Purpose To determine cutof values for the Knee Society Scores (KSS) indicative of a categorical scale of medium-term outcomes. Methods One hundred and ifty-ive patients who underwent primary cruciate-retaining TKA with a patellar button for osteoarthritis at a single-centre were assessed prospectively by the KSS and short-form Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) simultaneously at the 3-year follow-up. A validated categorization of the WOMAC score was used as a standard. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) was used to assess the discriminative analysis accuracy of the, and the Youden index estimated the optimal cutof point. Results For the KSS-knee score, the cutof for an excellent outcome was 90.3 (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.78), 76.6 (AUC 76.6, 95% CI 0.70-076) for good, 64.8 (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.79) for fair, and < 64.8 (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.73) for poor. For the KSS-function score, the cutof values were 85.2 (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.69-0.75), 73.1 (AUC 0.72, 95% CI, 0.70-0.76), 55.7 (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.71-0.74), and < 55.7 (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.66-0.72), respectively. Conclusion A KSS-knee score ≥ of 90 was considered an excellent outcome, 77 good, 65 fair, and < 65 poor. For the KSSfunction, those values are 85, 73, 56 and < 56, respectively. The treatment outcome's judgement may be clearer for the surgeon concerning a particular patient when using cutof values for the scoring system employed, such as those determined in the present study. Level of evidence II.

Aims The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were long-term differences in outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) undertaken for acute proximal humeral fracture versus rotator cuff deficiency with a minimum follow-up of five years. Methods This was a prospective cohort study comparing 67 patients with acute complex proximal humeral fracture and 64 patients with irreparable rotator cuff deficiency who underwent primary RSA. In the fracture group, there were 52 (77.6%) females and 15 (22.4%) males, with a mean age of 73.5 years (51 to 85), while in the arthropathy group, there were 43 (67.1%) females and 21 (32.9%) males, with a mean age of 70.6 years (50 to 84). Patients were assessed by the Constant score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder score (UCLA), short version of the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH), and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Radiological evaluation was also performed. Results Mean follow-up was 8.4 years (5 to 11). There were no significant differences in mean absolute (p = 0.125) or adjusted (p = 0.569) Constant, UCLA (p = 0.088), QuickDASH (p = 0.135), VAS-pain (p = 0.062), or range of movement at the final follow-up. However, patient satisfaction was significantly lower in the fracture group (p = 0.002). The complication rate was 1.5% (one patient) versus 9.3% (six patients), and the revision rate was 1.5% (one patient) versus 7.8% (five patients) in the fracture and arthropathy groups, respectively. The ten-year arthroplasty survival was not significantly different (p = 0.221). Conclusion RSA may be used not only for patients with irreparable rotator cuff deficiencies, but also for those with acute complex proximal humeral fractures. We found that RSA provided similar functional outcomes and a low revision rate for both indications at long-term. However, satisfaction is lower in patients with an acute fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1555–1559.

PurposeTo compare the clinical outcomes and survival at long‐term between hybrid and cemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A better clinical outcome and survival following a follow‐up as long as 15 years with the use of hybrid fixation as compared with cemented fixation was hypothesized. MethodsCase–control study of 126 patients with a mean age of 62.4 years who underwent hybrid TKA matched with 126 patients underwent cemented TKA. Clinical outcome was assessed by the Knee Society scores (KSS) and reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities questionnaire (WOMAC). Radiological assessment was made by the Knee Society method. ResultsThe mean follow‐up was 15.7 (range 15–17) years. At the final follow‐up, clinical scores were significantly better in the hybrid group, although the differences were not clinically relevant. Revisions for all reasons were performed in five knees in the hybrid group and 15 knees in the cemented group (p = 0.033). In the hybrid group, there was one aseptic femoral loosening and no aseptic tibial loosening. In the cemented group, the main reasons for aseptic revisions were polyethylene wear (six knees) and tibial loosening (four knees). Cemented fixation was a significant risk factor for aseptic revision (hazard ratio 2.3; 95% CI 1.3–3.7%; p = 0.004). Survival at 15 years for aseptic reasons was 96.5% (95% CI 93.4–98.7%) in hybrid groups and 90.3% (95% CI 88.7–93.9%) in cemented group (p = 0.020). ConclusionAfter a minimum follow‐up of 15 years, hybrid fixation of primary TKA for osteoarthritis provide significantly higher clinical benefits compared with cemented fixation, but the differences were not clinically relevant. Hybrid fixation provides longer overall survival, although the femoral component survival was similar between groups. Level of evidenceIII.

No abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in engagement in physical, leisure and social activities in older adults following primary TKA. MethodsA prospective study of 106 patients with a mean age of 72.6 (SD 7.4) years undergoing primary TKA was performed. Physical, social and leisure activities performed by the patients preoperatively and postoperatively at 3‐year were recorded. Activities were selected according to the age, and grouped as passive, moderate and high intensity. The energy spent in each activity was expressed in Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) units. Charlson Comorbidity Index, Mini‐mental test and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) scores were also used. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of active patients. ResultsMean WOMAC significantly improved from preoperative (34.8, SD 11.8) to final follow‐up (74.4, SD 11.1) (p = 0.001), and the mean energy spent increased from 10.7 (SD 13.6) to 28.2 (SD 16.2) MET‐hour weekly (p = 0.001) with a decrease in the passive activities and increase in the moderate activities. However, the participation in high‐intensity activities according to age was negligible. Only 65 (61.3%) patients were considered active postoperatively (weekly spending ≥ 40 MET), although the WOMAC scores were not significantly different between active and sedentary patients. Active patients compared with sedentary patients had a significant increase in engagement in physical, social and leisure activities, and a decrease in passive activities. Female gender (p = 0.037), less preoperatively participation in passive activities (p = 0.042), and greater participation in social activities (p = 0.027) were significant predictors of active patients at the final follow‐up. ConclusionOverall, most patients increased their activity level postoperatively. However, 38.6% of patients had no increased engagement in moderate physical, social or leisure activities at the medium‐term despite improvements in pain and function provided by TKA. Level of evidenceII.