2 pieces and made into a traditional Y-shaped configuration using CV-2 Goretex sutures. The graft is introduced through the 12 mm assistant port and used to perform robotic sacrocolpopexy. Patients were followed with subjective SEAPI scores, visual analog pain (VAP) scores (range 0-10), pelvic examination (Baden-Walker grading), and examination of the thigh harvest site.RESULTS: The Total Autologous Fascia Lata Robotic Sacrocolpopexy has been performed on 5 patients with a mean age of 61 and a mean follow-up of 5.2 weeks. Four patients were posthysterectomy and one patient underwent concurrent hysterectomy. Two patients underwent concurrent sigmoid resection and rectopexy for rectal prolapse and one patient underwent concurrent autologous pubovaginal sling. Symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse resolved in all 5 patients, and mean Baden-Walker grading was 0, 0, and 0.2 in the anterior, apical, and posterior compartments, respectively. Two patients complained of de novo stress incontinence and 3 patients had unchanged urge incontinence on postoperative SEAPI scoring. One patient required lysis of a concurrent pubovaginal sling 5 weeks postoperatively for urinary retention. The mean VAP score at the harvest site was 0.6, and 3 patients developed parathesia near the harvest site. One patient developed a painless thigh hernia and 2 patients developed a seroma at the harvest site all of which were managed expectantly.CONCLUSIONS: Total Autologous Fascia Lata Robotic Sacrocolpopexy is a feasible alternative to mesh sacrocolpopexy in the post-mesh era and appears to be safe and efficacious with short-term follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the long term success and possible complications of the procedure. Although self-reported pain scores were low, patients should be aware of the risk of possible development of postoperative thigh hernia or seroma at the harvest site.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.