Methylation is one of the major epigenetic processes pivotal to our understanding of carcinogenesis. It is now widely accepted that there is a relationship between DNA methylation, chromatin structure, and human malignancies. DNA methylation is potentially an important clinical marker in cancer molecular diagnostics. Understanding epigenetic modifications in their biological context involves several aspects of DNA methylation analysis. These aspects include the de novo discovery of differentially methylated genes, the analysis of methylation patterns, and the determination of differences in the degree of methylation. Here we present a previously uncharacterized method for high-throughput DNA methylation analysis that utilizes MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of base-specifically cleaved amplification products. We use the IGF2͞H19 region to show that a single base-specific cleavage reaction is sufficient to discover methylation sites and to determine methylation ratios within a selected target region. A combination of cleavage reactions enables the complete evaluation of all relevant aspects of DNA methylation, with most CpGs represented in multiple reactions. We successfully applied this technology under high-throughput conditions to quantitatively assess methylation differences between normal and neoplastic lung cancer tissue samples from 48 patients in 47 genes and demonstrate that the quantitative methylation results allow accurate classification of samples according to their histopathology. lung cancer ͉ MALDI-TOF MS ͉ epigenetics
The four transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc can induce pluripotency in mouse and human fibroblasts. We previously described direct reprogramming of adult mouse neural stem cells (NSCs) by Oct4 and either Klf4 or c-Myc. NSCs endogenously express Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4 as well as several intermediate reprogramming markers. Here we report that exogenous expression of the germline-specific transcription factor Oct4 is sufficient to generate pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse NSCs. These one-factor induced pluripotent stem cells (1F iPS) are similar to embryonic stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Not only can these cells can be efficiently differentiated into NSCs, cardiomyocytes, and germ cells in vitro, but they are also capable of teratoma formation and germline transmission in vivo. Our results demonstrate that Oct4 is required and sufficient to directly reprogram NSCs to pluripotency.
Purpose:To determine whether maternal plasma cell–free DNA sequencing can effectively
identify trisomy 18 and 13.Methods:Sixty-two pregnancies with trisomy 18 and 12 with trisomy 13 were selected from a
cohort of 4,664 pregnancies along with matched euploid controls (including 212
additional Down syndrome and matched controls already reported), and their samples
tested using a laboratory-developed, next-generation sequencing test. Interpretation of
the results for chromosome 18 and 13 included adjustment for CG content bias.Results:Among the 99.1% of samples interpreted (1,971/1,988), observed trisomy 18 and 13
detection rates were 100% (59/59) and 91.7% (11/12) at false-positive rates of 0.28% and
0.97%, respectively. Among the 17 samples without an interpretation, three were trisomy
18. If z-score cutoffs for trisomy 18 and 13 were raised slightly, the overall
false-positive rates for the three aneuploidies could be as low as 0.1% (2/1,688) at an
overall detection rate of 98.9% (280/283) for common aneuploidies. An independent
academic laboratory confirmed performance in a subset.Conclusion:Among high-risk pregnancies, sequencing circulating cell–free DNA detects nearly
all cases of Down syndrome, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13, at a low false-positive rate.
This can potentially reduce invasive diagnostic procedures and related fetal losses by
95%. Evidence supports clinical testing for these aneuploidies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.