused on junction bone fracture. However, recent data point out a major important role of the CVJ ligaments and membranes in traumatic injuries with a secondary function of the osseous structures. Emphasizing the correct role of the ligaments and membranes is extremely important for determining appropriate medical or surgical planning for patients and also to design new CVJ injury classifications. We reviewed every recent major publication on the ligaments and membranes of the CVJ area. We divided the information into sections concerning anatomy, embryology, biomechanics, trauma, and CVJ bone fractures. A role of the ligaments and membranes in the traumatic injuries of the CVJ area has often been recognized; but only recently, with the increase in the knowledge of the anatomic and biomechanical junction area, supported by neuroradiological tools (magnetic resonance imaging) and a more detailed traumatic injuries assessment, has the role of the ligaments and membranes been highlighted. Ligaments and membranes have a pivotal role in each junctional ability and are the key to orienting any medical or surgical indications in this unique area of the spine.

Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have been recognized as acquired lesions that can behave aggressively depending on the pattern of venous drainage. Based on the type of venous drainage, they can be classified as fistulas drained only by venous sinuses, those drained by venous sinuses with retrograde flow in arterialized leptomeningeal veins, and fistulas drained solely by arterialized leptomeningeal veins. Serious symptoms, including hemorrhage and focal deficit, are related to the presence of arterialized leptomeningeal veins. In this paper, the authors report a consecutive series treated between 1988 and 1993 of 20 cases of intracranial dural AVFs with "pure leptomeningeal drainage." All patients underwent surgical interruption of the leptomeningeal draining veins. Based on the arterial supply, nine patients were managed by direct surgery, whereas 11 patients were prepared for surgery by means of preoperative arterial embolization. Radioanatomical cure of the fistula and good neurological recovery were achieved in 18 cases. Complete obliteration of the fistula was documented angiographically in two cases, but fatal hemorrhage occurred, probably due to partial thrombosis of the venous drainage. Based on this experience, the authors believe that surgical interruption of the draining veins is the best treatment option for intracranial dural AVFs. However, surgical results may be affected by the extension of postoperative thrombosis, which in turn may be related to the degree of preoperative venous engorgement.

Object The authors report on a series of 145 consecutive patients with different types of spine lesions surgically treated via an anterior approach (AA) at the thoracic and lumbar levels during the past 10 years. Indications, techniques, and surgical results are described. Methods This series included 92 patients with fractures, 30 with neoplasms, 13 with thoracic disc hernias, and 10 with spinal infections. Based on the lesion to be addressed, the AA was used for lesion excision, corpectomy, vertebral body reconstruction with cages, realignment, and/or plating or screwing. The approach was extracavitary in 55 patients and intracavitary in 90. In 126 patients (86.8%), neural decompression and spine stabilization were achieved via a stand-alone AA (SA-AA), whereas 19 patients (13.1%) were treated using a 2-stage anteroposterior approach. This circumferential approach was reserved for select cases of severe traumatic dislocation, particular types of tumors, or specific anatomical locations. The authors developed a simple neuronavigation-based method of identifying the severely injured patients who were eligible for the SA-AA by evaluating the angle of lateral dislocation. Results There were no deaths and no instances of major surgery-related morbidity. Minor morbidity was almost always transitory and was reported in 13 patients (8.9%). Neurological improvement was reported in 20% of injured patients with a preoperative incomplete lesion. Postoperatively, all patients were able to stand or at least sit without load pain. During the follow-up (mean ± standard deviation 3.8 ± 2.4 years), there were no cases of failure, fracture, dislocation, or bending of the anterior instrumentation, and the rate of pseudarthrosis was 0%. Conclusion The anterior route provides direct access to most spine diseases and allows optimal neural decompression and the possibility of adequate realignment and strong reconstruction/fixation. Stability of the vertebral column is achieved, resolution of clinical pain is rapid and almost complete, and the rate of surgical complications is very low. The authors assert that the SA-AA offers so many advantages and has such good results that the 2-stage anteroposterior approach can be reserved for a minority of select cases and that the time for using the posterior approach alone is over.