Protein misfolding and deposition underlie an increasing number of debilitating human disorders. We have shown that model proteins unrelated to disease, such as the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain of the p58␣ subunit of bovine phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase (PI3-SH3), can be converted in vitro into assemblies with structural and cytotoxic properties similar to those of pathological aggregates. By contrast, homologous proteins, such as ␣-spectrin-SH3, lack the capability of forming amyloid fibrils at a measurable rate under any of the conditions we have so far examined. However, transplanting a small sequence stretch (6 aa) from PI3-SH3 to ␣-spectrin-SH3, comprising residues of the diverging turn and adjacent RT loop, creates an amyloidogenic protein closely similar in its behavior to the original PI3-SH3. Analysis of specific PI3-SH3 mutants further confirms the involvement of this region in conferring amyloidogenic properties to this domain. Moreover, the inclusion in this stretch of two consensus residues favored in SH3 sequences substantially inhibits aggregation. These findings show that short specific amino acid stretches can act as mediators or facilitators in the incorporation of globular proteins into amyloid structures, and they support the suggestion that natural protein sequences have evolved in part to code for structural characteristics other than those included in the native fold, such as avoidance of aggregation.protein misfolding ͉ protein aggregation ͉ protein evolution T he spontaneous conversion of soluble proteins or protein fragments into aggregates and amyloid fibrils is a challenging problem in biological and medical sciences. An increasing body of evidence supports the anomalous misassembly of proteins into insoluble deposits as the fundamental cause behind a growing number of debilitating human disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes, and the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (1-4). Important clues to understand the molecular basis of amyloid diseases and, more generally, the biological significance of protein aggregation have emerged recently from observations made in proteins unrelated to human disease, which have been found to convert in vitro into aggregates with structural and cytotoxic properties indistinguishable from those exhibited by amyloid assemblies associated with pathological conditions (5-14).The Src homology 3 (SH3) domain of the p58␣ subunit of phosphatidyl-inositol-3Ј-kinase (PI3-SH3) is one of the best characterized examples of a small globular protein unrelated to any known pathological condition that can form amyloid fibrils in vitro (5,15,16). Aggregated species obtained from this protein have been found to be cytotoxic when added to cell cultures (13). This observation suggests that the protein aggregates underlying different human disorders could show similar mechanisms of cytotoxicity and more generally that during evolution nature had to develop strategies to avoid protein misassembly to preserve the viability of liv...

Cyclin T1 has been identi®ed recently as a regulatory subunit of CDK9 and as a component of the transcription elongation factor P-TEFb. Cyclin T1/CDK9 complexes phosphorylate the carboxy terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) in vitro. Here we report that the levels of cyclin T1 are dramatically upregulated by two independent signaling pathways triggered respectively by PMA and PHA in primary human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Activation of these two pathways in tandem is su cient for PBLs to enter and progress through the cell cycle. However, the expression of cyclin T1 is not growth and/or cell cycle regulated in other cell types, indicating that regulation of cyclin T1 expression is dependent on tissue-speci®c signaling pathways. Upregulation of cyclin T1 in stimulated PBLs results in induction of the CTD kinase activity of the cyclin T1/CDK9 complex, which in turn correlates directly with phosphorylation of RNAP II in vivo, linking for the ®rst time activation of the cyclin T1/ CDK9 pair with phosphorylation of RNAP II in vivo. In addition, we report here that endogenous CDK9 and cyclin T1 complexes associate with HIV-1 generated Tat in relevant cells and under physiological conditions (HIV-1 infected T cells). This, together with our results showing that HIV-1 replication in stimulated PBLs correlates with the levels of cyclin T1 protein and associated CTD kinase activity, suggests that the cyclin T1/CDK9 pair is one of the HIV-1 required host cellular cofactors generated during T cell activation.

Mitogenic stimulation leads to activation of G 1 cyclindependent kinases (CDKs), which phosphorylate pocket proteins and trigger progression through the G 0 /G 1 and G 1 /S transitions of the cell cycle. However, the individual role of G 1 cyclin-CDK complexes in the coordinated regulation of pocket proteins and their interaction with E2F family members is not fully understood. Here we report that individually or in concert cyclin D1-CDK and cyclin E-CDK complexes induce distinct and coordinated phosphorylation of endogenous pocket proteins, which also has distinct consequences in the regulation of pocket protein interactions with E2F4 and the expression of p107 and E2F1, both E2F-regulated genes. The up-regulation of these two proteins and the release of p130 and pRB from E2F4 complexes allows formation of E2F1 complexes not only with pRB but also with p130 and p107 as well as the formation of p107-E2F4 complexes. The formation of these complexes occurs in the presence of active cyclin D1-CDK and cyclin E-CDK complexes, indicating that whereas phosphorylation plays a role in the abrogation of certain pocket protein/E2F interactions, these same activities induce the formation of other complexes in the context of a cell expressing endogenous levels of pocket and E2F proteins. Of note, phosphorylated p130 "form 3," which does not interact with E2F4, readily interacts with E2F1. Our data also demonstrate that ectopic overexpression of either cyclin is sufficient to induce mitogen-independent growth in human T98G and Rat-1 cells, although the effects of cyclin D1 require downstream activation of cyclin E-CDK2 activity. Interestingly, in T98G cells, cyclin D1 induces cell cycle progression more potently than cyclin E. This suggests that cyclin D1 activates pathways independently of cyclin E that ensure timely progression through the cell cycle.G 1 cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 1 regulate progression through the G 0 /G 1 transition and entry into the S-phase of the cell cycle following activation by mitogenic signaling pathways (1-5). G 1 CDKs phosphorylate the three members of the retinoblastoma family of pocket proteins, pRB, p107, and p130, resulting in cell cycle-dependent inactivation of their growth suppressor activities (6 -13) (reviewed in Ref. 14).Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E in primary or immortal, nontransformed mammalian fibroblasts shortens the G 1 phase of the cell cycle (15-17). The relatively modest effects of ectopic expression of G 1 cyclins in primary or immortal, nontransformed mammalian fibroblasts are probably due to a requirement for additional events to ensure full activation of these complexes. Whereas cyclins are limiting subunits for activation of their corresponding CDKs, full activation of cyclin-CDK complexes requires other events also dependent upon mitogenic stimulation (reviewed in . In agreement with this idea, microinjection of purified recombinant active cyclin D1-CDK4 or cyclin E-CDK2 complexes in human primary lung fibroblasts bypasses the requirement for mitogen...

Animal models have been critical in the study of the molecular mechanisms of cancer and in the development of new antitumor agents; nevertheless, there is still much room for improvement. The relevance of each particular model depends on how close it replicates the histology, physiological effects, biochemical pathways and metastatic pattern observed in the same human tumor type. Metastases are especially important because they are the main determinants of the clinical course of the disease and patient survival, and are the target of systemic therapy. The generation of clinically relevant models using the mouse requires their humanization, since differences exist in transformation and oncogenesis between human and mouse. Although genetically modified (GM) mice have been instrumental in understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in tumor initiation, they have been less successful in replicating advanced cancer. Moreover, a particular genetic alteration frequently leads to different tumor types in human and mouse and to lower metastastatic rates in GM mice than in humans. These findings question the capacity of current GM mouse carcinoma models to predict clinical response to therapy. On the other hand, orthotopic (ORT) xenografts of human tumors, or tumor cell lines, in nude mice reproduce the histology and metastatic pattern of most human tumors at advanced stage. Using ex vivo genetic manipulation of human tumor cells, ORT models can be used to molecularly dissect the metastatic process and to evaluate in vivo tumor response to therapy, using non-invasive procedures. Nevertheless, this approach is not useful in the study of the initial stages of tumorigenesis or the contribution of the immune system in this process. Despite ORT models are more promising than the most commonly used subcutaneous xenografts in preclinical drug development, their capacity to predict clinical response to antitumor agents remains to be studied. Humanizing mouse models of cancer will most likely require the combined use of currently available methodologies.