The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative validated consensus-based reference values for 169 radiomics features, thus enabling calibration and verification of radiomics software. Key results: • research teams found agreement for calculation of 169 radiomics features derived from a digital phantom and a human lung cancer on CT scan. • Of these 169 candidate radiomics features, good to excellent reproducibility was achieved for 167 radiomics features using MRI, 18F-FDG PET and CT images obtained in 51 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma.
18 F-FDG PET is often used in clinical routine for diagnosis, staging, and response to therapy assessment or prediction. The standardized uptake value (SUV) in the primary or regional area is the most common quantitative measurement derived from PET images used for those purposes. The aim of this study was to propose and evaluate new parameters obtained by textural analysis of baseline PET scans for the prediction of therapy response in esophageal cancer. Methods: Forty-one patients with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer treated with combined radiochemotherapy were included in this study. All patients underwent pretreatment whole-body 18 F-FDG PET. Patients were treated with radiotherapy and alkylatinlike agents (5-fluorouracil-cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil-carboplatin). Patients were classified as nonresponders (progressive or stable disease), partial responders, or complete responders according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Different imagederived indices obtained from the pretreatment PET tumor images were considered. These included usual indices such as maximum SUV, peak SUV, and mean SUV and a total of 38 features (such as entropy, size, and magnitude of local and global heterogeneous and homogeneous tumor regions) extracted from the 5 different textures considered. The capacity of each parameter to classify patients with respect to response to therapy was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P , 0.05). Specificity and sensitivity (including 95% confidence intervals) for each of the studied parameters were derived using receiver-operatingcharacteristic curves. Results: Relationships between pairs of voxels, characterizing local tumor metabolic nonuniformities, were able to significantly differentiate all 3 patient groups (P , 0.0006). Regional measures of tumor characteristics, such as size of nonuniform metabolic regions and corresponding intensity nonuniformities within these regions, were also significant factors for prediction of response to therapy (P 5 0.0002). Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis showed that tumor textural analysis can provide nonresponder, partialresponder, and complete-responder patient identification with higher sensitivity (76%-92%) than any SUV measurement. Conclusion: Textural features of tumor metabolic distribution extracted from baseline 18 F-FDG PET images allow for the best stratification of esophageal carcinoma patients in the context of therapy-response prediction.
Intratumoral uptake heterogeneity in 18 F-FDG PET has been associated with patient treatment outcomes in several cancer types. Textural feature analysis is a promising method for its quantification. An open issue associated with textural features for the quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity concerns its added contribution and dependence on the metabolically active tumor volume (MATV), which has already been shown to be a significant predictive and prognostic parameter. Our objective was to address this question using a larger cohort of patients covering different cancer types. Methods: A single database of 555 pretreatment 18 F-FDG PET images (breast, cervix, esophageal, head and neck, and lung cancer tumors) was assembled. Four robust and reproducible textural feature-derived parameters were considered. The issues associated with the calculation of textural features using co-occurrence matrices (such as the quantization and spatial directionality relationships) were also investigated. The relationship between these features and MATV, as well as among the features themselves, was investigated using Spearman rank coefficients for different volume ranges. The complementary prognostic value of MATV and textural features was assessed through multivariate Cox analysis in the esophageal and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohorts. Results: A large range of MATVs was included in the population considered (3-415 cm 3 ; mean, 35; median,19; SD, 50). The correlation between MATV and textural features varied greatly depending on the MATVs, with reduced correlation for increasing volumes. These findings were reproducible across the different cancer types. The quantization and calculation methods both had an impact on the correlation. Volume and heterogeneity were independent prognostic factors (P 5 0.0053 and 0.0093, respectively) along with stage (P 5 0.002) in non-small cell lung cancer, but in the esophageal tumors, volume and heterogeneity had less complementary value because of smaller overall volumes. Conclusion: Our results suggest that heterogeneity quantification and volume may provide valuable complementary information for volumes above 10 cm 3 , although the complementary information increases substantially with larger volumes. Fordi agnosis and staging in oncology, 18 F-FDG PET/CT is a powerful tool (1). Its use in therapy assessment (2,3) is increasing. Within this context, more emphasis is being given to image-derived indices (4). On the one hand, features extracted from PET images, including metabolically active tumor volume (MATV), mean standardized uptake value (SUV), and total lesion glycolysis, have provided potentially higher prognostic value than standard maximum SUV in various cancer types (5). On the other hand, more recently the heterogeneity of 18 F-FDG uptake within tumors has been associated with treatment failure (4,6-8). Proposed approaches to assessing the heterogeneity of intratumoral activity distribution include visual evaluation (9), SUV coefficient of variation (10), area under...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.