During its science phase from 2002–2017, the low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission Gravity Field Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) provided an insight into Earth’s time-variable gravity (TVG). The unprecedented quality of gravity field solutions from GRACE sensor data improved the understanding of mass changes in Earth’s system considerably. Monthly gravity field solutions as the main products of the GRACE mission, published by several analysis centers (ACs) from Europe, USA and China, became indispensable products for quantifying terrestrial water storage, ice sheet mass balance and sea level change. The successor mission GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) was launched in May 2018 and proceeds observing Earth’s TVG. The Institute of Geodesy (IfE) at Leibniz University Hannover (LUH) is one of the most recent ACs. The purpose of this article is to give a detailed insight into the gravity field recovery processing strategy applied at LUH; to compare the obtained gravity field results to the gravity field solutions of other established ACs; and to compare the GRACE-FO performance to that of the preceding GRACE mission in terms of post-fit residuals. We use the in-house-developed MATLAB-based GRACE-SIGMA software to compute unconstrained solutions based on the generalized orbit determination of 3 h arcs. K-band range-rates (KBRR) and kinematic orbits are used as (pseudo)-observations. A comparison of the obtained solutions to the results of the GRACE-FO Science Data System (SDS) and Combination Service for Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) ACs, reveals a competitive quality of our solutions. While the spectral and spatial noise levels slightly differ, the signal content of the solutions is similar among all ACs. The carried out comparison of GRACE and GRACE-FO KBRR post-fit residuals highlights an improvement of the GRACE-FO K-band ranging system performance. The overall amplitude of GRACE-FO post-fit residuals is about three times smaller, compared to GRACE. GRACE-FO post-fit residuals show less systematics, compared to GRACE. Nevertheless, the power spectral density of GRACE-FO and GRACE post-fit residuals is dominated by similar spikes located at multiples of the orbital and daily frequencies. To our knowledge, the detailed origin of these spikes and their influence on the gravity field recovery quality were not addressed in any study so far and therefore deserve further attention in the future. Presented results are based on 29 monthly gravity field solutions from June 2018 until December 2020. The regularly updated LUH-GRACE-FO-2020 time series of monthly gravity field solutions can be found on the website of the International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM) and in LUH’s research data repository. These operationally published products complement the time series of the already established ACs and allow for a continuous and independent assessment of mass changes in Earth’s system.

<p>From the investigation of GRACE and GRACE-FO instrument data, we are aware of quite a number of unmodeled effects and deficiencies in the calibration of instruments. We want to use these deficiencies as an example to discuss how for a core GGOS observation technique, such as GRACE / GRACE-FO, all opportunities to assess and improve sensor calibration and to identify and characterize unmodeled effects affecting the measurements should be explored. This may seem obvious, but we will show that a major effort on this field would be very desirable. We deliberately choose the GGOS session for a broader discussion of the topic, and we want to highlight the importance of an overarching approach that combines insight from different satellite missions and space techniques.</p>

<p>GRACE and GRACE-FO K-band range-rate post-fit residuals obtained after a common estimation of monthly gravity field coefficients and ancillary satellite parameters represent a complex superposition of different effects. In this contribution, we analyze the component of the residuals that is related to geophysical effects. We low pass filter and differentiate range rate post fit residuals to obtain residual range accelerations. A spectral analysis of globaly gridded residual range accelerations reveals unmodeled signal related to (ocean) tides and hydrology. The time series with approximately 100 millios of data records allows us to identify main periodic contributors in different bands. Diurnal and semi diurnal signal can be resolved on a 5x5 degree grid, while periods of 5 and 3 hours can be resolved on a 7.5x7.5 and 10x10 degree grid.</p>

<p>The dual-satellite mission GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) was launched in May 2018 as the successor of the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE). In May 2019 first level 1 data products were made available to the community and are now published regularly. These products, among others, include orbits, accelerometer measurements, star camera data and micron and sub-micron precise inter-satellite range measurements. The data products are used by different groups to compute estimates of monthly gravity fields of the Earth. The in-house developed GRACE-SIGMA software is used at the Institut of Geodesy/Leibniz University Hannover for the estimation of monthly gravity fields. Several parts of the software’s processing chain, such as background modeling, were updated recently and different parametrization scenarios were tested. First solutions were estimated based on laser ranging interferometer measurements. Moreover, different orbit types, such as reduced-dynamic and kinematic, were tested. In this contribution, we present the influence of these updates and tests on the quality of the gravity fields. The obtained solutions are assessed in terms of error degree standard deviations and post-fit residuals of the inter-satellite measurements.</p>

No abstract