No abstract

Background.Remote pregnancy monitoring is one of the most promising applications of telemedicine; however, the diagnostic value of self-examination using mobile cardiotocography (CTG) devices and remote analysis of the subsequent results has never been properly studied.Objectives. The study aimed to compare the diagnostic usefulness of CTG self-examination using a mobile device to examination performed by a medical professional using a stationary device; and to evaluate the quality of CTG analysis performed remotely.Material and methods. Eighty-two pairs of CTG recordings were collected; each pair consisted of a single recording from an examination performed by a midwife using a stationary device, and another recording from an unassisted patient self-examination using a mobile device. Recordings were performed with a maximum time interval of 30 min. Each recording was analyzed twice. Primary analysis included a comparison of the assisted examination evaluated on-site vs the self-examination evaluated remotely in pairs. Secondary analysis was conducted by an independent expert who evaluated the unpaired recordings. Baseline fetal heart rate (BFHR) values were compared independently. Results.We found that patients were more likely to perform inconclusive recordings than experienced midwives; however, the self-examination feasibility was satisfactory. The primary analysis showed 88.4% agreement of the recorded pairs; 11.6% of inconsistent pairs were due to inter-observer variability or medical reasons. The independent expert's analysis showed 97. 1% agreement between the assisted and unassisted examinations. Paired t-test for BFHR values showed a statistically significant but clinically negligible mean difference between the 2 devices at 1.75 bpm. Conclusions.The CTG examinations performed using mobile devices present satisfactory feasibility and equivalent diagnostic value compared to conventional devices, while the remote evaluation of recordings is as reliable as on-site analysis. Remote pregnancy surveillance is safe, effective and may be implemented into everyday obstetric care.

Background and Objectives: COVID-19 is a pandemic disease, and its unpredictable outcome makes it particularly dangerous, especially for pregnant women. One of the decisions they have to make is where they will give birth. This study aimed to determine the factors influencing the choice of place of delivery and the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on these factors. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 517 respondents from Poland. The research methods comprised the authors’ own survey questionnaire distributed via the Internet from 8 to 23 June 2021. The survey was fully anonymous, voluntary, and addressed to women who gave birth during the pandemic or will give birth shortly. Results: A total of 440 (85.1%) respondents were afraid of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The most frequently indicated factors were fear of complications in the newborn, fear of intrauterine fetal death, and congenital disabilities in a newborn. A total of 74 (14.3%) women considered home delivery. The main factors that discouraged the choice of home birth were the lack of professional medical care 73.1% (N = 378), the lack of anesthesia 23.6% (N = 122), and the presence of indications for caesarean section 23.4% (N = 121). The possibility of mother–child isolation caused the greatest fear about hospital delivery. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women concerned about SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to consider home delivery than those without such fears. The most important factors affecting the choice of the place of delivery included the possibility of a partner’s presence, excellent sanitary conditions and optimal distance from the hospital, and the availability of epidural analgesia for delivery. Conclusions: Our study identifies the determinants of place of delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data we obtained can result in the healthcare system considering patients’ needs in case of similar crisis in the future.

This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance.It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited. Articles in "Ginekologia Polska" are listed in PubMed.