Various studies have shown that bee-collected pollen sold as nutritional supplements may contain toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and, thus, pose a potential health risk for consumers. The level of contamination may vary according to its geographical and botanical origin. Here, the PA content of pollen produced in Switzerland was studied and 32 commercially available bee-collected pollen supplements produced between 2010 and 2014 were analysed. In addition, at what time period bees collect PA-containing pollen was investigated. Hence, this study looked into the occurrence of PAs in pollen samples collected daily during two-to-three consecutive seasons. Furthermore, the PA spectrum in pollen was compared to the spectrum found in flower heads of PA-plants to unambiguously identify plants responsible for PA contamination of pollen. The PA concentration of commercial and daily collected pollen was determined by target analysis using an HPLC-MS/MS system, allowing the detection of 18 different PAs and PA N-oxides found in the genera Echium, Eupatorium and Senecio, while the comparison of the PA spectrum in pollen and flower heads was performed by LC-HR-MS, allowing the detection of all PA types in a sample, including saturated, non-carcinogenic PAs. Of the commercially available pollen, 31% contained PAs with a mean concentration of 319 ng/g, mainly Echium- and Eupatorium-type PAs, while the PA concentrations were below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) in 69% of the pollen samples. Bees collected pollen containing Echium-type PAs mainly in June and July, while they gathered pollen containing Eupatorium-type PAs from mid-July to August. Senecio-type PAs appeared from June to September. Comparison of the PA array in pollen and plants identified E. vulgare and E. cannabinum as the main plants responsible for PA contamination of Swiss bee-collected pollen, and to a lesser extent also identified plants belonging to the genus Senecio.

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) in honey can be a potential human health risk. So far, it has remained unclear whether PAs in honey originate from pollen or floral nectar. We obtained honey, nectar, and plant pollen from two observation sites where Echium vulgare L. was naturally abundant. The PA concentration of honey was determined by targeted analysis using a high pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry system (HPLC-MS/MS), allowing the quantification of six different PAs and PA-N-oxides present in E. vulgare. Echium-type PAs were detected up to 0.153 μg/g in honey. Nectar and plant pollen were analyzed by nontargeted analysis using ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography-high resolution-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-MS), allowing the detection of 10 alkaloids in small size samples. Echium-type PAs were detected between 0.3-95.1 μg/g in nectar and 500-35000 μg/g in plant pollen. The PA composition in nectar and plant pollen was compared to the composition in honey. Echimidine (+N-oxide) was the main alkaloid detected in honey and nectar samples, while echivulgarine (+N-oxide) was the main PA found in plant pollen. These results suggest that nectar contributes more significantly to PA contamination in honey than plant pollen.

While the presence of secondary compounds in floral nectar has received considerable attention, much less is known about the ecological significance and evolutionary origin of secondary ‘toxic’ compounds in pollen. It is unclear whether the presence of these compounds in pollen is non‐adaptive and due to physiological ‘spillover’ from other floral tissues, or whether these compounds serve an adaptive function related to plant–pollinator interactions, such as protection of pollen against pollen thieves. Combining an experimental approach with phylogenetic comparative methods, and using western Palaearctic Boraginaceae as a model system, we investigate how pollen secondary metabolites influence, and are influenced by, relationships with bees, the main functional group of pollen‐foraging pollinators. We found a significant relationship between the levels of secondary compounds in the corollas and those in the pollen in the investigated species of Boraginaceae, suggesting that baseline levels of pollen secondary compounds may partly be due to spillover from floral tissues. At realistic levels, pollen secondary compounds showed significant detrimental effects on bee pre‐imaginal development, in agreement with previous egg‐transfer experiments showing that in some cases Boraginaceae pollen did not support pre‐imaginal development in bees not specialized on these plants. We also show that phylogenetically independent Boraginaceae taxa rewarding pollinators with pollen in addition to nectar exhibit significantly lower levels of toxic compounds in the pollen than taxa where the main reward is postulated to be nectar. Lastly, in contrast to our predictions, there was no positive association between toxin levels in the pollen of a given plant taxon and the number of bee species specialized on this taxon. We integrate all these findings and formulate an evolutionary scenario to account for the presence of toxic compounds in the pollen of Boraginaceae. We suggest that baseline levels of toxic compounds may be found in pollen due to spillover from other floral tissues and not primarily because of bee–flower interactions. Since pollen toxins can have detrimental effects on bees, we propose that selection acts to lower pollen toxin levels in plants where pollen, in addition to nectar, serves as a reward to bees. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.