No abstract

To review the orthopedic sequelae of pediatric patients diagnosed with osteoarticular infections (OAIs) and identify significant differences between those with and without sequelae. Medical charts between 2010 and 2016 from a tertiary-care pediatric hospital were reviewed to collect demographic and clinical data for this retrospective case series. The main inclusion criteria were: The following late sequelae were observed and aggregated: osteal deformations that led to limb-length discrepancies (LLD) superior to 5 mm, abnormal articular angulations of more than 5°, and symptomatic chondropathies visible on imaging studies after 1 year. The patients were divided into 2 subgroups: with and without sequelae. Chi-Squared tests were used for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous data to identify statistically significant differences between the 2 subgroups. Among 401 patients with osteomyelitis and/or septic arthritis, 50 (12.5%) were included (24 girls and 26 boys). There were 36 (72%) cases of osteomyelitis, 8 (16%) cases of septic arthritis, and 6 (12%) cases of combined infection (3 acute/subacute and 3 chronic cases). Five (10%) patients had orthopedic sequelae at the latest follow-up. The total duration of antibiotic treatment (P = .002), infectious disease follow-up (P = .002), and the presence of sequestra (P = .005) were significantly different between subgroups. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 subgroups for the other variables, but some trends could be discerned. Only 4/50 patients developed a sequestrum, 2 of which were in the orthopedic sequelae subgroup. Furthermore, initial C-reactive protein (CRP) values were higher in the sequelae subgroup, as were the CRP values at hospital discharge. The orthopedic follow-up was also longer in the sequelae subgroup. Finally, the delay between the onset of symptoms and the beginning of antibiotic treatment was longer in the sequelae group. Patients with orthopedic sequelae had a longer antibiotic treatment and infectious disease follow-up, and were more likely to have presented with a sequestrum. Level of evidence: IV – case series.

No abstract

Background: Syndesmotic injuries have a higher prevalence in athletes and can present long-term complications particularly in pediatric population. Early diagnosis is necessary and can be done using various modalities, but, they either present poor sensitivity, poor clinical feasibility or are exclusively static. Ultrasound (US) could compensate for those drawbacks. Hypothesis/Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine (1) the benefit of direct visualization of the anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (AiTFL) and (2) tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) cut-off points regarding the integrity of the syndesmotic ligaments using US imaging. Methods: A prospective cohort study including all suspected syndesmotic injury in a pediatric population was done. Participants had both ankles assessed with US imaging for description of AiTFL integrity as our static assessment and for TFCS measures as our dynamic evaluation. For dynamic assessment, the distance between the distal tibia and fibula was first measure in neutral position then in external rotation for each ankle. This providing a total of five different TFCS combinations for receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves analysis. Afterward, the syndesmotic ligament complex and deltoid ligament of the injured ankle were examined using MRI as the gold standard. Results: A total of 26 participants with suspected syndesmotic injuries were included. Mean age was 14.8 years (SD = 1.3 years). Mean time between trauma and US imaging was 56 days (SD = 43.9 days). Sensitivity and specificity of direct visualization of the AiTFL were respectively 0.79 and 1.00 with four false negative tests only found on partial tears. Only two TFCS combinations had an area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.7 and were then considered for further analysis. The two combinations were the TFCS difference between the injured and uninjured ankle in neutral position (TFCS N I-U) and external rotation (TFCS ER I-U). Cut-off points were ranging from 0.23 mm to 0.37 mm for TFCS N I-U and from 0.11 mm to 0. 30 mm for TFCS ER I-U using ROC curve analysis. Conclusion: US imaging does bring an added value as a screening tool for direct visualization of the AiTFL in pediatric patients by having a good sensitivity, an excellent specificity, a low cost and being easily accessible. The complementary use of dynamic evaluation using TFCS measures could also identify dynamic instability. Cut-off points determined in this study had good sensitivity and specificity but, by being under one millimeter, further studies using dynamic US imaging are needed.